@@ -1182,8 +1182,12 @@ package body Sem_Aggr is
elsif Is_Array_Type (Typ) and then Null_Record_Present (N) then
Error_Msg_N ("null record forbidden in array aggregate", N);
+ elsif Is_Record_Type (Typ)
+ and then not Is_Homogeneous_Aggregate (N)
+ then
+ Resolve_Record_Aggregate (N, Typ);
+
elsif Has_Aspect (Typ, Aspect_Aggregate)
- and then Ekind (Typ) /= E_Record_Type
and then Ada_Version >= Ada_2022
then
-- Check for Ada 2022 and () aggregate.
@@ -1194,22 +1198,6 @@ package body Sem_Aggr is
Resolve_Container_Aggregate (N, Typ);
- -- Check Ada 2022 empty aggregate [] initializing a record type that has
- -- aspect aggregate; the empty aggregate will be expanded into a call to
- -- the empty function specified in the aspect aggregate.
-
- elsif Has_Aspect (Typ, Aspect_Aggregate)
- and then Ekind (Typ) = E_Record_Type
- and then Is_Homogeneous_Aggregate (N)
- and then Is_Empty_List (Expressions (N))
- and then Is_Empty_List (Component_Associations (N))
- and then Ada_Version >= Ada_2022
- then
- Resolve_Container_Aggregate (N, Typ);
-
- elsif Is_Record_Type (Typ) then
- Resolve_Record_Aggregate (N, Typ);
-
elsif Is_Array_Type (Typ) then
-- First a special test, for the case of a positional aggregate of
From: Gary Dismukes <dismukes@adacore.com> When a container aggregate for a predefined container type (such as a Vector type) that has an iterated component association occurs within a generic unit and that generic is instantiated, the compiler reports a spurious error message "iterated component association can only appear in an array aggregate" and the compilation aborts (because Unrecoverable_Error is raised unconditionally after that error). The problem is that as part of the instantiation process, for aggregates whose type has a partial view, in Copy_Generic_Node the compiler switches the visibility so that the full view of the type is available, and for a type whose full view is a record type this leads to incorrectly trying to process the aggregate as a record aggregate in Resolve_Aggregate (making a call to Resolve_Record_Aggregate). Rather than trying to address this by changing what Copy_Generic_Node does, this can be fixed by reordering and adjusting the code in Resolve_Aggregate, so that we first test whether we need to resolve as a record aggregate (if the aggregate is not homogeneous), followed by testing whether the type has an Aggregate aspect and calling Resolve_Container_Aggregate. As a bonus, we also remove the subsequent complex condition and redundant code for handling null container aggregates. gcc/ada/ * sem_aggr.adb (Resolve_Aggregate): Move condition and call for Resolve_Record_Aggregate in front of code related to calling Resolve_Container_Aggregate (and add test that the aggregate is not homogeneous), and remove special-case testing and call to Resolve_Container_Aggregate for empty aggregates. Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on master. --- gcc/ada/sem_aggr.adb | 22 +++++----------------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)