diff mbox series

c++: Lost deprecated/unavailable attr in class tmpl [PR104682]

Message ID 20220225215921.324060-1-polacek@redhat.com
State New
Headers show
Series c++: Lost deprecated/unavailable attr in class tmpl [PR104682] | expand

Commit Message

Marek Polacek Feb. 25, 2022, 9:59 p.m. UTC
[ Most likely a GCC 13 patch, but I'm posting it now so that I don't lose it. ]

When looking into the other PR I noticed that we fail to give a warning
for a deprecated enumerator when the enum is in a class template.  This
only happens when the attribute doesn't have an argument.  The reason is
that when we tsubst_enum, we create a new enumerator:

      build_enumerator (DECL_NAME (decl), value, newtag,
           DECL_ATTRIBUTES (decl), DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (decl));

but DECL_ATTRIBUTES (decl) is null when the attribute was provided
without an argument -- in that case it simply melts into a tree flag.
handle_deprecated_attribute has:

      if (!args)
         *no_add_attrs = true;

so the attribute isn't retained and we lose it when tsubsting.  Same
thing when the attribute is on the enum itself.

Attribute unavailable is a similar case, but it's different in that
it can be a late attribute whereas "deprecated" can't:
is_late_template_attribute has

                /* But some attributes specifically apply to templates.  */
                && !is_attribute_p ("abi_tag", name)
                && !is_attribute_p ("deprecated", name)
                && !is_attribute_p ("visibility", name))
         return true;
       else
         return false;

which looks strange, but attr-unavailable-9.C tests that we don't error when
the attribute is applied on a template.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.

	PR c++/104682

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

	* cp-tree.h (build_enumerator): Adjust.
	* decl.cc (finish_enum): Make it return the new decl.
	* pt.cc (tsubst_enum): Propagate TREE_DEPRECATED and TREE_UNAVAILABLE.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* g++.dg/ext/attr-unavailable-10.C: New test.
	* g++.dg/ext/attr-unavailable-11.C: New test.
	* g++.dg/warn/deprecated-17.C: New test.
	* g++.dg/warn/deprecated-18.C: New test.
---
 gcc/cp/cp-tree.h                              |  2 +-
 gcc/cp/decl.cc                                |  4 +-
 gcc/cp/pt.cc                                  | 17 +++++++--
 .../g++.dg/ext/attr-unavailable-10.C          | 22 +++++++++++
 .../g++.dg/ext/attr-unavailable-11.C          | 22 +++++++++++
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/deprecated-17.C     | 35 ++++++++++++++++++
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/deprecated-18.C     | 37 +++++++++++++++++++
 7 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-unavailable-10.C
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-unavailable-11.C
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/deprecated-17.C
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/deprecated-18.C


base-commit: f62115c9b770a66c5378f78a2d5866243d560573

Comments

Jason Merrill Feb. 28, 2022, 4:13 p.m. UTC | #1
On 2/25/22 17:59, Marek Polacek wrote:
> [ Most likely a GCC 13 patch, but I'm posting it now so that I don't lose it. ]
> 
> When looking into the other PR I noticed that we fail to give a warning
> for a deprecated enumerator when the enum is in a class template.  This
> only happens when the attribute doesn't have an argument.  The reason is
> that when we tsubst_enum, we create a new enumerator:
> 
>        build_enumerator (DECL_NAME (decl), value, newtag,
>             DECL_ATTRIBUTES (decl), DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (decl));
> 
> but DECL_ATTRIBUTES (decl) is null when the attribute was provided
> without an argument -- in that case it simply melts into a tree flag.
> handle_deprecated_attribute has:
> 
>        if (!args)
>           *no_add_attrs = true;
> 
> so the attribute isn't retained and we lose it when tsubsting.  Same
> thing when the attribute is on the enum itself.
> 
> Attribute unavailable is a similar case, but it's different in that
> it can be a late attribute whereas "deprecated" can't:

Iain, was this difference intentional?

> is_late_template_attribute has
> 
>                  /* But some attributes specifically apply to templates.  */
>                  && !is_attribute_p ("abi_tag", name)
>                  && !is_attribute_p ("deprecated", name)
>                  && !is_attribute_p ("visibility", name))
>           return true;
>         else
>           return false;
> 
> which looks strange, but attr-unavailable-9.C tests that we don't error when
> the attribute is applied on a template.
> 
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.

This looks extremely safe, so let's go ahead and apply it to trunk.

> 	PR c++/104682
> 
> gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
> 
> 	* cp-tree.h (build_enumerator): Adjust.
> 	* decl.cc (finish_enum): Make it return the new decl.
> 	* pt.cc (tsubst_enum): Propagate TREE_DEPRECATED and TREE_UNAVAILABLE.
> 
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> 
> 	* g++.dg/ext/attr-unavailable-10.C: New test.
> 	* g++.dg/ext/attr-unavailable-11.C: New test.
> 	* g++.dg/warn/deprecated-17.C: New test.
> 	* g++.dg/warn/deprecated-18.C: New test.
> ---
>   gcc/cp/cp-tree.h                              |  2 +-
>   gcc/cp/decl.cc                                |  4 +-
>   gcc/cp/pt.cc                                  | 17 +++++++--
>   .../g++.dg/ext/attr-unavailable-10.C          | 22 +++++++++++
>   .../g++.dg/ext/attr-unavailable-11.C          | 22 +++++++++++
>   gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/deprecated-17.C     | 35 ++++++++++++++++++
>   gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/deprecated-18.C     | 37 +++++++++++++++++++
>   7 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>   create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-unavailable-10.C
>   create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-unavailable-11.C
>   create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/deprecated-17.C
>   create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/deprecated-18.C
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
> index 37d462fca6e..80994e94793 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
> +++ b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
> @@ -6833,7 +6833,7 @@ extern void xref_basetypes			(tree, tree);
>   extern tree start_enum				(tree, tree, tree, tree, bool, bool *);
>   extern void finish_enum_value_list		(tree);
>   extern void finish_enum				(tree);
> -extern void build_enumerator			(tree, tree, tree, tree, location_t);
> +extern tree build_enumerator			(tree, tree, tree, tree, location_t);
>   extern tree lookup_enumerator			(tree, tree);
>   extern bool start_preparsed_function		(tree, tree, int);
>   extern bool start_function			(cp_decl_specifier_seq *,
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.cc b/gcc/cp/decl.cc
> index 7b48b56231b..7f80f9d4d7a 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/decl.cc
> +++ b/gcc/cp/decl.cc
> @@ -16409,7 +16409,7 @@ finish_enum (tree enumtype)
>      Apply ATTRIBUTES if available.  LOC is the location of NAME.
>      Assignment of sequential values by default is handled here.  */
>   
> -void
> +tree
>   build_enumerator (tree name, tree value, tree enumtype, tree attributes,
>   		  location_t loc)
>   {
> @@ -16611,6 +16611,8 @@ incremented enumerator value is too large for %<long%>"));
>   
>     /* Add this enumeration constant to the list for this type.  */
>     TYPE_VALUES (enumtype) = tree_cons (name, decl, TYPE_VALUES (enumtype));
> +
> +  return decl;
>   }
>   
>   /* Look for an enumerator with the given NAME within the enumeration
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.cc b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
> index 70f02db8757..8fb17349ee1 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/pt.cc
> +++ b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
> @@ -26944,9 +26944,8 @@ tsubst_enum (tree tag, tree newtag, tree args)
>     for (e = TYPE_VALUES (tag); e; e = TREE_CHAIN (e))
>       {
>         tree value;
> -      tree decl;
> +      tree decl = TREE_VALUE (e);
>   
> -      decl = TREE_VALUE (e);
>         /* Note that in a template enum, the TREE_VALUE is the
>   	 CONST_DECL, not the corresponding INTEGER_CST.  */
>         value = tsubst_expr (DECL_INITIAL (decl),
> @@ -26958,8 +26957,14 @@ tsubst_enum (tree tag, tree newtag, tree args)
>   
>         /* Actually build the enumerator itself.  Here we're assuming that
>   	 enumerators can't have dependent attributes.  */
> -      build_enumerator (DECL_NAME (decl), value, newtag,
> -			DECL_ATTRIBUTES (decl), DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (decl));
> +      tree newdecl = build_enumerator (DECL_NAME (decl), value, newtag,
> +				       DECL_ATTRIBUTES (decl),
> +				       DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (decl));
> +      /* Attribute deprecated without an argument isn't sticky: it'll
> +	 melt into a tree flag, so we need to propagate the flag here,
> +	 since we just created a new enumerator.  */
> +      TREE_DEPRECATED (newdecl) = TREE_DEPRECATED (decl);
> +      TREE_UNAVAILABLE (newdecl) = TREE_UNAVAILABLE (decl);
>       }
>   
>     if (SCOPED_ENUM_P (newtag))
> @@ -26970,6 +26975,10 @@ tsubst_enum (tree tag, tree newtag, tree args)
>   
>     DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (TYPE_NAME (newtag))
>       = DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (TYPE_NAME (tag));
> +  TREE_DEPRECATED (newtag) = TREE_DEPRECATED (tag);
> +  /* We don't need to propagate TREE_UNAVAILABLE here, because it is, unlike
> +     deprecated, applied at instantiation time rather than template
> +     definition time.  */
>   }
>   
>   /* DECL is a FUNCTION_DECL that is a template specialization.  Return
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-unavailable-10.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-unavailable-10.C
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..cfb99476b9f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-unavailable-10.C
> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
> +// PR c++/104682
> +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
> +
> +template<typename>
> +struct S {
> +  enum E1 {
> +    A __attribute__((unavailable))
> +  };
> +};
> +
> +struct S2 {
> +  enum E2 {
> +    A __attribute__((unavailable))
> +  };
> +};
> +
> +void
> +g ()
> +{
> +  auto a1 = S<int>::E1::A; // { dg-error "is unavailable" }
> +  auto b1 = S2::E2::A; // { dg-error "is unavailable" }
> +}
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-unavailable-11.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-unavailable-11.C
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..fce24528908
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-unavailable-11.C
> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
> +// PR c++/104682
> +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
> +
> +template<typename>
> +struct S {
> +  enum B {
> +    A
> +  } __attribute__((unavailable)) ;
> +};
> +
> +struct S2 {
> +  enum B {
> +    A
> +  } __attribute__((unavailable));
> +};
> +
> +void
> +g ()
> +{
> +  S<int>::B a1; // { dg-error "is unavailable" }
> +  S2::B a2; // { dg-error "is unavailable" }
> +}
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/deprecated-17.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/deprecated-17.C
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..c4e768538fa
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/deprecated-17.C
> @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
> +// PR c++/104682
> +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
> +
> +template<typename>
> +struct S {
> +  enum E1 {
> +    A __attribute__((deprecated)),
> +    B __attribute__((deprecated("B"))),
> +    C [[deprecated]],
> +    D [[deprecated("D")]]
> +  };
> +};
> +
> +struct S2 {
> +  enum E2 {
> +    A __attribute__((deprecated)),
> +    B __attribute__((deprecated("B"))),
> +    C [[deprecated]],
> +    D [[deprecated("D")]]
> +  };
> +};
> +
> +void
> +g ()
> +{
> +  auto a1 = S<int>::E1::A; // { dg-warning "is deprecated" }
> +  auto a2 = S<int>::E1::B; // { dg-warning "is deprecated" }
> +  auto a3 = S<int>::E1::C; // { dg-warning "is deprecated" }
> +  auto a4 = S<int>::E1::D; // { dg-warning "is deprecated" }
> +
> +  auto b1 = S2::A; // { dg-warning "is deprecated" }
> +  auto b2 = S2::B; // { dg-warning "is deprecated" }
> +  auto b3 = S2::C; // { dg-warning "is deprecated" }
> +  auto b4 = S2::D; // { dg-warning "is deprecated" }
> +}
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/deprecated-18.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/deprecated-18.C
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..0d101a9cc90
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/deprecated-18.C
> @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
> +// PR c++/104682
> +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
> +
> +template<typename>
> +struct S {
> +  enum B {
> +    A
> +  } __attribute__((deprecated)) ;
> +};
> +
> +struct S2 {
> +  enum B {
> +    A
> +  } __attribute__((deprecated));
> +};
> +
> +template<typename>
> +struct S3 {
> +  enum [[deprecated]] B {
> +    A
> +  };
> +};
> +
> +struct S4 {
> +  enum [[deprecated]] B {
> +    A
> +  };
> +};
> +
> +void
> +g ()
> +{
> +  S<int>::B a1; // { dg-warning "is deprecated" }
> +  S2::B a2; // { dg-warning "is deprecated" }
> +  S3<int>::B a3; // { dg-warning "is deprecated" }
> +  S4::B a4; // { dg-warning "is deprecated" }
> +}
> 
> base-commit: f62115c9b770a66c5378f78a2d5866243d560573
Marek Polacek Feb. 28, 2022, 4:18 p.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 12:13:36PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 2/25/22 17:59, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > [ Most likely a GCC 13 patch, but I'm posting it now so that I don't lose it. ]
> > 
> > When looking into the other PR I noticed that we fail to give a warning
> > for a deprecated enumerator when the enum is in a class template.  This
> > only happens when the attribute doesn't have an argument.  The reason is
> > that when we tsubst_enum, we create a new enumerator:
> > 
> >        build_enumerator (DECL_NAME (decl), value, newtag,
> >             DECL_ATTRIBUTES (decl), DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (decl));
> > 
> > but DECL_ATTRIBUTES (decl) is null when the attribute was provided
> > without an argument -- in that case it simply melts into a tree flag.
> > handle_deprecated_attribute has:
> > 
> >        if (!args)
> >           *no_add_attrs = true;
> > 
> > so the attribute isn't retained and we lose it when tsubsting.  Same
> > thing when the attribute is on the enum itself.
> > 
> > Attribute unavailable is a similar case, but it's different in that
> > it can be a late attribute whereas "deprecated" can't:
> 
> Iain, was this difference intentional?

FWIW, I'm in favor of treating deprecated/unavailable the same, that is,
adding unavailable...

> > is_late_template_attribute has
> > 
> >                  /* But some attributes specifically apply to templates.  */
> >                  && !is_attribute_p ("abi_tag", name)
> >                  && !is_attribute_p ("deprecated", name)

...here.  But that really does seem like a GCC 13 change.

> >                  && !is_attribute_p ("visibility", name))
> >           return true;
> >         else
> >           return false;
> > 
> > which looks strange, but attr-unavailable-9.C tests that we don't error when
> > the attribute is applied on a template.
> > 
> > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
> 
> This looks extremely safe, so let's go ahead and apply it to trunk.

Will do, thanks.

Marek
Iain Sandoe Feb. 28, 2022, 4:30 p.m. UTC | #3
> On 28 Feb 2022, at 16:13, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> On 2/25/22 17:59, Marek Polacek wrote:
>> [ Most likely a GCC 13 patch, but I'm posting it now so that I don't lose it. ]
>> When looking into the other PR I noticed that we fail to give a warning
>> for a deprecated enumerator when the enum is in a class template.  This
>> only happens when the attribute doesn't have an argument.  The reason is
>> that when we tsubst_enum, we create a new enumerator:
>>       build_enumerator (DECL_NAME (decl), value, newtag,
>>            DECL_ATTRIBUTES (decl), DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (decl));
>> but DECL_ATTRIBUTES (decl) is null when the attribute was provided
>> without an argument -- in that case it simply melts into a tree flag.
>> handle_deprecated_attribute has:
>>       if (!args)
>>          *no_add_attrs = true;
>> so the attribute isn't retained and we lose it when tsubsting.  Same
>> thing when the attribute is on the enum itself.
>> Attribute unavailable is a similar case, but it's different in that
>> it can be a late attribute whereas "deprecated" can't:
> 
> Iain, was this difference intentional?

The intent was to treat the two attributes the same way - so any difference
is unintentional.

Iain

> 
>> is_late_template_attribute has
>>                 /* But some attributes specifically apply to templates.  */
>>                 && !is_attribute_p ("abi_tag", name)
>>                 && !is_attribute_p ("deprecated", name)
>>                 && !is_attribute_p ("visibility", name))
>>          return true;
>>        else
>>          return false;
>> which looks strange, but attr-unavailable-9.C tests that we don't error when
>> the attribute is applied on a template.
>> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
> 
> This looks extremely safe, so let's go ahead and apply it to trunk.
> 
>> 	PR c++/104682
>> gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
>> 	* cp-tree.h (build_enumerator): Adjust.
>> 	* decl.cc (finish_enum): Make it return the new decl.
>> 	* pt.cc (tsubst_enum): Propagate TREE_DEPRECATED and TREE_UNAVAILABLE.
>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>> 	* g++.dg/ext/attr-unavailable-10.C: New test.
>> 	* g++.dg/ext/attr-unavailable-11.C: New test.
>> 	* g++.dg/warn/deprecated-17.C: New test.
>> 	* g++.dg/warn/deprecated-18.C: New test.
>> ---
>>  gcc/cp/cp-tree.h                              |  2 +-
>>  gcc/cp/decl.cc                                |  4 +-
>>  gcc/cp/pt.cc                                  | 17 +++++++--
>>  .../g++.dg/ext/attr-unavailable-10.C          | 22 +++++++++++
>>  .../g++.dg/ext/attr-unavailable-11.C          | 22 +++++++++++
>>  gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/deprecated-17.C     | 35 ++++++++++++++++++
>>  gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/deprecated-18.C     | 37 +++++++++++++++++++
>>  7 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-unavailable-10.C
>>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-unavailable-11.C
>>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/deprecated-17.C
>>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/deprecated-18.C
>> diff --git a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
>> index 37d462fca6e..80994e94793 100644
>> --- a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
>> +++ b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
>> @@ -6833,7 +6833,7 @@ extern void xref_basetypes			(tree, tree);
>>  extern tree start_enum				(tree, tree, tree, tree, bool, bool *);
>>  extern void finish_enum_value_list		(tree);
>>  extern void finish_enum				(tree);
>> -extern void build_enumerator			(tree, tree, tree, tree, location_t);
>> +extern tree build_enumerator			(tree, tree, tree, tree, location_t);
>>  extern tree lookup_enumerator			(tree, tree);
>>  extern bool start_preparsed_function		(tree, tree, int);
>>  extern bool start_function			(cp_decl_specifier_seq *,
>> diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.cc b/gcc/cp/decl.cc
>> index 7b48b56231b..7f80f9d4d7a 100644
>> --- a/gcc/cp/decl.cc
>> +++ b/gcc/cp/decl.cc
>> @@ -16409,7 +16409,7 @@ finish_enum (tree enumtype)
>>     Apply ATTRIBUTES if available.  LOC is the location of NAME.
>>     Assignment of sequential values by default is handled here.  */
>>  -void
>> +tree
>>  build_enumerator (tree name, tree value, tree enumtype, tree attributes,
>>  		  location_t loc)
>>  {
>> @@ -16611,6 +16611,8 @@ incremented enumerator value is too large for %<long%>"));
>>      /* Add this enumeration constant to the list for this type.  */
>>    TYPE_VALUES (enumtype) = tree_cons (name, decl, TYPE_VALUES (enumtype));
>> +
>> +  return decl;
>>  }
>>    /* Look for an enumerator with the given NAME within the enumeration
>> diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.cc b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
>> index 70f02db8757..8fb17349ee1 100644
>> --- a/gcc/cp/pt.cc
>> +++ b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
>> @@ -26944,9 +26944,8 @@ tsubst_enum (tree tag, tree newtag, tree args)
>>    for (e = TYPE_VALUES (tag); e; e = TREE_CHAIN (e))
>>      {
>>        tree value;
>> -      tree decl;
>> +      tree decl = TREE_VALUE (e);
>>  -      decl = TREE_VALUE (e);
>>        /* Note that in a template enum, the TREE_VALUE is the
>>  	 CONST_DECL, not the corresponding INTEGER_CST.  */
>>        value = tsubst_expr (DECL_INITIAL (decl),
>> @@ -26958,8 +26957,14 @@ tsubst_enum (tree tag, tree newtag, tree args)
>>          /* Actually build the enumerator itself.  Here we're assuming that
>>  	 enumerators can't have dependent attributes.  */
>> -      build_enumerator (DECL_NAME (decl), value, newtag,
>> -			DECL_ATTRIBUTES (decl), DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (decl));
>> +      tree newdecl = build_enumerator (DECL_NAME (decl), value, newtag,
>> +				       DECL_ATTRIBUTES (decl),
>> +				       DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (decl));
>> +      /* Attribute deprecated without an argument isn't sticky: it'll
>> +	 melt into a tree flag, so we need to propagate the flag here,
>> +	 since we just created a new enumerator.  */
>> +      TREE_DEPRECATED (newdecl) = TREE_DEPRECATED (decl);
>> +      TREE_UNAVAILABLE (newdecl) = TREE_UNAVAILABLE (decl);
>>      }
>>      if (SCOPED_ENUM_P (newtag))
>> @@ -26970,6 +26975,10 @@ tsubst_enum (tree tag, tree newtag, tree args)
>>      DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (TYPE_NAME (newtag))
>>      = DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (TYPE_NAME (tag));
>> +  TREE_DEPRECATED (newtag) = TREE_DEPRECATED (tag);
>> +  /* We don't need to propagate TREE_UNAVAILABLE here, because it is, unlike
>> +     deprecated, applied at instantiation time rather than template
>> +     definition time.  */
>>  }
>>    /* DECL is a FUNCTION_DECL that is a template specialization.  Return
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-unavailable-10.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-unavailable-10.C
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 00000000000..cfb99476b9f
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-unavailable-10.C
>> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
>> +// PR c++/104682
>> +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
>> +
>> +template<typename>
>> +struct S {
>> +  enum E1 {
>> +    A __attribute__((unavailable))
>> +  };
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct S2 {
>> +  enum E2 {
>> +    A __attribute__((unavailable))
>> +  };
>> +};
>> +
>> +void
>> +g ()
>> +{
>> +  auto a1 = S<int>::E1::A; // { dg-error "is unavailable" }
>> +  auto b1 = S2::E2::A; // { dg-error "is unavailable" }
>> +}
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-unavailable-11.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-unavailable-11.C
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 00000000000..fce24528908
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-unavailable-11.C
>> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
>> +// PR c++/104682
>> +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
>> +
>> +template<typename>
>> +struct S {
>> +  enum B {
>> +    A
>> +  } __attribute__((unavailable)) ;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct S2 {
>> +  enum B {
>> +    A
>> +  } __attribute__((unavailable));
>> +};
>> +
>> +void
>> +g ()
>> +{
>> +  S<int>::B a1; // { dg-error "is unavailable" }
>> +  S2::B a2; // { dg-error "is unavailable" }
>> +}
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/deprecated-17.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/deprecated-17.C
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 00000000000..c4e768538fa
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/deprecated-17.C
>> @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
>> +// PR c++/104682
>> +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
>> +
>> +template<typename>
>> +struct S {
>> +  enum E1 {
>> +    A __attribute__((deprecated)),
>> +    B __attribute__((deprecated("B"))),
>> +    C [[deprecated]],
>> +    D [[deprecated("D")]]
>> +  };
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct S2 {
>> +  enum E2 {
>> +    A __attribute__((deprecated)),
>> +    B __attribute__((deprecated("B"))),
>> +    C [[deprecated]],
>> +    D [[deprecated("D")]]
>> +  };
>> +};
>> +
>> +void
>> +g ()
>> +{
>> +  auto a1 = S<int>::E1::A; // { dg-warning "is deprecated" }
>> +  auto a2 = S<int>::E1::B; // { dg-warning "is deprecated" }
>> +  auto a3 = S<int>::E1::C; // { dg-warning "is deprecated" }
>> +  auto a4 = S<int>::E1::D; // { dg-warning "is deprecated" }
>> +
>> +  auto b1 = S2::A; // { dg-warning "is deprecated" }
>> +  auto b2 = S2::B; // { dg-warning "is deprecated" }
>> +  auto b3 = S2::C; // { dg-warning "is deprecated" }
>> +  auto b4 = S2::D; // { dg-warning "is deprecated" }
>> +}
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/deprecated-18.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/deprecated-18.C
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 00000000000..0d101a9cc90
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/deprecated-18.C
>> @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
>> +// PR c++/104682
>> +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
>> +
>> +template<typename>
>> +struct S {
>> +  enum B {
>> +    A
>> +  } __attribute__((deprecated)) ;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct S2 {
>> +  enum B {
>> +    A
>> +  } __attribute__((deprecated));
>> +};
>> +
>> +template<typename>
>> +struct S3 {
>> +  enum [[deprecated]] B {
>> +    A
>> +  };
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct S4 {
>> +  enum [[deprecated]] B {
>> +    A
>> +  };
>> +};
>> +
>> +void
>> +g ()
>> +{
>> +  S<int>::B a1; // { dg-warning "is deprecated" }
>> +  S2::B a2; // { dg-warning "is deprecated" }
>> +  S3<int>::B a3; // { dg-warning "is deprecated" }
>> +  S4::B a4; // { dg-warning "is deprecated" }
>> +}
>> base-commit: f62115c9b770a66c5378f78a2d5866243d560573
Marek Polacek Feb. 28, 2022, 4:31 p.m. UTC | #4
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 04:30:01PM +0000, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> 
> 
> > On 28 Feb 2022, at 16:13, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> > On 2/25/22 17:59, Marek Polacek wrote:
> >> [ Most likely a GCC 13 patch, but I'm posting it now so that I don't lose it. ]
> >> When looking into the other PR I noticed that we fail to give a warning
> >> for a deprecated enumerator when the enum is in a class template.  This
> >> only happens when the attribute doesn't have an argument.  The reason is
> >> that when we tsubst_enum, we create a new enumerator:
> >>       build_enumerator (DECL_NAME (decl), value, newtag,
> >>            DECL_ATTRIBUTES (decl), DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (decl));
> >> but DECL_ATTRIBUTES (decl) is null when the attribute was provided
> >> without an argument -- in that case it simply melts into a tree flag.
> >> handle_deprecated_attribute has:
> >>       if (!args)
> >>          *no_add_attrs = true;
> >> so the attribute isn't retained and we lose it when tsubsting.  Same
> >> thing when the attribute is on the enum itself.
> >> Attribute unavailable is a similar case, but it's different in that
> >> it can be a late attribute whereas "deprecated" can't:
> > 
> > Iain, was this difference intentional?
> 
> The intent was to treat the two attributes the same way - so any difference
> is unintentional.

Thanks.  I'll send a patch soon.

Marek
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
index 37d462fca6e..80994e94793 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
+++ b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
@@ -6833,7 +6833,7 @@  extern void xref_basetypes			(tree, tree);
 extern tree start_enum				(tree, tree, tree, tree, bool, bool *);
 extern void finish_enum_value_list		(tree);
 extern void finish_enum				(tree);
-extern void build_enumerator			(tree, tree, tree, tree, location_t);
+extern tree build_enumerator			(tree, tree, tree, tree, location_t);
 extern tree lookup_enumerator			(tree, tree);
 extern bool start_preparsed_function		(tree, tree, int);
 extern bool start_function			(cp_decl_specifier_seq *,
diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.cc b/gcc/cp/decl.cc
index 7b48b56231b..7f80f9d4d7a 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/decl.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/decl.cc
@@ -16409,7 +16409,7 @@  finish_enum (tree enumtype)
    Apply ATTRIBUTES if available.  LOC is the location of NAME.
    Assignment of sequential values by default is handled here.  */
 
-void
+tree
 build_enumerator (tree name, tree value, tree enumtype, tree attributes,
 		  location_t loc)
 {
@@ -16611,6 +16611,8 @@  incremented enumerator value is too large for %<long%>"));
 
   /* Add this enumeration constant to the list for this type.  */
   TYPE_VALUES (enumtype) = tree_cons (name, decl, TYPE_VALUES (enumtype));
+
+  return decl;
 }
 
 /* Look for an enumerator with the given NAME within the enumeration
diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.cc b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
index 70f02db8757..8fb17349ee1 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
@@ -26944,9 +26944,8 @@  tsubst_enum (tree tag, tree newtag, tree args)
   for (e = TYPE_VALUES (tag); e; e = TREE_CHAIN (e))
     {
       tree value;
-      tree decl;
+      tree decl = TREE_VALUE (e);
 
-      decl = TREE_VALUE (e);
       /* Note that in a template enum, the TREE_VALUE is the
 	 CONST_DECL, not the corresponding INTEGER_CST.  */
       value = tsubst_expr (DECL_INITIAL (decl),
@@ -26958,8 +26957,14 @@  tsubst_enum (tree tag, tree newtag, tree args)
 
       /* Actually build the enumerator itself.  Here we're assuming that
 	 enumerators can't have dependent attributes.  */
-      build_enumerator (DECL_NAME (decl), value, newtag,
-			DECL_ATTRIBUTES (decl), DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (decl));
+      tree newdecl = build_enumerator (DECL_NAME (decl), value, newtag,
+				       DECL_ATTRIBUTES (decl),
+				       DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (decl));
+      /* Attribute deprecated without an argument isn't sticky: it'll
+	 melt into a tree flag, so we need to propagate the flag here,
+	 since we just created a new enumerator.  */
+      TREE_DEPRECATED (newdecl) = TREE_DEPRECATED (decl);
+      TREE_UNAVAILABLE (newdecl) = TREE_UNAVAILABLE (decl);
     }
 
   if (SCOPED_ENUM_P (newtag))
@@ -26970,6 +26975,10 @@  tsubst_enum (tree tag, tree newtag, tree args)
 
   DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (TYPE_NAME (newtag))
     = DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (TYPE_NAME (tag));
+  TREE_DEPRECATED (newtag) = TREE_DEPRECATED (tag);
+  /* We don't need to propagate TREE_UNAVAILABLE here, because it is, unlike
+     deprecated, applied at instantiation time rather than template
+     definition time.  */
 }
 
 /* DECL is a FUNCTION_DECL that is a template specialization.  Return
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-unavailable-10.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-unavailable-10.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..cfb99476b9f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-unavailable-10.C
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ 
+// PR c++/104682
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+template<typename>
+struct S {
+  enum E1 {
+    A __attribute__((unavailable))
+  };
+};
+
+struct S2 {
+  enum E2 {
+    A __attribute__((unavailable))
+  };
+};
+
+void
+g ()
+{
+  auto a1 = S<int>::E1::A; // { dg-error "is unavailable" }
+  auto b1 = S2::E2::A; // { dg-error "is unavailable" }
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-unavailable-11.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-unavailable-11.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..fce24528908
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-unavailable-11.C
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ 
+// PR c++/104682
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+template<typename>
+struct S {
+  enum B {
+    A
+  } __attribute__((unavailable)) ;
+};
+
+struct S2 {
+  enum B {
+    A
+  } __attribute__((unavailable));
+};
+
+void
+g ()
+{
+  S<int>::B a1; // { dg-error "is unavailable" }
+  S2::B a2; // { dg-error "is unavailable" }
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/deprecated-17.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/deprecated-17.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c4e768538fa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/deprecated-17.C
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ 
+// PR c++/104682
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+template<typename>
+struct S {
+  enum E1 {
+    A __attribute__((deprecated)),
+    B __attribute__((deprecated("B"))),
+    C [[deprecated]],
+    D [[deprecated("D")]]
+  };
+};
+
+struct S2 {
+  enum E2 {
+    A __attribute__((deprecated)),
+    B __attribute__((deprecated("B"))),
+    C [[deprecated]],
+    D [[deprecated("D")]]
+  };
+};
+
+void
+g ()
+{
+  auto a1 = S<int>::E1::A; // { dg-warning "is deprecated" }
+  auto a2 = S<int>::E1::B; // { dg-warning "is deprecated" }
+  auto a3 = S<int>::E1::C; // { dg-warning "is deprecated" }
+  auto a4 = S<int>::E1::D; // { dg-warning "is deprecated" }
+  
+  auto b1 = S2::A; // { dg-warning "is deprecated" }
+  auto b2 = S2::B; // { dg-warning "is deprecated" }
+  auto b3 = S2::C; // { dg-warning "is deprecated" }
+  auto b4 = S2::D; // { dg-warning "is deprecated" }
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/deprecated-18.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/deprecated-18.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..0d101a9cc90
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/deprecated-18.C
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ 
+// PR c++/104682
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+template<typename>
+struct S {
+  enum B {
+    A
+  } __attribute__((deprecated)) ;
+};
+
+struct S2 {
+  enum B {
+    A
+  } __attribute__((deprecated));
+};
+
+template<typename>
+struct S3 {
+  enum [[deprecated]] B {
+    A
+  };
+};
+
+struct S4 {
+  enum [[deprecated]] B {
+    A
+  };
+};
+
+void
+g ()
+{
+  S<int>::B a1; // { dg-warning "is deprecated" }
+  S2::B a2; // { dg-warning "is deprecated" }
+  S3<int>::B a3; // { dg-warning "is deprecated" }
+  S4::B a4; // { dg-warning "is deprecated" }
+}