Message ID | 52E9747F-9B20-4CA9-9960-60888629055D@adacore.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote: > > On Jul 4, 2012, at 10:58 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: > > > On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote: > > > >> > >> On Jul 2, 2012, at 1:43 PM, Richard Guenther wrote: > >> > >>> On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, Diego Novillo wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 12-06-27 11:06 , Richard Guenther wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> 2012-06-27 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de> > >>>>> Michael Matz <matz@suse.de> > >>>>> Tobias Grosser <tobias@grosser.es> > >>>>> Sebastian Pop <sebpop@gmail.com> > >>>>> > >>>>> config/ > >>>>> * cloog.m4: Set up to work against ISL only. > >>>>> * isl.m4: New file. > >> > >> Shouldn't ENABLE_IS_CHECK be automatically set to no when building a cross canadian ? > > > > Probably yes, as it is a runtime test. Thus at any time when host != > > build. Care to post a patch? You probably know best what the canonical > > way to check this is. > > Something like that ? > > Tested by building a cross and a canadian for ia64-hp-openvms. Seems to be an incremental patch ontop of the real patch? Richard.
On Jul 4, 2012, at 12:32 PM, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote: > >> >> On Jul 4, 2012, at 10:58 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On Jul 2, 2012, at 1:43 PM, Richard Guenther wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, Diego Novillo wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 12-06-27 11:06 , Richard Guenther wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> 2012-06-27 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de> >>>>>>> Michael Matz <matz@suse.de> >>>>>>> Tobias Grosser <tobias@grosser.es> >>>>>>> Sebastian Pop <sebpop@gmail.com> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> config/ >>>>>>> * cloog.m4: Set up to work against ISL only. >>>>>>> * isl.m4: New file. >>>> >>>> Shouldn't ENABLE_IS_CHECK be automatically set to no when building a cross canadian ? >>> >>> Probably yes, as it is a runtime test. Thus at any time when host != >>> build. Care to post a patch? You probably know best what the canonical >>> way to check this is. >> >> Something like that ? >> >> Tested by building a cross and a canadian for ia64-hp-openvms. > > Seems to be an incremental patch ontop of the real patch? No, what does make you think so ? That's an incremental patch on top of many VMS specific unrelated patches, but this is the real patch: building a cross compiler fails without it. Tristan.
diff --git a/config/isl.m4 b/config/isl.m4 index 152d422..831ac26 100644 --- a/config/isl.m4 +++ b/config/isl.m4 @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ AC_DEFUN([ISL_REQUESTED], # _ISL_CHECK_CT_PROG(MAJOR, MINOR) # -------------------------------------------- -# Helper for verifying CLooG's compile time version. +# Helper for verifying ISL compile time version. m4_define([_ISL_CHECK_CT_PROG],[AC_LANG_PROGRAM( [#include <isl/version.h> [gcc_cv_isl=yes],