Message ID | 20180719094728.GA53182@kam.mff.cuni.cz |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [wwwdocs] Mention LTO link-time issue fixed in gcc 8.2 | expand |
On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, Jan Hubicka wrote: > since we now mention the problem with Intel tuning, I tought we also may > mention the LTO link-time issue that was fixed. It was mentioned by > several folks at the phoronix forum. (Basicaly sometimes the partition > size has overlfown which made partitioner to put every symbol into > separate parition causing fork bomb while streaming and overall very > slow compile times). Thanks, Jan, this looks fine to me. Gerald
On Sat, 21 Jul 2018, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Thanks, Jan, this looks fine to me.
Oops, I missed </h4> closing an <h3>; just followed up on your
commit to fix that.
Gerald
Index: changes.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-8/changes.html,v
retrieving revision 1.90
diff -u -r1.90 changes.html
--- changes.html 21 Jul 2018 19:55:10 -0000 1.90
+++ changes.html 22 Jul 2018 08:25:46 -0000
@@ -1321,7 +1321,7 @@
complete (that is, it is possible that some PRs that have been fixed
are not listed here).</p>
-<h3>General Improvements</h4>
+<h3>General Improvements</h3>
<ul>
<li>Fixed LTO link-time performance problems caused by an overflow
in the partitioning algorithm while building large binaries.</li>
Index: changes.html =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-8/changes.html,v retrieving revision 1.89 diff -u -r1.89 changes.html --- changes.html 15 Jul 2018 12:57:34 -0000 1.89 +++ changes.html 19 Jul 2018 09:45:27 -0000 @@ -1321,6 +1321,12 @@ complete (that is, it is possible that some PRs that have been fixed are not listed here).</p> +<h3>General Improvements</h4> + <ul> + <li>Fixed LTO link-time performance problems caused by an overflow + in the partitioning algorithm while building large binaries.</li> + </ul> + <h3>Target Specific Changes</h3> <h4>IA-32/x86-64</h4>