Message ID | CAGWvnynH7OZ1+jqredtKJ-JY1dqaAf1T2WPyD5UwZw6pAYSEhg@mail.gmail.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On 01/27/2016 05:14 PM, David Edelsohn wrote: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> wrote: >> On 01/27/2016 12:39 PM, David Edelsohn wrote: >>> >>> The new sra-17.c and sra-18.c tests fail on AIX because the regex is >>> too restrictive -- AIX labels don't have exactly the same format. On >>> AIX, the labels in the dumps look like "LC..0" instead of ".LC0". >>> >>> This patch adds "*" and ".*" so that the "." prepended to LC is >>> optional and to allow characters between the "LC" and the "0". >>> >>> I needed extra escapes for the sra-17.c line that matches multiple >>> times - for no apparent reason. >> >> The joys of expect/tcl. I just keep escaping until the regex that I >> developed outside the suite works. I have been trying to get away from >> using .* though. The longest match nature sometimes gives surprising >> results. In theory .*? ought to work better, but I haven't tried using it >> much. >> >> Anyway, the change looks fine to me. > > Segher pointed out to me that my revised regex was matching multiple > lines, so it was not triggering multiple times without the restriction > on the pattern. > > A revised, tighter patch uses "?" Yup, that's precisely why I've moved away from .* :-) jeff
Index: sra-17.c =================================================================== --- sra-17.c (revision 232904) +++ sra-17.c (working copy) @@ -15,5 +15,5 @@ abort (); } -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Removing load: a = \\\*.LC0;" 1 "esra" } } */ -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "SR.\[0-9_\]+ = \\\*.LC0\\\[" 4 "esra" } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Removing load: a = \\\*\\.?LC\\.?\\.?0;" 1 "esra" } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "SR\\.\[0-9_\]+ = \\\*\\.?LC\\.?\\.?0\\\[" 4 "esra" } } */ Index: sra-18.c =================================================================== --- sra-18.c (revision 232904) +++ sra-18.c (working copy) @@ -21,8 +21,8 @@ abort (); } -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Removing load: a = \\\*.LC0;" 1 "esra" } } */ -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "SR.\[0-9_\]+ = \\\*.LC0\\.b\\\[0\\\]\\.f\\\[0\\\]\\.x" 1 "esra" } } */ -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "SR.\[0-9_\]+ = \\\*.LC0\\.b\\\[0\\\]\\.f\\\[1\\\]\\.x" 1 "esra" } } */ -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "SR.\[0-9_\]+ = \\\*.LC0\\.b\\\[1\\\]\\.f\\\[0\\\]\\.x" 1 "esra" } } */ -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "SR.\[0-9_\]+ = \\\*.LC0\\.b\\\[1\\\]\\.f\\\[1\\\]\\.x" 1 "esra" } } */