From patchwork Thu Jan 14 18:23:22 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Segher Boessenkool X-Patchwork-Id: 567618 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D2F914076E for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 05:23:41 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gcc.gnu.org header.i=@gcc.gnu.org header.b=ydKP6H/c; dkim-atps=neutral DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id; q=dns; s=default; b=sW4yWjtdHc/5 9nnM9F5tg3VsnAXprKm+aXBuDmLcyIGMC7XHHYFwlbpT8btETqX8JXZemvoPR/WQ 85rrNkp5jouNXTqadCKaxEuFDC9SdgW36fgZov6gW4xkLR9lO/eDT3xY4M51qb1e zBn81d+LvPGLCsUKtNHB/fA+OvXkiGw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id; s=default; bh=Qzu6h1KJbMNVMe+cmV X6+6nhgN8=; b=ydKP6H/c1tB47VkFHBcPl/8gB07j0VtwpseFfY5K/kZ7Md0yED WS46gPC2DuKRz24rvCl052x2hKbXJ2LtJwPymPLqcvJEfFOKp/cbP6MITTvRHeMF aaAApm7XvgsKNRJNVCmp/s4dtBYXqJgQMUHwoqOTorZ5Iu71I/1ovs3xk= Received: (qmail 53750 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2016 18:23:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 53715 invoked by uid 89); 14 Jan 2016 18:23:33 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=by, mrl, imi, H*Ad:D*kernel.crashing.org X-HELO: gcc1-power7.osuosl.org Received: from gcc1-power7.osuosl.org (HELO gcc1-power7.osuosl.org) (140.211.15.137) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 18:23:31 +0000 Received: by gcc1-power7.osuosl.org (Postfix, from userid 10019) id 641E41C0406; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 18:23:28 +0000 (UTC) From: Segher Boessenkool To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: dje.gcc@gmail.com, Segher Boessenkool Subject: [PATCH] powerpc: Add some XFAILs to 20050603-3.c (PR68803) Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 18:23:22 +0000 Message-Id: X-IsSubscribed: yes In r230167 I made this testcase be tested on 64-bit as well, since it now works. That was a tad optimistic for powerpc64le though. For now, XFAIL it there. Is this okay for trunk? Tested the testcase manually on powerpc64-linux and powerpc64le-linux (that is, I ran "make check-gcc-c -k RUNTESTFLAGS=powerpc.exp=20050603-3.c"). Segher gcc/testsuite/ 2016-01-14 Segher Boessenkool PR target/68803 * gcc.target/powerpc/20050603-3.c: Add xfails for powerpc64le. --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/20050603-3.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/20050603-3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/20050603-3.c index 4017d34..1884241 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/20050603-3.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/20050603-3.c @@ -12,8 +12,9 @@ void rotins (unsigned int x) b.y = (x<<12) | (x>>20); } -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\mrlwinm} } } */ +/* The XFAILs are PR68803. */ +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\mrlwinm} { xfail powerpc64le-*-* } } } */ /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\mrldic} } } */ /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\mrot[lr]} } } */ /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\ms[lr][wd]} } } */ -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mrl[wd]imi} 1 } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mrl[wd]imi} 1 { xfail powerpc64le-*-* } } } */