@@ -17381,8 +17381,6 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
Sz : Unat;
begin
- Reinit_Alignment (T);
-
-- Find the minimum standard size (8,16,32,64,128) that fits
Lo := Enumeration_Rep (Entity (Type_Low_Bound (T)));
@@ -79,8 +79,7 @@ package Sem_Ch13 is
procedure Set_Enum_Esize (T : Entity_Id);
-- This routine sets the Esize field for an enumeration type T, based
-- on the current representation information available for T. Note that
- -- the setting of the RM_Size field is not affected. This routine also
- -- initializes the alignment field to zero.
+ -- the setting of the RM_Size field is not affected.
Unknown_Minimum_Size : constant Nonzero_Int := -1;
From: Bob Duff <duff@adacore.com> This patch fixes a bug: if "for T'Alignment use..." is followed by "for T use (<enum rep>);" the compiler crashes. A workaround is to move the alignment clause after the enumeration rep clause. gcc/ada/ * sem_ch13.ads (Set_Enum_Esize): Do not set alignment. * sem_ch13.adb (Set_Enum_Esize): Do not set alignment. Archaeology seems to show that this line of code dates from when "Alignment = 0" meant "the Alignment is not known at compile time" and "the Alignment is not yet known at compile time" as well as "the Alignment is zero". In any case, it seems to be unnecessary, and in this case harmful, because gigi would crash. Alignment_Clause is set (because there is one), so gigi would query the Alignment, but Alignment was destroyed. Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on master. --- gcc/ada/sem_ch13.adb | 2 -- gcc/ada/sem_ch13.ads | 3 +-- 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)