diff mbox

[Ada] Allow static string expression as name of Test_Case pragma/aspect

Message ID 20110804135505.GA15970@adacore.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Arnaud Charlet Aug. 4, 2011, 1:55 p.m. UTC
Follow-up of implementation of Test_Case pragma/aspect.

Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk

2011-08-04  Yannick Moy  <moy@adacore.com>

	* sem_prag.adb (Check_Arg_Is_String_Literal): remove useless procedure
	(Analyze_Pragma): allow static string expression for name of Test_Case,
	instead of simply string literals.
	* sem_util.adb (Get_Name_From_Test_Case_Pragma): adapt to static string
	expressions.
diff mbox

Patch

Index: sem_prag.adb
===================================================================
--- sem_prag.adb	(revision 177388)
+++ sem_prag.adb	(working copy)
@@ -335,10 +335,6 @@ 
       --  Check the specified argument Arg to make sure that it is an integer
       --  literal. If not give error and raise Pragma_Exit.
 
-      procedure Check_Arg_Is_String_Literal (Arg : Node_Id);
-      --  Check the specified argument Arg to make sure that it is a string
-      --  literal. If not give error and raise Pragma_Exit.
-
       procedure Check_Arg_Is_Library_Level_Local_Name (Arg : Node_Id);
       --  Check the specified argument Arg to make sure that it has the proper
       --  syntactic form for a local name and meets the semantic requirements
@@ -426,9 +422,9 @@ 
       --  Checks that the given argument has an identifier, and if so, requires
       --  it to match one of the given identifier names. If there is no
       --  identifier, or a non-matching identifier, then an error message is
-      --  given and Pragma_Exit is raised. ??? why is this needed, why isnt
-      --  Check_Arg_Is_One_Of good enough. At the very least explain this
-      --  odd apparent redundancy
+      --  given and Pragma_Exit is raised. This checks the optional identifier
+      --  of a pragma argument, not the argument itself like
+      --  Check_Arg_Is_One_Of does.
 
       procedure Check_In_Main_Program;
       --  Common checks for pragmas that appear within a main program
@@ -901,19 +897,6 @@ 
          end if;
       end Check_Arg_Is_Integer_Literal;
 
-      ---------------------------------
-      -- Check_Arg_Is_String_Literal --
-      ---------------------------------
-
-      procedure Check_Arg_Is_String_Literal (Arg : Node_Id) is
-         Argx : constant Node_Id := Get_Pragma_Arg (Arg);
-      begin
-         if Nkind (Argx) /= N_String_Literal then
-            Error_Pragma_Arg
-              ("argument for pragma% must be string literal", Argx);
-         end if;
-      end Check_Arg_Is_String_Literal;
-
       -------------------------------------------
       -- Check_Arg_Is_Library_Level_Local_Name --
       -------------------------------------------
@@ -13264,17 +13247,12 @@ 
          -- Test_Case --
          ---------------
 
-         --  pragma Test_Case ([Name     =>] String_EXPRESSION
+         --  pragma Test_Case ([Name     =>] static_string_EXPRESSION
          --                   ,[Mode     =>] (Normal | Robustness)
          --                  [, Requires =>  Boolean_EXPRESSION]
          --                  [, Ensures  =>  Boolean_EXPRESSION]);
 
-         --  ??? Why is Name not static_string_EXPRESSION??? Seems very
-         --  weird to require it to be a string literal, and if we DO want
-         --  that restriction the grammar should make this clear.
-
          when Pragma_Test_Case => Test_Case : declare
-
          begin
             GNAT_Pragma;
             Check_At_Least_N_Arguments (3);
@@ -13283,7 +13261,7 @@ 
               ((Name_Name, Name_Mode, Name_Requires, Name_Ensures));
 
             Check_Optional_Identifier (Arg1, Name_Name);
-            Check_Arg_Is_String_Literal (Arg1);
+            Check_Arg_Is_Static_Expression (Arg1, Standard_String);
             Check_Optional_Identifier (Arg2, Name_Mode);
             Check_Arg_Is_One_Of (Arg2, Name_Normal, Name_Robustness);
 
@@ -13291,9 +13269,6 @@ 
                Check_Identifier (Arg3, Name_Requires);
                Check_Identifier (Arg4, Name_Ensures);
             else
-               --  ??? why not Check_Arg_Is_One_Of, very odd!!! At the very
-               --  least needs an explanation!
-
                Check_Identifier_Is_One_Of (Arg3, Name_Requires, Name_Ensures);
             end if;
 
Index: sem_util.adb
===================================================================
--- sem_util.adb	(revision 177385)
+++ sem_util.adb	(working copy)
@@ -4336,9 +4336,10 @@ 
    ------------------------------------
 
    function Get_Name_From_Test_Case_Pragma (N : Node_Id) return String_Id is
+      Arg : constant Node_Id :=
+              Get_Pragma_Arg (First (Pragma_Argument_Associations (N)));
    begin
-      return
-        Strval (Get_Pragma_Arg (First (Pragma_Argument_Associations (N))));
+      return Strval (Expr_Value_S (Arg));
    end Get_Name_From_Test_Case_Pragma;
 
    -------------------