| Message ID | 20110805224930.0B5161C1EDE@gchare.mtv.corp.google.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 18:49, Gabriel Charette <gchare@google.com> wrote: > This is the test I was talking would potentially fail with our current implementation. > > And it does. > > It has an assembly difference in the order of the global variables, like we used to have in simpler tests. > > Gab > > 2011-08-05 Gabriel Charette <gchare@google.com> > > * (x0hardorder1.h): New. > * (x3hardorder2.h): New. > * (x3hardorder.cc): New. OK. Thanks for the test. Diego.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/x0hardorder1.h b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/x0hardorder1.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..bfb547e --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/x0hardorder1.h @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +#ifndef HARD_ORDER_1_H +#define HARD_ORDER_1_H + +int a1 = 1; + +namespace N { + int n1 = 1; + int m1 = 2; +} + +float b1 = 1.1; + +#endif diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/x3hardorder.cc b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/x3hardorder.cc new file mode 100644 index 0000000..8f62539 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/x3hardorder.cc @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +//pph asm xdiff 28345 +//Ordering of globals is different + +#include "x3hardorder2.h" + +int test () { + return a1 + a2 - b1 + b2 * N::n1 + N::n2 - N::m1 + N::m2; +} diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/x3hardorder2.h b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/x3hardorder2.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d534ae4 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pph/x3hardorder2.h @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +#ifndef HARD_ORDER_2_H +#define HARD_ORDER_2_H + +int a2 = 2; + +namespace N { + int n2 = 3; +} + +#include "x0hardorder1.h" + +float b2 = 2.2; + +namespace N { + int m2 = 3; +} + +#endif