Message ID | 20130722065749.4v38h8a3cmcs04wo-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Ok. On Jul 22, 2013, at 3:57 AM, Joern Rennecke <joern.rennecke@embecosm.com> wrote: > Quoting Georg-Johann Lay <gjl@gcc.gnu.org>: > >> Joern Rennecke wrote: >>> xfail for avr*-*-* >> >> Hi, >> >> the target machine is avr-*-* because, say, avr32 (a 32-bit MCU not officially >> supported) is a quite different architecture than avr. >> >> Similar for your other testsuite patches with avr*-*-* > > I have attached amended versions of the patches 7/8/9/14. > > tested for avr using --target_board=atmega128-sim . > > <patch7-2.txt><patch8-2.txt><patch9-2.txt><patch14-2.txt>
Index: gcc.dg/pr46647.c =================================================================== --- gcc.dg/pr46647.c (revision 201032) +++ gcc.dg/pr46647.c (working copy) @@ -25,6 +25,6 @@ func3 (void) return 0; } -/* The xfail for cris-* and crisv32-* is due to PR53535. */ -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "memset" "optimized" { xfail cris-*-* crisv32-*-* } } } */ +/* The xfail for avr, cris-* and crisv32-* is due to PR53535. */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "memset" "optimized" { xfail avr-*-* cris-*-* crisv32-*-* } } } */ /* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "optimized" } } */