@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+2017-01-04 Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
+
+ PR tree-optimizatin/78812
+ * rtl.h (contains_mem_rtx_p): Prototype.
+ * ifcvt.c (containts_mem_rtx_p): Move from here to...
+ * rtlanal.c (contains_mem_rtx_p): Here and remvoe static linkage.
+ * gcse.c (prune_expressions): Use contains_mem_rtx_p to discover
+ and prune MEMs that are not at the toplevel of a SET_SRC rtx. Look
+ through ZERO_EXTEND and SIGN_EXTEND when trying to avoid pruning
+ MEMs.
+
2017-01-04 Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
* input.c (assert_char_at_range): Default-initialize
@@ -1709,7 +1709,7 @@ prune_expressions (bool pre_p)
continue;
}
- if (!pre_p && MEM_P (expr->expr))
+ if (!pre_p && contains_mem_rtx_p (expr->expr))
/* Note memory references that can be clobbered by a call.
We do not split abnormal edges in hoisting, so would
a memory reference get hoisted along an abnormal edge,
@@ -1717,15 +1717,28 @@ prune_expressions (bool pre_p)
constant memory references can be hoisted along abnormal
edges. */
{
- if (GET_CODE (XEXP (expr->expr, 0)) == SYMBOL_REF
- && CONSTANT_POOL_ADDRESS_P (XEXP (expr->expr, 0)))
- continue;
-
- if (MEM_READONLY_P (expr->expr)
- && !MEM_VOLATILE_P (expr->expr)
- && MEM_NOTRAP_P (expr->expr))
- /* Constant memory reference, e.g., a PIC address. */
- continue;
+ rtx x = expr->expr;
+
+ /* Common cases where we might find the MEM which may allow us
+ to avoid pruning the expression. */
+ while (GET_CODE (x) == ZERO_EXTEND || GET_CODE (x) == SIGN_EXTEND)
+ x = XEXP (x, 0);
+
+ /* If we found the MEM, go ahead and look at it to see if it has
+ properties that allow us to avoid pruning its expression out
+ of the tables. */
+ if (MEM_P (x))
+ {
+ if (GET_CODE (XEXP (x, 0)) == SYMBOL_REF
+ && CONSTANT_POOL_ADDRESS_P (XEXP (x, 0)))
+ continue;
+
+ if (MEM_READONLY_P (x)
+ && !MEM_VOLATILE_P (x)
+ && MEM_NOTRAP_P (x))
+ /* Constant memory reference, e.g., a PIC address. */
+ continue;
+ }
/* ??? Optimally, we would use interprocedural alias
analysis to determine if this mem is actually killed
@@ -3010,19 +3010,6 @@ noce_operand_ok (const_rtx op)
return ! may_trap_p (op);
}
-/* Return true if X contains a MEM subrtx. */
-
-static bool
-contains_mem_rtx_p (rtx x)
-{
- subrtx_iterator::array_type array;
- FOR_EACH_SUBRTX (iter, array, x, ALL)
- if (MEM_P (*iter))
- return true;
-
- return false;
-}
-
/* Return true iff basic block TEST_BB is valid for noce if-conversion.
The condition used in this if-conversion is in COND.
In practice, check that TEST_BB ends with a single set
@@ -3090,6 +3090,7 @@ extern bool rtx_referenced_p (const_rtx, const_rtx);
extern bool tablejump_p (const rtx_insn *, rtx_insn **, rtx_jump_table_data **);
extern int computed_jump_p (const rtx_insn *);
extern bool tls_referenced_p (const_rtx);
+extern bool contains_mem_rtx_p (rtx x);
/* Overload for refers_to_regno_p for checking a single register. */
inline bool
@@ -685,6 +685,19 @@ rtx_addr_can_trap_p (const_rtx x)
return rtx_addr_can_trap_p_1 (x, 0, 0, VOIDmode, false);
}
+/* Return true if X contains a MEM subrtx. */
+
+bool
+contains_mem_rtx_p (rtx x)
+{
+ subrtx_iterator::array_type array;
+ FOR_EACH_SUBRTX (iter, array, x, ALL)
+ if (MEM_P (*iter))
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
+
/* Return true if X is an address that is known to not be zero. */
bool
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2017-01-04 Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
+
+ PR tree-optimization/78812
+ * g++.dg/torture/pr78812.C: New test.
+
2017-01-04 Michael Meissner <meissner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
PR target/71977
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+// { dg-do run }
+// { dg-options "-fpic" { target fpic } }
+
+struct T
+{
+ bool a;
+ T () : a (false) {}
+ ~T () { if (!a) __builtin_abort (); }
+};
+
+__attribute__((noinline))
+void
+test (T &x)
+{
+ x.a = true;
+}
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+ T T;
+ test (T);
+}
+
GCSE has some smarts to detect cases when a MEM appears in a block with predecessor edges marked as EDGE_ABNORMAL. Such MEMs are removed from the antic/transparent bitmaps. Unfortunately this code did not work if the MEM was not the topmost RTX. So something like (zero_extend (mem (...)) would not result in the MEM being removed. This in turn caused code hoisting to hoist the MEM into a predecessor block. The predecessor block ended with a function call so gcse was forced to insert the new insn before the call. But the value is changed by the call. This patch moves contains_mem_rtx_p into rtlanal.c and uses it to detect when there's MEMs that aren't the toplevel RTX expression. The patch also knows how to look through certain toplevel expressions (ZERO_EXTEND, SIGN_EXTEND) to find the buried MEM expression. This allows the code to prune more selectively if the MEM is a constant pool address or otherwise readonly. Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. ALso verified RTL hoisting no longer hoists the (zero_extend (mem)) expression with an s390x cross compiler. Installing on the trunk. It should be safe to backport to the release branches if anyone sees a need. Jeff commit 0998df91b6ad2035f5fd41ee024e3ab919a9cefe Author: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> Date: Thu Jan 5 00:37:57 2017 -0700 PR tree-optimizatin/78812 * rtl.h (contains_mem_rtx_p): Prototype. * ifcvt.c (containts_mem_rtx_p): Move from here to... * rtlanal.c (contains_mem_rtx_p): Here and remvoe static linkage. * gcse.c (prune_expressions): Use contains_mem_rtx_p to discover and prune MEMs that are not at the toplevel of a SET_SRC rtx. Look through ZERO_EXTEND and SIGN_EXTEND when trying to avoid pruning MEMs. PR tree-optimization/78812 * g++.dg/torture/pr78812.C: New test.