diff mbox series

[testsuite] Run more gcc.dg/store_merging_*.c tests

Message ID 9151549.XcvHfQ3ZfO@polaris
State New
Headers show
Series [testsuite] Run more gcc.dg/store_merging_*.c tests | expand

Commit Message

Eric Botcazou May 31, 2018, 11:22 a.m. UTC 
There is a handful of gcc.dg/store_merging_*.c tests in the testsuite with 
both a main procedure doing sanity checks and a dg-do compile directive.

Tested on x86-64/Linux, applied on the mainline and 8 branch as obvious.


2018-05-31  Eric Botcazou  <ebotcazou@adacore.com>

	* gcc.dg/store_merging_10.c: Turn dg-do compile into dg-do run.
	* gcc.dg/store_merging_11.c: Likewise.
	* gcc.dg/store_merging_13.c: Likewise.
	* gcc.dg/store_merging_14.c: Likewise.
	* gcc.dg/store_merging_15.c: Likewise.
	* gcc.dg/store_merging_16.c: Likewise.  Remove local variable.

Comments

Jakub Jelinek May 31, 2018, 11:26 a.m. UTC | #1 
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 01:22:00PM +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> There is a handful of gcc.dg/store_merging_*.c tests in the testsuite with 
> both a main procedure doing sanity checks and a dg-do compile directive.
> 
> Tested on x86-64/Linux, applied on the mainline and 8 branch as obvious.

Oops, thanks for fixing that.

> 2018-05-31  Eric Botcazou  <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
> 
> 	* gcc.dg/store_merging_10.c: Turn dg-do compile into dg-do run.
> 	* gcc.dg/store_merging_11.c: Likewise.
> 	* gcc.dg/store_merging_13.c: Likewise.
> 	* gcc.dg/store_merging_14.c: Likewise.
> 	* gcc.dg/store_merging_15.c: Likewise.
> 	* gcc.dg/store_merging_16.c: Likewise.  Remove local variable.

	Jakub
diff mbox series

Patch

Index: gcc.dg/store_merging_10.c
===================================================================
--- gcc.dg/store_merging_10.c	(revision 260913)
+++ gcc.dg/store_merging_10.c	(working copy)
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ 
-/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-do run } */
 /* { dg-require-effective-target store_merge } */
 /* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-store-merging" } */
 
Index: gcc.dg/store_merging_11.c
===================================================================
--- gcc.dg/store_merging_11.c	(revision 260913)
+++ gcc.dg/store_merging_11.c	(working copy)
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ 
-/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-do run } */
 /* { dg-require-effective-target store_merge } */
 /* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-store-merging" } */
 
Index: gcc.dg/store_merging_13.c
===================================================================
--- gcc.dg/store_merging_13.c	(revision 260913)
+++ gcc.dg/store_merging_13.c	(working copy)
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ 
-/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-do run } */
 /* { dg-require-effective-target store_merge } */
 /* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-store-merging" } */
 
Index: gcc.dg/store_merging_14.c
===================================================================
--- gcc.dg/store_merging_14.c	(revision 260913)
+++ gcc.dg/store_merging_14.c	(working copy)
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ 
-/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-do run } */
 /* { dg-require-effective-target store_merge } */
 /* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-store-merging" } */
 
Index: gcc.dg/store_merging_15.c
===================================================================
--- gcc.dg/store_merging_15.c	(revision 260913)
+++ gcc.dg/store_merging_15.c	(working copy)
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ 
-/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-do run } */
 /* { dg-require-effective-target store_merge } */
 /* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-store-merging" } */
 
Index: gcc.dg/store_merging_16.c
===================================================================
--- gcc.dg/store_merging_16.c	(revision 260913)
+++ gcc.dg/store_merging_16.c	(working copy)
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ 
 /* Only test on some 64-bit targets which do have bswap{si,di}2 patterns and
    are either big or little endian (not pdp endian).  */
-/* { dg-do compile { target { lp64 && { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* powerpc*-*-* aarch64*-*-* } } } } */
+/* { dg-do run { target { lp64 && { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* powerpc*-*-* aarch64*-*-* } } } } */
 /* { dg-require-effective-target store_merge } */
 /* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-store-merging" } */
 
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@  main ()
 {
   unsigned char a[8];
   int i;
-  struct S b, c, d;
+  struct S c, d;
   f1 (a, 0x0102030405060708ULL);
   for (i = 0; i < 8; ++i)
     if (a[i] != 8 - i)