diff mbox

[Fortran,66927,v2.1,6,Regression] ICE in gfc_conf_procedure_call

Message ID 20151026140411.52cefdbf@vepi2
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Andre Vehreschild Oct. 26, 2015, 1:04 p.m. UTC 
Hi Paul,

thanks for the quick review. Submitted as r229353.

Many thanks and regards,
	Andre

On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 13:04:27 +0100
Paul Richard Thomas <paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Andre,
> 
> Yes, that's good to fix the problem. OK to commit
> 
> Thanks for the rapid fix.
> 
> Paul
> 
> On 26 October 2015 at 11:03, Andre Vehreschild <vehre@gmx.de> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > unfortunately did my last patch create a segfault on some 32-bit
> > system. This happens because in the scalarizer the lower bound of the
> > deferred length array of the source= expression was taken to be
> > constant zero instead of taking that information from the array
> > descriptor. This patch fixes the segfault by taking the lower -- and to
> > keep it in sync also the upper -- bound from the array descriptor when
> > doing the array assign in the allocate ().
> >
> > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-linux-gnu/f21.
> >
> > Ok for trunk?
> >
> > Sorry for the regression.
> >
> > Regards,
> >         Andre
> >
> > On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 13:31:02 +0100
> > Andre Vehreschild <vehre@gmx.de> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Paul, hi all,
> >>
> >> thanks for the review. Submitted as r229294.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>       Andre
> >>
> >> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 08:43:24 +0100
> >> Paul Richard Thomas <paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Dear Andre,
> >> >
> >> > As far as I can see, the problems with PR57117 are specific to RESHAPE
> >> > and need not affect committing your patch. To my surprise, the
> >> > combination of your patch and mine for PR67171 fixes PR67044 in that
> >> > the ICE no longer occurs. I have to get my head around how to write a
> >> > testcase for it that tests the functionality though!
> >> >
> >> > You can commit this patch to trunk. As I said elsewhere, I will rename
> >> > the testcase for PR67171.
> >> >
> >> > Many thanks for the patch.
> >> >
> >> > Paul
> >> >
> >> > On 23 October 2015 at 09:44, Paul Richard Thomas
> >> > <paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > Dear Andre,
> >> > >
> >> > > I will wait until you fix the problems that Dominique has pointed out.
> >> > > However, if by Sunday afternoon (rain forecast!) you haven't found the
> >> > > time, I will see if I can locate the source of these new problems.
> >> > >
> >> > > With best regards
> >> > >
> >> > > Paul
> >> > >
> >> > > On 7 October 2015 at 19:51, Dominique d'Humières <dominiq@lps.ens.fr> wrote:
> >> > >> This patch also fixes pr57117 comment 2, the original test and the test in comment 3 now give an ICE
> >> > >>
> >> > >> pr57117.f90:82:0:
> >> > >>
> >> > >>    allocate(z(9), source=reshape(x, (/ 9 /)))
> >> > >> 1
> >> > >> internal compiler error: Segmentation fault: 11
> >> > >>
> >> > >> and pr67044.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Thanks,
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Dominique
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's
> >> > > too dark to read.
> >> > >
> >> > > Groucho Marx
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de
> 
> 
>
diff mbox

Patch

Index: gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/ChangeLog	(Revision 229352)
+++ gcc/fortran/ChangeLog	(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@ 
+2015-10-26  Andre Vehreschild  <vehre@gcc.gnu.org>
+
+	PR fortran/66927
+	* trans-array.c (evaluate_bound): For deferred length arrays get the
+	bounds directly from the descriptor, i.e., prevent using constant
+	zero lower bound from the gfc_conv_array_lbound () routine.
+	(gfc_conv_section_startstride): Hand deferred array status to
+	evaluate_bound ().
+	(gfc_conv_expr_descriptor): Same.
+
 2015-01-25  Paul Thomas  <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
 
 	PR fortran/67171
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/trans-array.c	(Revision 229352)
+++ gcc/fortran/trans-array.c	(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -3809,7 +3809,7 @@ 
 
 static void
 evaluate_bound (stmtblock_t *block, tree *bounds, gfc_expr ** values,
-		tree desc, int dim, bool lbound)
+		tree desc, int dim, bool lbound, bool deferred)
 {
   gfc_se se;
   gfc_expr * input_val = values[dim];
@@ -3824,6 +3824,17 @@ 
       gfc_add_block_to_block (block, &se.pre);
       *output = se.expr;
     }
+  else if (deferred)
+    {
+      /* The gfc_conv_array_lbound () routine returns a constant zero for
+	 deferred length arrays, which in the scalarizer wrecks havoc, when
+	 copying to a (newly allocated) one-based array.
+	 Keep returning the actual result in sync for both bounds.  */
+      *output = lbound ? gfc_conv_descriptor_lbound_get (desc,
+							 gfc_rank_cst[dim]):
+			 gfc_conv_descriptor_ubound_get (desc,
+							 gfc_rank_cst[dim]);
+    }
   else
     {
       /* No specific bound specified so use the bound of the array.  */
@@ -3864,15 +3875,19 @@ 
   desc = info->descriptor;
   stride = ar->stride[dim];
 
+
   /* Calculate the start of the range.  For vector subscripts this will
      be the range of the vector.  */
-  evaluate_bound (block, info->start, ar->start, desc, dim, true);
+  evaluate_bound (block, info->start, ar->start, desc, dim, true,
+		  ar->as->type == AS_DEFERRED);
 
   /* Similarly calculate the end.  Although this is not used in the
      scalarizer, it is needed when checking bounds and where the end
      is an expression with side-effects.  */
-  evaluate_bound (block, info->end, ar->end, desc, dim, false);
+  evaluate_bound (block, info->end, ar->end, desc, dim, false,
+		  ar->as->type == AS_DEFERRED);
 
+
   /* Calculate the stride.  */
   if (stride == NULL)
     info->stride[dim] = gfc_index_one_node;
@@ -6965,7 +6980,8 @@ 
 
 	  gcc_assert (n == codim - 1);
 	  evaluate_bound (&loop.pre, info->start, ar->start,
-			  info->descriptor, n + ndim, true);
+			  info->descriptor, n + ndim, true,
+			  ar->as->type == AS_DEFERRED);
 	  loop.from[n + loop.dimen] = info->start[n + ndim];
 	}
       else