OpenMP/Fortran: Fix loop-iter var privatization with !$OMP LOOP [PR108512]
For 'parallel', loop-iteration variables are marked are marked as 'private',
unless they either appear in an omp do/simd loop or an data-sharing clause
already exists for those on 'parallel'. 'omp loop' wasn't handled, leading
to (potentially) multiple data-sharing clauses in gfc_resolve_do_iterator
as omp_current_ctx pointed to the 'parallel' directive, ignoring the
in-betwen 'loop' directive.
The latter lead to a bogus diagnostic - or rather an ICE as the source
location var contained only '\0'.
Additionally, several 'case EXEC_OMP...LOOP' have been added to call the
right resolution function and likewise for '{masked,master} taskloop'.
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
PR fortran/108512
* openmp.cc (gfc_resolve_omp_parallel_blocks): Handle combined 'loop'
directives.
(gfc_resolve_do_iterator): Set a source location for added
'private'-clause arguments.
* resolve.cc (gfc_resolve_code): Call gfc_resolve_omp_do_blocks
also for EXEC_OMP_LOOP and gfc_resolve_omp_parallel_blocks for
combined directives with loop + '{masked,master} taskloop (simd)'.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR fortran/108512
* gfortran.dg/gomp/loop-5.f90: New test.
* gfortran.dg/gomp/loop-2.f90: Update dg-error.
* gfortran.dg/gomp/taskloop-2.f90: Update dg-error.
gcc/fortran/openmp.cc | 13 +++--
gcc/fortran/resolve.cc | 9 +++
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/gomp/loop-2.f90 | 5 ++
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/gomp/loop-5.f90 | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/gomp/taskloop-2.f90 | 2 +
5 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
@@ -9125,28 +9125,32 @@ gfc_resolve_omp_parallel_blocks (gfc_code *code, gfc_namespace *ns)
{
case EXEC_OMP_DISTRIBUTE_PARALLEL_DO:
case EXEC_OMP_DISTRIBUTE_PARALLEL_DO_SIMD:
+ case EXEC_OMP_MASKED_TASKLOOP:
+ case EXEC_OMP_MASKED_TASKLOOP_SIMD:
+ case EXEC_OMP_MASTER_TASKLOOP:
+ case EXEC_OMP_MASTER_TASKLOOP_SIMD:
case EXEC_OMP_PARALLEL_DO:
case EXEC_OMP_PARALLEL_DO_SIMD:
+ case EXEC_OMP_PARALLEL_LOOP:
case EXEC_OMP_PARALLEL_MASKED_TASKLOOP:
case EXEC_OMP_PARALLEL_MASKED_TASKLOOP_SIMD:
case EXEC_OMP_PARALLEL_MASTER_TASKLOOP:
case EXEC_OMP_PARALLEL_MASTER_TASKLOOP_SIMD:
- case EXEC_OMP_MASKED_TASKLOOP:
- case EXEC_OMP_MASKED_TASKLOOP_SIMD:
- case EXEC_OMP_MASTER_TASKLOOP:
- case EXEC_OMP_MASTER_TASKLOOP_SIMD:
case EXEC_OMP_TARGET_PARALLEL_DO:
case EXEC_OMP_TARGET_PARALLEL_DO_SIMD:
+ case EXEC_OMP_TARGET_PARALLEL_LOOP:
case EXEC_OMP_TARGET_TEAMS_DISTRIBUTE:
case EXEC_OMP_TARGET_TEAMS_DISTRIBUTE_PARALLEL_DO:
case EXEC_OMP_TARGET_TEAMS_DISTRIBUTE_PARALLEL_DO_SIMD:
case EXEC_OMP_TARGET_TEAMS_DISTRIBUTE_SIMD:
+ case EXEC_OMP_TARGET_TEAMS_LOOP:
case EXEC_OMP_TASKLOOP:
case EXEC_OMP_TASKLOOP_SIMD:
case EXEC_OMP_TEAMS_DISTRIBUTE:
case EXEC_OMP_TEAMS_DISTRIBUTE_PARALLEL_DO:
case EXEC_OMP_TEAMS_DISTRIBUTE_PARALLEL_DO_SIMD:
case EXEC_OMP_TEAMS_DISTRIBUTE_SIMD:
+ case EXEC_OMP_TEAMS_LOOP:
gfc_resolve_omp_do_blocks (code, ns);
break;
default:
@@ -9225,6 +9229,7 @@ gfc_resolve_do_iterator (gfc_code *code, gfc_symbol *sym, bool add_clause)
p = gfc_get_omp_namelist ();
p->sym = sym;
+ p->where = omp_current_ctx->code->loc;
p->next = omp_clauses->lists[OMP_LIST_PRIVATE];
omp_clauses->lists[OMP_LIST_PRIVATE] = p;
}
@@ -11923,9 +11923,14 @@ gfc_resolve_code (gfc_code *code, gfc_namespace *ns)
break;
case EXEC_OMP_DISTRIBUTE_PARALLEL_DO:
case EXEC_OMP_DISTRIBUTE_PARALLEL_DO_SIMD:
+ case EXEC_OMP_MASKED_TASKLOOP:
+ case EXEC_OMP_MASKED_TASKLOOP_SIMD:
+ case EXEC_OMP_MASTER_TASKLOOP:
+ case EXEC_OMP_MASTER_TASKLOOP_SIMD:
case EXEC_OMP_PARALLEL:
case EXEC_OMP_PARALLEL_DO:
case EXEC_OMP_PARALLEL_DO_SIMD:
+ case EXEC_OMP_PARALLEL_LOOP:
case EXEC_OMP_PARALLEL_MASKED:
case EXEC_OMP_PARALLEL_MASKED_TASKLOOP:
case EXEC_OMP_PARALLEL_MASKED_TASKLOOP_SIMD:
@@ -11936,11 +11941,13 @@ gfc_resolve_code (gfc_code *code, gfc_namespace *ns)
case EXEC_OMP_TARGET_PARALLEL:
case EXEC_OMP_TARGET_PARALLEL_DO:
case EXEC_OMP_TARGET_PARALLEL_DO_SIMD:
+ case EXEC_OMP_TARGET_PARALLEL_LOOP:
case EXEC_OMP_TARGET_TEAMS:
case EXEC_OMP_TARGET_TEAMS_DISTRIBUTE:
case EXEC_OMP_TARGET_TEAMS_DISTRIBUTE_PARALLEL_DO:
case EXEC_OMP_TARGET_TEAMS_DISTRIBUTE_PARALLEL_DO_SIMD:
case EXEC_OMP_TARGET_TEAMS_DISTRIBUTE_SIMD:
+ case EXEC_OMP_TARGET_TEAMS_LOOP:
case EXEC_OMP_TASK:
case EXEC_OMP_TASKLOOP:
case EXEC_OMP_TASKLOOP_SIMD:
@@ -11949,6 +11956,7 @@ gfc_resolve_code (gfc_code *code, gfc_namespace *ns)
case EXEC_OMP_TEAMS_DISTRIBUTE_PARALLEL_DO:
case EXEC_OMP_TEAMS_DISTRIBUTE_PARALLEL_DO_SIMD:
case EXEC_OMP_TEAMS_DISTRIBUTE_SIMD:
+ case EXEC_OMP_TEAMS_LOOP:
omp_workshare_save = omp_workshare_flag;
omp_workshare_flag = 0;
gfc_resolve_omp_parallel_blocks (code, ns);
@@ -11957,6 +11965,7 @@ gfc_resolve_code (gfc_code *code, gfc_namespace *ns)
case EXEC_OMP_DISTRIBUTE_SIMD:
case EXEC_OMP_DO:
case EXEC_OMP_DO_SIMD:
+ case EXEC_OMP_LOOP:
case EXEC_OMP_SIMD:
case EXEC_OMP_TARGET_SIMD:
gfc_resolve_omp_do_blocks (code, ns);
@@ -18,18 +18,23 @@ do i = 1, 64
end do
!$omp loop reduction(inscan, +: r) ! { dg-error "'inscan' REDUCTION clause on construct other than DO, SIMD, DO SIMD, PARALLEL DO, PARALLEL DO SIMD" }
+ ! { dg-error "With INSCAN at .1., expected loop body with ..OMP SCAN between two structured-block-sequences" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
do i = 1, 64
end do
!$omp teams loop reduction(inscan, +: r) ! { dg-error "'inscan' REDUCTION clause on construct other than DO, SIMD, DO SIMD, PARALLEL DO, PARALLEL DO SIMD" }
+ ! { dg-error "With INSCAN at .1., expected loop body with ..OMP SCAN between two structured-block-sequences" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
do i = 1, 64
end do
!$omp parallel loop reduction(inscan, +: r) ! { dg-error "'inscan' REDUCTION clause on construct other than DO, SIMD, DO SIMD, PARALLEL DO, PARALLEL DO SIMD" }
+ ! { dg-error "With INSCAN at .1., expected loop body with ..OMP SCAN between two structured-block-sequences" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
do i = 1, 64
end do
!$omp target teams loop reduction(inscan, +: r) ! { dg-error "'inscan' REDUCTION clause on construct other than DO, SIMD, DO SIMD, PARALLEL DO, PARALLEL DO SIMD" }
+ ! { dg-error "With INSCAN at .1., expected loop body with ..OMP SCAN between two structured-block-sequences" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
do i = 1, 64
end do
!$omp target parallel loop reduction(inscan, +: r) ! { dg-error "'inscan' REDUCTION clause on construct other than DO, SIMD, DO SIMD, PARALLEL DO, PARALLEL DO SIMD" }
+ ! { dg-error "With INSCAN at .1., expected loop body with ..OMP SCAN between two structured-block-sequences" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
do i = 1, 64
end do
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+! { dg-additional-options "-fdump-tree-original" }
+!
+! PR fortran/108512
+
+! The problem was that the context wasn't reset for the 'LOOP'
+! such that the clauses of the loops weren't seen when adding
+! PRIVATE clauses.
+!
+! In the following, only the loop variable of the non-OpenMP loop
+! in 'subroutine four' should get a front-end addded PRIVATE clause
+
+implicit none
+integer :: x, a(10), b(10), n
+ n = 10
+ a = -42
+ b = [(2*x, x=1,10)]
+
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "#pragma omp target map\\(tofrom:a\\) map\\(tofrom:b\\) map\\(tofrom:x\\)\[\r\n\]" 1 "original" } }
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "#pragma omp parallel\[\r\n\]" 2 "original" } }
+! ^- shows up twice; checked only here.
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "#pragma omp loop lastprivate\\(x\\)\[\r\n\]" 1 "original" } }
+
+ !$omp target parallel map(tofrom: a, b, x)
+ !$omp loop lastprivate(x)
+ DO x = 1, n
+ a(x) = a(x) + b(x)
+ END DO
+ !$omp end loop
+ !$omp end target parallel
+ if (x /= 11) error stop
+ if (any (a /= [(2*x - 42, x=1,10)])) error stop
+ call two()
+ call three()
+ call four()
+end
+
+subroutine two
+ implicit none
+ integer :: ii, mm, arr(10)
+ mm = 10
+ arr = 0
+
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "#pragma omp target map\\(tofrom:arr\\) map\\(tofrom:ii\\)\[\r\n\]" 1 "original" } }
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "#pragma omp parallel shared\\(ii\\)\[\r\n\]" 1 "original" } }
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "#pragma omp loop lastprivate\\(ii\\)\[\r\n\]" 1 "original" } }
+
+ !$omp target parallel loop map(tofrom: arr) lastprivate(ii)
+ DO ii = 1, mm
+ arr(ii) = arr(ii) + ii
+ END DO
+end
+
+subroutine three
+ implicit none
+ integer :: kk, zz, var(10)
+ zz = 10
+ var = 0
+
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "#pragma omp target map\\(tofrom:var\\)\[\r\n\]" 1 "original" } }
+! "#pragma omp parallel\[\r\n\]" - shows up twice, dump checked above
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "#pragma omp loop\[\r\n\]" 1 "original" } }
+
+ !$omp target parallel loop map(tofrom: var)
+ DO kk = 1, zz
+ var(kk) = var(kk) + kk
+ END DO
+end
+
+subroutine four
+ implicit none
+ integer :: jj, qq, dist(10)
+ qq = 10
+ dist = 0
+
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "#pragma omp target map\\(tofrom:dist\\)\[\r\n\]" 1 "original" } }
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "#pragma omp parallel private\\(jj\\)\[\r\n\]" 1 "original" } }
+
+ !$omp target parallel map(tofrom: dist)
+ ! *no* '!$omp do/loop/simd'
+ DO jj = 1, qq
+ dist(qq) = dist(qq) + qq
+ END DO
+ !$omp end target parallel
+end
@@ -27,9 +27,11 @@ end do
do i = 1, 64 ! { dg-error "OMP SCAN between two structured-block-sequences" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
end do
!$omp master taskloop reduction(inscan, +: r) ! { dg-error "'inscan' REDUCTION clause on construct other than DO, SIMD, DO SIMD, PARALLEL DO, PARALLEL DO SIMD" }
+ ! { dg-error "With INSCAN at .1., expected loop body with ..OMP SCAN between two structured-block-sequences" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
do i = 1, 64
end do
!$omp master taskloop simd reduction(inscan, +: r) ! { dg-error "'inscan' REDUCTION clause on construct other than DO, SIMD, DO SIMD, PARALLEL DO, PARALLEL DO SIMD" }
+ ! { dg-error "With INSCAN at .1., expected loop body with ..OMP SCAN between two structured-block-sequences" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
do i = 1, 64
end do
!$omp parallel master taskloop reduction(inscan, +: r) ! { dg-error "'inscan' REDUCTION clause on construct other than DO, SIMD, DO SIMD, PARALLEL DO, PARALLEL DO SIMD" }