diff mbox series

[V2] acpi: method: remove redundant continue statements

Message ID 20210330110100.1061146-1-colin.king@canonical.com
State Accepted
Headers show
Series [V2] acpi: method: remove redundant continue statements | expand

Commit Message

Colin Ian King March 30, 2021, 11:01 a.m. UTC
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

The continue statement at the end of a for-loop is redundant. Remove
it to silence pedantic static analysis warnings.

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---

V2: Fix two more of these issues

---
 src/acpi/method/method.c | 12 +++---------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Comments

Alex Hung March 30, 2021, 9:44 p.m. UTC | #1
On 2021-03-30 5:01 a.m., Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> 
> The continue statement at the end of a for-loop is redundant. Remove
> it to silence pedantic static analysis warnings.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
> 
> V2: Fix two more of these issues
> 
> ---
>  src/acpi/method/method.c | 12 +++---------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/acpi/method/method.c b/src/acpi/method/method.c
> index f5253de9..763c3252 100644
> --- a/src/acpi/method/method.c
> +++ b/src/acpi/method/method.c
> @@ -3620,10 +3620,8 @@ static void method_test_FPS_return(
>  				elements_ok = false;
>  		}
>  
> -		if (!elements_ok) {
> +		if (!elements_ok)
>  			failed = true;
> -			continue;
> -		}
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!failed)
> @@ -3821,10 +3819,8 @@ static void method_test_ART_return(
>  
>  		}
>  
> -		if (!elements_ok) {
> +		if (!elements_ok)
>  			failed = true;
> -			continue;
> -		}
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!failed)
> @@ -3884,10 +3880,8 @@ static void method_test_TRT_return(
>  				elements_ok = false;
>  		}
>  
> -		if (!elements_ok) {
> +		if (!elements_ok)
>  			failed = true;
> -			continue;
> -		}
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!failed)
> 


Acked-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung@canonical.com>
Ivan Hu April 6, 2021, 5:40 a.m. UTC | #2
On 3/30/21 7:01 PM, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> The continue statement at the end of a for-loop is redundant. Remove
> it to silence pedantic static analysis warnings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
>
> V2: Fix two more of these issues
>
> ---
>  src/acpi/method/method.c | 12 +++---------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/acpi/method/method.c b/src/acpi/method/method.c
> index f5253de9..763c3252 100644
> --- a/src/acpi/method/method.c
> +++ b/src/acpi/method/method.c
> @@ -3620,10 +3620,8 @@ static void method_test_FPS_return(
>  				elements_ok = false;
>  		}
>  
> -		if (!elements_ok) {
> +		if (!elements_ok)
>  			failed = true;
> -			continue;
> -		}
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!failed)
> @@ -3821,10 +3819,8 @@ static void method_test_ART_return(
>  
>  		}
>  
> -		if (!elements_ok) {
> +		if (!elements_ok)
>  			failed = true;
> -			continue;
> -		}
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!failed)
> @@ -3884,10 +3880,8 @@ static void method_test_TRT_return(
>  				elements_ok = false;
>  		}
>  
> -		if (!elements_ok) {
> +		if (!elements_ok)
>  			failed = true;
> -			continue;
> -		}
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!failed)


Acked-by: Ivan Hu <ivan.hu@canonical.com>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/src/acpi/method/method.c b/src/acpi/method/method.c
index f5253de9..763c3252 100644
--- a/src/acpi/method/method.c
+++ b/src/acpi/method/method.c
@@ -3620,10 +3620,8 @@  static void method_test_FPS_return(
 				elements_ok = false;
 		}
 
-		if (!elements_ok) {
+		if (!elements_ok)
 			failed = true;
-			continue;
-		}
 	}
 
 	if (!failed)
@@ -3821,10 +3819,8 @@  static void method_test_ART_return(
 
 		}
 
-		if (!elements_ok) {
+		if (!elements_ok)
 			failed = true;
-			continue;
-		}
 	}
 
 	if (!failed)
@@ -3884,10 +3880,8 @@  static void method_test_TRT_return(
 				elements_ok = false;
 		}
 
-		if (!elements_ok) {
+		if (!elements_ok)
 			failed = true;
-			continue;
-		}
 	}
 
 	if (!failed)