diff mbox series

dt-bindings: remoteproc: mtk,scp: Add missing additionalProperties on child node schemas

Message ID 20230926164513.101958-1-robh@kernel.org
State Superseded
Headers show
Series dt-bindings: remoteproc: mtk,scp: Add missing additionalProperties on child node schemas | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
robh/checkpatch success
robh/patch-applied success
robh/dtbs-check warning build log
robh/dt-meta-schema success

Commit Message

Rob Herring (Arm) Sept. 26, 2023, 4:45 p.m. UTC
Just as unevaluatedProperties or additionalProperties are required at
the top level of schemas, they should (and will) also be required for
child node schemas. That ensures only documented properties are
present for any node.

Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Comments

AngeloGioacchino Del Regno Sept. 27, 2023, 12:25 p.m. UTC | #1
Il 26/09/23 18:45, Rob Herring ha scritto:
> Just as unevaluatedProperties or additionalProperties are required at
> the top level of schemas, they should (and will) also be required for
> child node schemas. That ensures only documented properties are
> present for any node.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Conor Dooley Sept. 27, 2023, 3:12 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 11:45:08AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Just as unevaluatedProperties or additionalProperties are required at
> the top level of schemas, they should (and will) also be required for
> child node schemas. That ensures only documented properties are
> present for any node.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> ---

Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>


>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml
> index 895415772d1d..24422fd56e83 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml
> @@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ allOf:
>  
>  additionalProperties:
>    type: object
> +  additionalProperties: false
>    description:
>      Subnodes of the SCP represent rpmsg devices. The names of the devices
>      are not important. The properties of these nodes are defined by the
> -- 
> 2.40.1
>
Mathieu Poirier Sept. 28, 2023, 7:31 p.m. UTC | #3
Hi Rob,

On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 11:45:08AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Just as unevaluatedProperties or additionalProperties are required at
> the top level of schemas, they should (and will) also be required for
> child node schemas. That ensures only documented properties are
> present for any node.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml
> index 895415772d1d..24422fd56e83 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml
> @@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ allOf:
>  
>  additionalProperties:
>    type: object
> +  additionalProperties: false

Things have changed in the remoteproc tree [1] and this patch doesn't apply.
Please see if it is still needed.

Thanks,
Mathieu

[1]. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/remoteproc/linux.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml?h=rproc-next#n80

>    description:
>      Subnodes of the SCP represent rpmsg devices. The names of the devices
>      are not important. The properties of these nodes are defined by the
> -- 
> 2.40.1
>
Rob Herring (Arm) Sept. 28, 2023, 8:51 p.m. UTC | #4
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 2:31 PM Mathieu Poirier
<mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 11:45:08AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > Just as unevaluatedProperties or additionalProperties are required at
> > the top level of schemas, they should (and will) also be required for
> > child node schemas. That ensures only documented properties are
> > present for any node.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml
> > index 895415772d1d..24422fd56e83 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml
> > @@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ allOf:
> >
> >  additionalProperties:
> >    type: object
> > +  additionalProperties: false
>
> Things have changed in the remoteproc tree [1] and this patch doesn't apply.
> Please see if it is still needed.

It is not needed any more.

Thanks,
Rob
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml
index 895415772d1d..24422fd56e83 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.yaml
@@ -91,6 +91,7 @@  allOf:
 
 additionalProperties:
   type: object
+  additionalProperties: false
   description:
     Subnodes of the SCP represent rpmsg devices. The names of the devices
     are not important. The properties of these nodes are defined by the