| Message ID | 20230531061723.18019-1-shiyulong@iscas.ac.cn |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [V1] Testsuite: Fix a fail about xtheadcondmov-indirect-rv64.c | expand |
Could you use something like *[a-x0-9]+ for those operands to prevent us hitting that issue again? Ref: https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/binop_vx_constraint-136.c#L9 On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 2:18 PM <shiyulong@iscas.ac.cn> wrote: > > From: yulong <shiyulong@iscas.ac.cn> > > I find fail of the xtheadcondmov-indirect-rv64.c test case and provide the way to solve it. > In this patch, I modify the check information of the function(ConEmv_imm_imm_reg and ConNmv_imm_imm_reg) body. > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > * gcc.target/riscv/xtheadcondmov-indirect-rv64.c:Modify > > --- > gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/xtheadcondmov-indirect-rv64.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/xtheadcondmov-indirect-rv64.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/xtheadcondmov-indirect-rv64.c > index 99956f8496c..dda0f902c32 100644 > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/xtheadcondmov-indirect-rv64.c > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/xtheadcondmov-indirect-rv64.c > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ int ConEmv_imm_imm_reg(int x, int y){ > > /* > **ConEmv_imm_reg_reg: > -** addi a0,a0,-1000 > +** addi a5,a0,-1000 > ** th.mveqz a2,a1,a5 > ** mv a0,a2 > ** ret > @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ int ConNmv_imm_imm_reg(int x, int y){ > > /* > **ConNmv_imm_reg_reg: > -** addi a5,a0,-1000 > +** addi a0,a0,-1000 > ** th.mvnez a2,a1,a0 > ** mv a0,a2 > ** ret > -- > 2.25.1 >
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/xtheadcondmov-indirect-rv64.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/xtheadcondmov-indirect-rv64.c index 99956f8496c..dda0f902c32 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/xtheadcondmov-indirect-rv64.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/xtheadcondmov-indirect-rv64.c @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ int ConEmv_imm_imm_reg(int x, int y){ /* **ConEmv_imm_reg_reg: -** addi a0,a0,-1000 +** addi a5,a0,-1000 ** th.mveqz a2,a1,a5 ** mv a0,a2 ** ret @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ int ConNmv_imm_imm_reg(int x, int y){ /* **ConNmv_imm_reg_reg: -** addi a5,a0,-1000 +** addi a0,a0,-1000 ** th.mvnez a2,a1,a0 ** mv a0,a2 ** ret
From: yulong <shiyulong@iscas.ac.cn> I find fail of the xtheadcondmov-indirect-rv64.c test case and provide the way to solve it. In this patch, I modify the check information of the function(ConEmv_imm_imm_reg and ConNmv_imm_imm_reg) body. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.target/riscv/xtheadcondmov-indirect-rv64.c:Modify --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/xtheadcondmov-indirect-rv64.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)