From patchwork Thu Aug 25 11:45:37 2011
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Patchwork-Submitter: Terry Guo <terry.guo@arm.com>
X-Patchwork-Id: 111556
Return-Path: 
 <gcc-patches-return-300564-incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org>
X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org
Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org
Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131])
	by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 892BEB6F70
	for <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>;
	Thu, 25 Aug 2011 21:46:03 +1000 (EST)
Received: (qmail 14028 invoked by alias); 25 Aug 2011 11:46:01 -0000
Received: (qmail 14020 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Aug 2011 11:46:01 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL, BAYES_00,
	MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from service87.mimecast.com (HELO service87.mimecast.com)
	(94.185.240.25) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP;
	Thu, 25 Aug 2011 11:45:47 +0000
Received: from cam-owa1.Emea.Arm.com (fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com
	[217.140.96.21]) by service87.mimecast.com;
	Thu, 25 Aug 2011 12:45:45 +0100
Received: from Terrysh02 ([10.1.255.212]) by cam-owa1.Emea.Arm.com with
	Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Thu, 25 Aug 2011 12:45:43 +0100
From: "Terry Guo" <terry.guo@arm.com>
To: <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: [PATCH,
	testsuite] Avoid architecture options conflict for case pr42894.c
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 19:45:37 +0800
Message-ID: <000c01cc631c$83737dc0$8a5a7940$@guo@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MC-Unique: 111082512454504201
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: 
 <mailto:gcc-patches-unsubscribe-incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org

Hello,

I think it is useful to run this case for newer arm targets. So the patch
intends to skip the warning of architecture conflicts. Is it ok to commit to
trunk?

BR,
Terry

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

2011-08-25  Terry Guo  <terry.guo@arm.com>

        * gcc.dg/tls/pr42894.c: Add dg-prune-output to skip
        architecture conflict.

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tls/pr42894.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tls/pr42894.c
index c3bd76c..cda6719 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tls/pr42894.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tls/pr42894.c
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 /* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-march=armv5te -mthumb" { target arm*-*-* } } */
 /* { dg-require-effective-target tls } */
+/* { dg-prune-output "switch .* conflicts with" } */
 
 extern __thread int t;