commit a33e3dcbd15e73603796e30b5eeec11a0c8bacec
Author: Vladimir N. Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>
Date: Mon Feb 13 16:05:04 2023 -0500
RA: Clear reg equiv caller_save_p flag when clearing defined_p flag
IRA can invalidate initially setup equivalence in setup_reg_equiv.
Flag caller_saved was not cleared during invalidation although
init_insns were cleared. It resulted in segmentation fault in
get_equiv. Clearing the flag solves the problem. For more
precaution I added clearing the flag in other places too although it
might be not necessary.
PR rtl-optimization/108774
gcc/ChangeLog:
* ira.cc (ira_update_equiv_info_by_shuffle_insn): Clear equiv
caller_save_p flag when clearing defined_p flag.
(setup_reg_equiv): Ditto.
* lra-constraints.cc (lra_constraints): Ditto.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/i386/pr108774.c: New.
@@ -2725,6 +2725,7 @@ ira_update_equiv_info_by_shuffle_insn (int to_regno, int from_regno, rtx_insn *i
return;
}
ira_reg_equiv[to_regno].defined_p = false;
+ ira_reg_equiv[to_regno].caller_save_p = false;
ira_reg_equiv[to_regno].memory
= ira_reg_equiv[to_regno].constant
= ira_reg_equiv[to_regno].invariant
@@ -4193,6 +4194,7 @@ setup_reg_equiv (void)
if (ira_reg_equiv[i].memory == NULL_RTX)
{
ira_reg_equiv[i].defined_p = false;
+ ira_reg_equiv[i].caller_save_p = false;
ira_reg_equiv[i].init_insns = NULL;
break;
}
@@ -4203,6 +4205,7 @@ setup_reg_equiv (void)
}
}
ira_reg_equiv[i].defined_p = false;
+ ira_reg_equiv[i].caller_save_p = false;
ira_reg_equiv[i].init_insns = NULL;
break;
}
@@ -5100,7 +5100,8 @@ lra_constraints (bool first_p)
&& (targetm.preferred_reload_class
(x, lra_get_allocno_class (i)) == NO_REGS))
|| contains_symbol_ref_p (x))))
- ira_reg_equiv[i].defined_p = false;
+ ira_reg_equiv[i].defined_p
+ = ira_reg_equiv[i].caller_save_p = false;
if (contains_reg_p (x, false, true))
ira_reg_equiv[i].profitable_p = false;
if (get_equiv (reg) != reg)
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+/* PR target/108774 */
+/* { dg-do compile { target x86_64-*-* } } */
+/* { dg-options "-Os -ftrapv -mcmodel=large" } */
+
+int i, j;
+
+void
+foo (void)
+{
+ i = ((1 << j) - 1) >> j;
+}