diff mbox series

[PR94774] tree-optimization: Fix use of uninitialized variable

Message ID 20200427165827.4014766-1-stefansf@linux.ibm.com
State New
Headers show
Series [PR94774] tree-optimization: Fix use of uninitialized variable | expand

Commit Message

Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus April 27, 2020, 4:58 p.m. UTC
Array retval is not necessarily initialized by function is_call_safe and
may be used afterwards.  Thus, initialize it explicitly.

Ok for master?

gcc/ChangeLog:

2020-04-27  Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus  <stefansf@linux.ibm.com>

	PR tree-optimization/94774
	* gimple-ssa-sprintf.c (try_substitute_return_value): Initialize
	variable retval.
---
 gcc/gimple-ssa-sprintf.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Martin Sebor April 28, 2020, 3 p.m. UTC | #1
On 4/27/20 10:58 AM, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote:
> Array retval is not necessarily initialized by function is_call_safe and
> may be used afterwards.  Thus, initialize it explicitly.
> 
> Ok for master?

The change looks (even obviously) good to me but strictly speaking
it needs the approval of a middle end maintainer.

Thanks
Martin

> 
> gcc/ChangeLog:
> 
> 2020-04-27  Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus  <stefansf@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> 	PR tree-optimization/94774
> 	* gimple-ssa-sprintf.c (try_substitute_return_value): Initialize
> 	variable retval.
> ---
>   gcc/gimple-ssa-sprintf.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/gimple-ssa-sprintf.c b/gcc/gimple-ssa-sprintf.c
> index 1879686ce0a..011c3e21e63 100644
> --- a/gcc/gimple-ssa-sprintf.c
> +++ b/gcc/gimple-ssa-sprintf.c
> @@ -4120,7 +4120,7 @@ try_substitute_return_value (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi,
>     bool removed = false;
>   
>     /* The minimum and maximum return value.  */
> -  unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT retval[2];
> +  unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT retval[2] = {0};
>     bool safe = is_call_safe (info, res, true, retval);
>   
>     if (safe
>
Richard Biener April 29, 2020, 6:26 a.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 6:14 PM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> On 4/27/20 10:58 AM, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote:
> > Array retval is not necessarily initialized by function is_call_safe and
> > may be used afterwards.  Thus, initialize it explicitly.
> >
> > Ok for master?
>
> The change looks (even obviously) good to me but strictly speaking
> it needs the approval of a middle end maintainer.

OK.

Richard.

> Thanks
> Martin
>
> >
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> >
> > 2020-04-27  Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus  <stefansf@linux.ibm.com>
> >
> >       PR tree-optimization/94774
> >       * gimple-ssa-sprintf.c (try_substitute_return_value): Initialize
> >       variable retval.
> > ---
> >   gcc/gimple-ssa-sprintf.c | 2 +-
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/gimple-ssa-sprintf.c b/gcc/gimple-ssa-sprintf.c
> > index 1879686ce0a..011c3e21e63 100644
> > --- a/gcc/gimple-ssa-sprintf.c
> > +++ b/gcc/gimple-ssa-sprintf.c
> > @@ -4120,7 +4120,7 @@ try_substitute_return_value (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi,
> >     bool removed = false;
> >
> >     /* The minimum and maximum return value.  */
> > -  unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT retval[2];
> > +  unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT retval[2] = {0};
> >     bool safe = is_call_safe (info, res, true, retval);
> >
> >     if (safe
> >
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/gcc/gimple-ssa-sprintf.c b/gcc/gimple-ssa-sprintf.c
index 1879686ce0a..011c3e21e63 100644
--- a/gcc/gimple-ssa-sprintf.c
+++ b/gcc/gimple-ssa-sprintf.c
@@ -4120,7 +4120,7 @@  try_substitute_return_value (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi,
   bool removed = false;
 
   /* The minimum and maximum return value.  */
-  unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT retval[2];
+  unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT retval[2] = {0};
   bool safe = is_call_safe (info, res, true, retval);
 
   if (safe