diff mbox series

tree-optimization/103458 - avoid creating new loops in CD-DCE

Message ID 3sqo26s1-1510-6pnn-n948-spop8495r6s@fhfr.qr
State New
Headers show
Series tree-optimization/103458 - avoid creating new loops in CD-DCE | expand

Commit Message

Richard Biener Nov. 29, 2021, 9:11 a.m. UTC 
When creating forwarders in CD-DCE we have to avoid creating loops
where we formerly did not consider those because of abnormal
predecessors.  At this point simply excuse us when there are any
abnormal predecessors.

Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, pushed.

2021-11-29  Richard Biener  <rguenther@suse.de>

	PR tree-optimization/103458
	* tree-ssa-dce.c (make_forwarders_with_degenerate_phis): Do not
	create forwarders for blocks with abnormal predecessors.

	* gcc.dg/torture/pr103458.c: New testcase.
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr103458.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 gcc/tree-ssa-dce.c                      |  8 ++++++--
 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr103458.c
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr103458.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr103458.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..3fd3b5fd2ff
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr103458.c
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ 
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-Wno-div-by-zero" } */
+
+__attribute__ ((returns_twice)) int
+bar (void);
+
+void
+foo (int *p, int x)
+{
+  *p = 0;
+  while (*p < 1)
+    {
+      x = 0;
+      while (x < 1)
+        bar ();
+
+      x /= 0;
+    }
+
+  foo (p, x);
+}
diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-dce.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-dce.c
index e3e6f0955b7..1f817b95fab 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-ssa-dce.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-dce.c
@@ -1650,8 +1650,12 @@  make_forwarders_with_degenerate_phis (function *fn)
       /* Only PHIs with three or more arguments have opportunities.  */
       if (EDGE_COUNT (bb->preds) < 3)
 	continue;
-      /* Do not touch loop headers.  */
-      if (bb->loop_father->header == bb)
+      /* Do not touch loop headers or blocks with abnormal predecessors.
+	 ???  This is to avoid creating valid loops here, see PR103458.
+	 We might want to improve things to either explicitely add those
+	 loops or at least consider blocks with no backedges.  */
+      if (bb->loop_father->header == bb
+	  || bb_has_abnormal_pred (bb))
 	continue;
 
       /* Take one PHI node as template to look for identical