diff mbox

[wwwdocs] gcc-4.9 changes: mention support of the Intel Silvermont microarchitecture

Message ID CADj25HMK3Ce8xVEuqLKq+PEA2MHw9_ebyw=FvVDsoXbhbeGFtA@mail.gmail.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Chung-Ju Wu July 2, 2013, 7:31 a.m. UTC 
2013/6/25 Kirill Yukhin <kirill.yukhin@gmail.com>:
> Hello,
>>
>> Looks good to me; just say "the new Intel...".
> Checked int www CVS.
>
> Thanks, K

Hi, Kirill,

By reviewing webpage of gcc-4.9 changes:
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.9/changes.html

I noticed there is a duplicate subsection 'IA-32/x86-64'
under "New Targets and Target Specific Improvements".

According to the cvs log of changes.html, it is caused
by revision 1.19 that created another 'IA-32/x86-64' subsection.




I think that would be better to merge the content into
single 'IA-32/x86-64' subsection.
But I have no idea about the order of those two items.
Perhaps you or Sriraman can make the decision for the change? :-)


Best regards,
jasonwucj

Comments

Kirill Yukhin July 2, 2013, 7:50 a.m. UTC | #1 
On 7/2/2013 11:31 AM, Chung-Ju Wu wrote:
> I think that would be better to merge the content into single
> 'IA-32/x86-64' subsection. But I have no idea about the order of those
> two items. Perhaps you or Sriraman can make the decision for the
> change? :-)
Hi, thanks for pointing!
I think order of bullets doesn't matter too much. Fixed as obvious.

Thanks, K
diff mbox

Patch

===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html,v
retrieving revision 1.18
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -r1.18 -r1.19
--- wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html	2013/06/24 22:06:53	1.18
+++ wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html	2013/06/25 08:05:13	1.19
@@ -175,6 +175,13 @@ 

 <h2 id="targets">New Targets and Target Specific Improvements</h2>

+<h3>IA-32/x86-64</h3>
+  <ul>
+    <li> GCC now supports the new Intel microarchitecture named Silvermont
+      through <code>-march=slm</code>.
+    </li>
+  </ul>
+
 <h3 id="x86">IA-32/x86-64</h3>
   <ul>
     <li> It is now possible to call x86 intrinsics from select functions in