diff mbox series

[3/3] dt-bindings: iio: adc: add lltc,ltc2309 bindings

Message ID 20230824-ltc2309-v1-3-b87b4eb8030c@gmail.com
State Superseded, archived
Headers show
Series iio: adc: add LTC2309 support | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
robh/checkpatch warning total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 52 lines checked
robh/patch-applied success
robh/dtbs-check warning build log
robh/dt-meta-schema success

Commit Message

Liam Beguin Aug. 24, 2023, 4:55 p.m. UTC
Add devicetree bindings for the Linear Technology LTC2309 ADC driver.

Signed-off-by: Liam Beguin <liambeguin@gmail.com>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/lltc,ltc2309.yaml  | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)

Comments

Krzysztof Kozlowski Aug. 24, 2023, 5:56 p.m. UTC | #1
On 24/08/2023 18:55, Liam Beguin wrote:
> Add devicetree bindings for the Linear Technology LTC2309 ADC driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Liam Beguin <liambeguin@gmail.com>

Thank you for your patch. There is something to discuss/improve.


> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/lltc,ltc2309.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0

Wrong license. Run checkpatch before sending patches.

> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/iio/adc/lltc,ltc2309.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Linear Technology / Analog Devices LTC2309 ADC
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Liam Beguin <liambeguin@gmail.com>
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    enum:
> +      - lltc,ltc2309
> +
> +  refcomp-supply:
> +    description: Power supply for the reference voltage

refcomp is not a supply. It is called "Reference Buffer Output.". You
probably wanted vref-supply, which suggests you should just add it to
ltc2497 bindings. I don't see any differences.

> +
> +  reg:
> +    enum:
> +      - 0x08
> +      - 0x09
> +      - 0x0a
> +      - 0x0b
> +      - 0x18
> +      - 0x19
> +      - 0x1a
> +      - 0x1b
> +      - 0x28
> +
> +  "#io-channel-cells":
> +    const: 1
> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - reg
> +
> +unevaluatedProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    i2c {
> +        #address-cells = <1>;
> +        #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> +        adc@28 {
> +            #io-channel-cells = <1>;
> +            compatible = "lltc,ltc2309";
> +            reg = <0x28>;

If the example stays, then order is compatible first, then reg, then the
rest. Also add the supply to make example complete.

But I think this should be squashed with other binding so no need for
the example.

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Liam Beguin Aug. 24, 2023, 6:50 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 07:56:29PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 24/08/2023 18:55, Liam Beguin wrote:
> > Add devicetree bindings for the Linear Technology LTC2309 ADC driver.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Liam Beguin <liambeguin@gmail.com>
> 
> Thank you for your patch. There is something to discuss/improve.
> 
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/lltc,ltc2309.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> 
> Wrong license. Run checkpatch before sending patches.
> 

Sorry about that, I ran it through checkpatch but it didn't flag
anything.

> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/iio/adc/lltc,ltc2309.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: Linear Technology / Analog Devices LTC2309 ADC
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > +  - Liam Beguin <liambeguin@gmail.com>
> > +
> > +properties:
> > +  compatible:
> > +    enum:
> > +      - lltc,ltc2309
> > +
> > +  refcomp-supply:
> > +    description: Power supply for the reference voltage
> 
> refcomp is not a supply. It is called "Reference Buffer Output.". You

That makes sense, I was going for the PIN name from the datasheet.

> probably wanted vref-supply, which suggests you should just add it to
> ltc2497 bindings. I don't see any differences.
> 

I hadn't thought of reusing an existing bindings file for a different
driver. I'll update ltc2497.yaml instead since it avoids duplicating the
whole file.

> > +
> > +  reg:
> > +    enum:
> > +      - 0x08
> > +      - 0x09
> > +      - 0x0a
> > +      - 0x0b
> > +      - 0x18
> > +      - 0x19
> > +      - 0x1a
> > +      - 0x1b
> > +      - 0x28
> > +
> > +  "#io-channel-cells":
> > +    const: 1
> > +
> > +required:
> > +  - compatible
> > +  - reg
> > +
> > +unevaluatedProperties: false
> > +
> > +examples:
> > +  - |
> > +    i2c {
> > +        #address-cells = <1>;
> > +        #size-cells = <0>;
> > +
> > +        adc@28 {
> > +            #io-channel-cells = <1>;
> > +            compatible = "lltc,ltc2309";
> > +            reg = <0x28>;
> 
> If the example stays, then order is compatible first, then reg, then the
> rest. Also add the supply to make example complete.

Thanks for pointing out the proper order.

> But I think this should be squashed with other binding so no need for
> the example.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 

Thanks for your time!
Liam
Krzysztof Kozlowski Aug. 25, 2023, 6:15 a.m. UTC | #3
On 24/08/2023 20:50, Liam Beguin wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 07:56:29PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 24/08/2023 18:55, Liam Beguin wrote:
>>> Add devicetree bindings for the Linear Technology LTC2309 ADC driver.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Liam Beguin <liambeguin@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for your patch. There is something to discuss/improve.
>>
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/lltc,ltc2309.yaml
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>
>> Wrong license. Run checkpatch before sending patches.
>>
> 
> Sorry about that, I ran it through checkpatch but it didn't flag
> anything.

No, you didn't, because checkpatch flags it easily:

WARNING: DT binding documents should be licensed (GPL-2.0-only OR
BSD-2-Clause)
#21: FILE: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/lltc,ltc2309.yaml:1:
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0

total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 52 lines checked


Best regards,
Krzysztof
Liam Beguin Aug. 25, 2023, 3:53 p.m. UTC | #4
Hi Krzysztof,

On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 08:15:57AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 24/08/2023 20:50, Liam Beguin wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 07:56:29PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 24/08/2023 18:55, Liam Beguin wrote:
> >>> Add devicetree bindings for the Linear Technology LTC2309 ADC driver.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Liam Beguin <liambeguin@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> Thank you for your patch. There is something to discuss/improve.
> >>
> >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/lltc,ltc2309.yaml
> >>> @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
> >>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >>
> >> Wrong license. Run checkpatch before sending patches.
> >>
> > 
> > Sorry about that, I ran it through checkpatch but it didn't flag
> > anything.
> 
> No, you didn't, because checkpatch flags it easily:
> 
> WARNING: DT binding documents should be licensed (GPL-2.0-only OR
> BSD-2-Clause)
> #21: FILE: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/lltc,ltc2309.yaml:1:
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> 
> total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 52 lines checked

It seems like I wasn't running checkpatch in strict mode.
Thanks for pointing that out.

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Cheers,
Liam
Krzysztof Kozlowski Aug. 26, 2023, 8:36 a.m. UTC | #5
On 25/08/2023 17:53, Liam Beguin wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 08:15:57AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 24/08/2023 20:50, Liam Beguin wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 07:56:29PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 24/08/2023 18:55, Liam Beguin wrote:
>>>>> Add devicetree bindings for the Linear Technology LTC2309 ADC driver.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Liam Beguin <liambeguin@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your patch. There is something to discuss/improve.
>>>>
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/lltc,ltc2309.yaml
>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
>>>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>>>
>>>> Wrong license. Run checkpatch before sending patches.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry about that, I ran it through checkpatch but it didn't flag
>>> anything.
>>
>> No, you didn't, because checkpatch flags it easily:
>>
>> WARNING: DT binding documents should be licensed (GPL-2.0-only OR
>> BSD-2-Clause)
>> #21: FILE: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/lltc,ltc2309.yaml:1:
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>
>> total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 52 lines checked
> 
> It seems like I wasn't running checkpatch in strict mode.

No. This was not a strict mode but a regular run. I don't understand why
you are turning this all the time around... You can easily check by
yourself and reproduce the warning any time.


Best regards,
Krzysztof
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/lltc,ltc2309.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/lltc,ltc2309.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..7874290dad75
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/lltc,ltc2309.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ 
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/iio/adc/lltc,ltc2309.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Linear Technology / Analog Devices LTC2309 ADC
+
+maintainers:
+  - Liam Beguin <liambeguin@gmail.com>
+
+properties:
+  compatible:
+    enum:
+      - lltc,ltc2309
+
+  refcomp-supply:
+    description: Power supply for the reference voltage
+
+  reg:
+    enum:
+      - 0x08
+      - 0x09
+      - 0x0a
+      - 0x0b
+      - 0x18
+      - 0x19
+      - 0x1a
+      - 0x1b
+      - 0x28
+
+  "#io-channel-cells":
+    const: 1
+
+required:
+  - compatible
+  - reg
+
+unevaluatedProperties: false
+
+examples:
+  - |
+    i2c {
+        #address-cells = <1>;
+        #size-cells = <0>;
+
+        adc@28 {
+            #io-channel-cells = <1>;
+            compatible = "lltc,ltc2309";
+            reg = <0x28>;
+        };
+    };