Message ID | 20250514-mt6357-regulator-fixed-compatibles-removal-bindings-v1-1-2421e9cc6cc7@collabora.com |
---|---|
State | Handled Elsewhere |
Headers | show |
Series | regulator: dt-bindings: mt6357: Drop fixed compatible requirement | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
robh/checkpatch | success | |
robh/patch-applied | success | |
robh/dt-meta-schema | success |
On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 08:36:06AM -0400, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote: > Some of the regulators on the MT6357 PMIC currently reference the > fixed-regulator dt-binding, which enforces the presence of a > regulator-fixed compatible. However since all regulators on the MT6357 > PMIC are handled by a single mt6357-regulator driver, probed through > MFD, the compatibles don't serve any purpose. In fact they cause > failures in the DT kselftest since they aren't probed by the fixed > regulator driver as would be expected. Furthermore this is the only > dt-binding in this family like this: mt6359-regulator and > mt6358-regulator don't require those compatibles. > > Commit d77e89b7b03f ("arm64: dts: mediatek: mt6357: Drop regulator-fixed > compatibles") removed the compatibles from Devicetree, but missed > updating the binding, which still requires them, introducing dt-binding > errors. Remove the compatible requirement by referencing the plain > regulator dt-binding instead to fix the dt-binding errors. > > Fixes: d77e89b7b03f ("arm64: dts: mediatek: mt6357: Drop regulator-fixed compatibles") > Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com> Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
On Wed, 14 May 2025 08:36:06 -0400, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote: > Some of the regulators on the MT6357 PMIC currently reference the > fixed-regulator dt-binding, which enforces the presence of a > regulator-fixed compatible. However since all regulators on the MT6357 > PMIC are handled by a single mt6357-regulator driver, probed through > MFD, the compatibles don't serve any purpose. In fact they cause > failures in the DT kselftest since they aren't probed by the fixed > regulator driver as would be expected. Furthermore this is the only > dt-binding in this family like this: mt6359-regulator and > mt6358-regulator don't require those compatibles. > > [...] Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next Thanks! [1/1] regulator: dt-bindings: mt6357: Drop fixed compatible requirement commit: 9cfdd7752ba5f8cc9b8191e8c9aeeec246241fa4 All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/mediatek,mt6357-regulator.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/mediatek,mt6357-regulator.yaml index 6327bb2f6ee080a178ff3e982768c5eb0595e771..698266c09e25359a516d969a0487cc94444b842d 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/mediatek,mt6357-regulator.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/mediatek,mt6357-regulator.yaml @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ patternProperties: "^ldo-v(camio18|aud28|aux18|io18|io28|rf12|rf18|cn18|cn28|fe28)$": type: object - $ref: fixed-regulator.yaml# + $ref: regulator.yaml# unevaluatedProperties: false description: Properties for single fixed LDO regulator. @@ -112,7 +112,6 @@ examples: regulator-enable-ramp-delay = <220>; }; mt6357_vfe28_reg: ldo-vfe28 { - compatible = "regulator-fixed"; regulator-name = "vfe28"; regulator-min-microvolt = <2800000>; regulator-max-microvolt = <2800000>; @@ -125,14 +124,12 @@ examples: regulator-enable-ramp-delay = <110>; }; mt6357_vrf18_reg: ldo-vrf18 { - compatible = "regulator-fixed"; regulator-name = "vrf18"; regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>; regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>; regulator-enable-ramp-delay = <110>; }; mt6357_vrf12_reg: ldo-vrf12 { - compatible = "regulator-fixed"; regulator-name = "vrf12"; regulator-min-microvolt = <1200000>; regulator-max-microvolt = <1200000>; @@ -157,14 +154,12 @@ examples: regulator-enable-ramp-delay = <264>; }; mt6357_vcn28_reg: ldo-vcn28 { - compatible = "regulator-fixed"; regulator-name = "vcn28"; regulator-min-microvolt = <2800000>; regulator-max-microvolt = <2800000>; regulator-enable-ramp-delay = <264>; }; mt6357_vcn18_reg: ldo-vcn18 { - compatible = "regulator-fixed"; regulator-name = "vcn18"; regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>; regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>; @@ -183,7 +178,6 @@ examples: regulator-enable-ramp-delay = <264>; }; mt6357_vcamio_reg: ldo-vcamio18 { - compatible = "regulator-fixed"; regulator-name = "vcamio"; regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>; regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>; @@ -212,28 +206,24 @@ examples: regulator-always-on; }; mt6357_vaux18_reg: ldo-vaux18 { - compatible = "regulator-fixed"; regulator-name = "vaux18"; regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>; regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>; regulator-enable-ramp-delay = <264>; }; mt6357_vaud28_reg: ldo-vaud28 { - compatible = "regulator-fixed"; regulator-name = "vaud28"; regulator-min-microvolt = <2800000>; regulator-max-microvolt = <2800000>; regulator-enable-ramp-delay = <264>; }; mt6357_vio28_reg: ldo-vio28 { - compatible = "regulator-fixed"; regulator-name = "vio28"; regulator-min-microvolt = <2800000>; regulator-max-microvolt = <2800000>; regulator-enable-ramp-delay = <264>; }; mt6357_vio18_reg: ldo-vio18 { - compatible = "regulator-fixed"; regulator-name = "vio18"; regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>; regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
Some of the regulators on the MT6357 PMIC currently reference the fixed-regulator dt-binding, which enforces the presence of a regulator-fixed compatible. However since all regulators on the MT6357 PMIC are handled by a single mt6357-regulator driver, probed through MFD, the compatibles don't serve any purpose. In fact they cause failures in the DT kselftest since they aren't probed by the fixed regulator driver as would be expected. Furthermore this is the only dt-binding in this family like this: mt6359-regulator and mt6358-regulator don't require those compatibles. Commit d77e89b7b03f ("arm64: dts: mediatek: mt6357: Drop regulator-fixed compatibles") removed the compatibles from Devicetree, but missed updating the binding, which still requires them, introducing dt-binding errors. Remove the compatible requirement by referencing the plain regulator dt-binding instead to fix the dt-binding errors. Fixes: d77e89b7b03f ("arm64: dts: mediatek: mt6357: Drop regulator-fixed compatibles") Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com> --- .../bindings/regulator/mediatek,mt6357-regulator.yaml | 12 +----------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-) --- base-commit: edef457004774e598fc4c1b7d1d4f0bcd9d0bb30 change-id: 20250513-mt6357-regulator-fixed-compatibles-removal-bindings-5e61fa4e5847 Best regards,