diff mbox

[Fortran,OpenACC] Fix PR70598, Fortran host_data ICE

Message ID 25374818-5cac-ef7a-04a6-fb46f8cd1076@codesourcery.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Chung-Lin Tang July 29, 2016, 3:47 p.m. UTC
On 2016/7/21 07:13 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Better put every && on a separate line if the whole if (...) doesn't fit
> on a single line.
> 
>> > +			  && !n->sym->attr.cray_pointer
>> > +			  && !n->sym->attr.cray_pointee)
> This is too ugly.  I'd instead move the if after the cray pointer/pointee
> tests, i.e.
> if (n->sym->attr.cray_pointer)
>   gfc_error (...);
> else if (n->sym->attr.cray_pointee)
>   gfc_error (...);
> else if (n->sym->attr.flavor == FL_VARIABLE
> 	 && !n->sym->as
> 	 && !n->sym->attr.pointer)
>   gfc_error (...);
> 

Hi Jakub, I've adjusted the patch like you suggested.

Patch has been re-tested and applied to gomp-4_0-branch,
okay for trunk as well?

Index: testsuite/libgomp.oacc-fortran/host_data-1.f90
===================================================================
--- testsuite/libgomp.oacc-fortran/host_data-1.f90	(revision 0)
+++ testsuite/libgomp.oacc-fortran/host_data-1.f90	(revision 0)
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+! { dg-do run }
+! { dg-additional-options "-cpp" }
+
+program test
+  implicit none
+
+  integer, target :: i, arr(1000)
+  integer, pointer :: ip, iph
+  integer, contiguous, pointer :: parr(:), parrh(:)
+
+  ! Assign the same targets
+  ip => i
+  parr => arr
+  iph => i
+  parrh => arr
+
+  !$acc data copyin(i, arr)
+  !$acc host_data use_device(ip, parr)
+
+  ! Test how the pointers compare inside a host_data construct
+#if ACC_MEM_SHARED
+  if (.not. associated(ip, iph)) call abort
+  if (.not. associated(parr, parrh)) call abort
+#else
+  if (associated(ip, iph)) call abort
+  if (associated(parr, parrh)) call abort
+#endif
+
+  !$acc end host_data
+  !$acc end data
+
+end program test

Comments

Jakub Jelinek Aug. 9, 2016, 3:30 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 11:47:18PM +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> On 2016/7/21 07:13 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Better put every && on a separate line if the whole if (...) doesn't fit
> > on a single line.
> > 
> >> > +			  && !n->sym->attr.cray_pointer
> >> > +			  && !n->sym->attr.cray_pointee)
> > This is too ugly.  I'd instead move the if after the cray pointer/pointee
> > tests, i.e.
> > if (n->sym->attr.cray_pointer)
> >   gfc_error (...);
> > else if (n->sym->attr.cray_pointee)
> >   gfc_error (...);
> > else if (n->sym->attr.flavor == FL_VARIABLE
> > 	 && !n->sym->as
> > 	 && !n->sym->attr.pointer)
> >   gfc_error (...);
> > 
> 
> Hi Jakub, I've adjusted the patch like you suggested.
> 
> Patch has been re-tested and applied to gomp-4_0-branch,
> okay for trunk as well?

Ok with suitable ChangeLog entry.

	Jakub
diff mbox

Patch

Index: fortran/openmp.c
===================================================================
--- fortran/openmp.c	(revision 238751)
+++ fortran/openmp.c	(working copy)
@@ -3752,17 +3752,24 @@  resolve_omp_clauses (gfc_code *code, gfc_omp_claus
 			      && CLASS_DATA (n->sym)->attr.allocatable))
 			gfc_error ("ALLOCATABLE object %qs in %s clause at %L",
 				   n->sym->name, name, &n->where);
-		      if (n->sym->attr.pointer
-			  || (n->sym->ts.type == BT_CLASS && CLASS_DATA (n->sym)
-			      && CLASS_DATA (n->sym)->attr.class_pointer))
-			gfc_error ("POINTER object %qs in %s clause at %L",
-				   n->sym->name, name, &n->where);
+		      if (n->sym->ts.type == BT_CLASS
+			  && CLASS_DATA (n->sym)
+			  && CLASS_DATA (n->sym)->attr.class_pointer)
+			gfc_error ("POINTER object %qs of polymorphic type in "
+				   "%s clause at %L", n->sym->name, name,
+				   &n->where);
 		      if (n->sym->attr.cray_pointer)
 			gfc_error ("Cray pointer object %qs in %s clause at %L",
 				   n->sym->name, name, &n->where);
-		      if (n->sym->attr.cray_pointee)
+		      else if (n->sym->attr.cray_pointee)
 			gfc_error ("Cray pointee object %qs in %s clause at %L",
 				   n->sym->name, name, &n->where);
+		      else if (n->sym->attr.flavor == FL_VARIABLE
+			       && !n->sym->as
+			       && !n->sym->attr.pointer)
+			gfc_error ("%s clause variable %qs at %L is neither "
+				   "a POINTER nor an array", name,
+				   n->sym->name, &n->where);
 		      /* FALLTHRU */
 		  case OMP_LIST_DEVICE_RESIDENT:
 		    check_symbol_not_pointer (n->sym, n->where, name);
Index: testsuite/gfortran.dg/goacc/uninit-use-device-clause.f95
===================================================================
--- testsuite/gfortran.dg/goacc/uninit-use-device-clause.f95	(revision 238751)
+++ testsuite/gfortran.dg/goacc/uninit-use-device-clause.f95	(working copy)
@@ -2,9 +2,9 @@ 
 ! { dg-additional-options "-Wuninitialized" }
 
 subroutine test
-  integer :: i
+  integer, pointer :: p
 
-  !$acc host_data use_device(i) ! { dg-warning "is used uninitialized in this function" }
+  !$acc host_data use_device(p) ! { dg-warning "is used uninitialized in this function" }
   !$acc end host_data
 end subroutine test
 
Index: testsuite/gfortran.dg/goacc/list.f95
===================================================================
--- testsuite/gfortran.dg/goacc/list.f95	(revision 238751)
+++ testsuite/gfortran.dg/goacc/list.f95	(working copy)
@@ -76,19 +76,19 @@  program test
   !$acc parallel private (i) firstprivate (i) ! { dg-error "present on multiple clauses" }
   !$acc end parallel
 
-  !$acc host_data use_device(i)
+  !$acc host_data use_device(i) ! { dg-error "neither a POINTER nor an array" }
   !$acc end host_data
 
-  !$acc host_data use_device(c, d)
+  !$acc host_data use_device(c, d) ! { dg-error "neither a POINTER nor an array" }
   !$acc end host_data
 
   !$acc host_data use_device(a)
   !$acc end host_data
 
-  !$acc host_data use_device(i, j, k, l, a)
+  !$acc host_data use_device(i, j, k, l, a) ! { dg-error "neither a POINTER nor an array" }
   !$acc end host_data  
 
-  !$acc host_data use_device (i) use_device (j)
+  !$acc host_data use_device (i) use_device (j) ! { dg-error "neither a POINTER nor an array" }
   !$acc end host_data
 
   !$acc host_data use_device ! { dg-error "Unclassifiable OpenACC directive" }
@@ -99,13 +99,17 @@  program test
 
   !$acc host_data use_device(10) ! { dg-error "Syntax error" }
 
-  !$acc host_data use_device(/b/, /b/) ! { dg-error "present on multiple clauses" }
+  !$acc host_data use_device(/b/, /b/)
   !$acc end host_data
+  ! { dg-error "neither a POINTER nor an array" "" { target *-*-* } 102 }
+  ! { dg-error "present on multiple clauses" "" { target *-*-* } 102 }
 
-  !$acc host_data use_device(i, j, i) ! { dg-error "present on multiple clauses" }
+  !$acc host_data use_device(i, j, i)
   !$acc end host_data
+  ! { dg-error "neither a POINTER nor an array" "" { target *-*-* } 107 }
+  ! { dg-error "present on multiple clauses" "" { target *-*-* } 107 }
 
-  !$acc host_data use_device(p1) ! { dg-error "POINTER" }
+  !$acc host_data use_device(p1)
   !$acc end host_data
 
 end program test
Index: testsuite/gfortran.dg/goacc/host_data-tree.f95
===================================================================
--- testsuite/gfortran.dg/goacc/host_data-tree.f95	(revision 238751)
+++ testsuite/gfortran.dg/goacc/host_data-tree.f95	(working copy)
@@ -3,9 +3,9 @@ 
 
 program test
   implicit none
-  integer :: i = 1
+  integer, pointer :: p
 
-  !$acc host_data use_device(i)
+  !$acc host_data use_device(p)
   !$acc end host_data
 end program test
-! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "pragma acc host_data use_device_ptr\\(i\\)" 1 "original" } }
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "pragma acc host_data use_device_ptr\\(p\\)" 1 "original" } }