From patchwork Thu Feb 14 13:53:56 2013 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Greta Yorsh X-Patchwork-Id: 220447 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4858E2C0085 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:54:28 +1100 (EST) Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; x=1361454868; h=Comment: DomainKey-Signature:Received:Received:Received:Received:Received: From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To; bh=c2915+Ewls2qYhvz9Q4K oYed7n0=; b=cYAlzAamgc33FbSww8bgrP7tJcVzHe3YvKzg9LR4AzK5m3OLnky1 0nnZMk/nOvYp6j6AhUpxBLaxxIL0bFVT5RhVBEINv0OBebwM3F67u/YPlcZxF5Fh QmrXPhiJmGCF31dUwG3am87/GQX+rw9yZQ0r9AUL1oI5JPIXvDfbffA= Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=Received:Received:X-SWARE-Spam-Status:X-Spam-Check-By:Received:Received:Received:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:X-MC-Unique:Content-Type:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To; b=IMxmPEPuXUARlZuo52wRJSIhgQ7jESH2vCNnnmKasylK08cvMj8EV+4dwHAKj/ T19AjGCXfjRLlGbRm/gUG5phxwZJTV+fCpvVFBTQPfEe0EoWs5Jjgo2eHuTXRreK pmaossPkc/KCRzztJUuZAHi1COtqa21+hZ2NapL3fn+6s=; Received: (qmail 23622 invoked by alias); 14 Feb 2013 13:54:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 23609 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Feb 2013 13:54:18 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_50, KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST, KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP, MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from service87.mimecast.com (HELO service87.mimecast.com) (91.220.42.44) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:54:11 +0000 Received: from cam-owa1.Emea.Arm.com (fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com [217.140.96.21]) by service87.mimecast.com; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:54:09 +0000 Received: from e103227vm ([10.1.255.212]) by cam-owa1.Emea.Arm.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:54:08 +0000 From: "Greta Yorsh" To: "GCC Patches" Cc: "Ramana Radhakrishnan" , "Richard Earnshaw" Subject: [PATCH,ARM] Set attribute predicable Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:53:56 -0000 Message-ID: <000d01ce0aba$bb75afd0$32610f70$@yorsh@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MC-Unique: 113021413540909501 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org This patch sets attribute "predicable" to "yes" for patterns that handle add with carry and already use %? in their output statements. Ok for trunk? Thanks, Greta gcc/ 2013-02-14 Greta Yorsh * config/arm/arm.md (addsi3_carryin_): Set attribute "predicable" to yes. (addsi3_carryin_alt2_,addsi3_carryin_shift_): Likewise. diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.md b/gcc/config/arm/arm.md index 1cb1515b1fa57c6052b68eb8701616c1b80e7416..35294dd6560ac63279d95eca6cf774257e06bd93 100644 --- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.md +++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.md @@ -974,7 +974,8 @@ (define_insn "*addsi3_carryin_" "@ adc%?\\t%0, %1, %2 sbc%?\\t%0, %1, #%B2" - [(set_attr "conds" "use")] + [(set_attr "conds" "use") + (set_attr "predicable" "yes")] ) (define_insn "*addsi3_carryin_alt2_" @@ -986,7 +987,8 @@ (define_insn "*addsi3_carryin_alt2_" @@ -1000,6 +1002,7 @@ (define_insn "*addsi3_carryin_shift_