@@ -3693,7 +3693,7 @@ cp_parser_parse_and_diagnose_invalid_type_name (cp_parser *parser)
/*template_keyword_p=*/false,
/*check_dependency_p=*/true,
/*template_p=*/NULL,
- /*declarator_p=*/false,
+ /*declarator_p=*/true,
/*optional_p=*/false);
/* If the next token is a (, this is a function with no explicit return
type, i.e. constructor, destructor or conversion op. */
@@ -6605,6 +6605,8 @@ check_template_keyword_in_nested_name_spec (tree name)
it unchanged if there is no nested-name-specifier. Returns the new
scope iff there is a nested-name-specifier, or NULL_TREE otherwise.
+ If CHECK_DEPENDENCY_P is FALSE, names are looked up in dependent scopes.
+
If IS_DECLARATION is TRUE, the nested-name-specifier is known to be
part of a declaration and/or decl-specifier. */
@@ -6645,9 +6647,10 @@ cp_parser_nested_name_specifier_opt (cp_parser *parser,
/* Grab the nested-name-specifier and continue the loop. */
cp_parser_pre_parsed_nested_name_specifier (parser);
/* If we originally encountered this nested-name-specifier
- with IS_DECLARATION set to false, we will not have
+ with CHECK_DEPENDENCY_P set to true, we will not have
resolved TYPENAME_TYPEs, so we must do so here. */
if (is_declaration
+ && !check_dependency_p
&& TREE_CODE (parser->scope) == TYPENAME_TYPE)
{
new_scope = resolve_typename_type (parser->scope,
@@ -6729,6 +6732,7 @@ cp_parser_nested_name_specifier_opt (cp_parser *parser,
a template. So, if we have a typename at this point, we make
an effort to look through it. */
if (is_declaration
+ && !check_dependency_p
&& !typename_keyword_p
&& parser->scope
&& TREE_CODE (parser->scope) == TYPENAME_TYPE)