diff mbox series

[3/3] dt-bindings: phy: add definition for MSM8960

Message ID 20220728111740.30595-1-peremen@gmail.com
State Changes Requested, archived
Headers show
Series None | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
robh/checkpatch success
robh/patch-applied success
robh/dtbs-check warning build log
robh/dt-meta-schema success

Commit Message

Shinjo Park July 28, 2022, 11:17 a.m. UTC
Document the changes introduced by MSM8960 inclusion.

Signed-off-by: Shinjo Park <peremen@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,usb-hs-phy.yaml | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Comments

Krzysztof Kozlowski July 28, 2022, 11:47 a.m. UTC | #1
On 28/07/2022 13:17, Shinjo Park wrote:
> Document the changes introduced by MSM8960 inclusion.
> 

1. Thread your submissions.
2. Use subject prefix matching the file.

> Signed-off-by: Shinjo Park <peremen@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>

It is a v1. How the review tag got here?

Best regards,
Krzysztof
David Heidelberg July 28, 2022, 11:54 a.m. UTC | #2
On 28/07/2022 13:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 28/07/2022 13:17, Shinjo Park wrote:
>> Document the changes introduced by MSM8960 inclusion.
>>
> 1. Thread your submissions.
> 2. Use subject prefix matching the file.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Shinjo Park <peremen@gmail.com>
>> Reviewed-by: David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>
> It is a v1. How the review tag got here?

We have a Matrix channel ( #linux-apq8064:matrix.org and downstream fork 
for apq8064/msm8960 [1]), so I saw the patch before it was send to ML.

David

[1] https://github.com/apq8064-mainline/linux

>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Krzysztof Kozlowski July 28, 2022, 12:03 p.m. UTC | #3
On 28/07/2022 13:54, David Heidelberg wrote:
> On 28/07/2022 13:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 28/07/2022 13:17, Shinjo Park wrote:
>>> Document the changes introduced by MSM8960 inclusion.
>>>
>> 1. Thread your submissions.
>> 2. Use subject prefix matching the file.
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Shinjo Park <peremen@gmail.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>
>> It is a v1. How the review tag got here?
> 
> We have a Matrix channel ( #linux-apq8064:matrix.org and downstream fork 
> for apq8064/msm8960 [1]), so I saw the patch before it was send to ML.
> 
> David

New submitters and beginners should rather use full-mailing list
process. Since there is quite a chance of beginner mistakes (which was
seen here), they might misunderstand something and add Reviewed-by tag
even if not received it with respective "Reviewer's statement of oversight".

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Krzysztof Kozlowski July 28, 2022, 2:10 p.m. UTC | #4
On 28/07/2022 15:54, Shinjo Park wrote:
> Hello Krzysztof,
> 
> Sorry for any confusion during my first patch submission.
> 
> PATCH 1:
>>> Change the reference of sleep_clk to the same as qcom-apq8064.dtsi.
>>
>> You add label, not change something.
> 
>>> - sleep_clk {
> 
>>> + sleep_clk: sleep_clk {
> 
>>
> 
>> Since you touch the line, make the device node sleep-clk (device node
> 
>> names should not have underscores) and mention this in commit msg.
> 
> 
> I can change the line into "sleep_clk: sleep-clk". And the commit message
> would be "Change the device node of sleep_clk to sleep-clk and add a
> label"? Another problem is that in the same .dtsi file there are other
> device nodes containing underscores (cxo_board, pxo_board). Should I also
> change these in the patch?
> 
> PATCH 2:
>>> +                     phy-names = "usb-phy";
>>> +                     status = "disabled";
>>
>> status is the last property.
>>
>>> +                     #reset-cells = <1>;
> 
> I can move #reset-cells one line up and make the status last line. On the
> other hand, the same definition is also used in
> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi (also the clock definition mentioned in
> PATCH 1). Shall I include another patch for that file in the next revision
> of this patch series?


Yes, you can rename them in other patch as well.

> 
> PATH 3:
>> 1. Thread your submissions.
> 
> Shall I use this thread for all follow-ups for my first and second patch?

No. One patchset, one thread.

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.19-rc5/source/Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst

> 
>> 2. Use subject prefix matching the file.
> 
> If I understood correctly, then this should be "dt-bindings: phy:
> qcom,usb-hs-phy:"?

Yes.


Best regards,
Krzysztof
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,usb-hs-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,usb-hs-phy.yaml
index 0655e485b..b3075c5ab 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,usb-hs-phy.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,usb-hs-phy.yaml
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@  properties:
           - qcom,usb-hs-phy-apq8064
           - qcom,usb-hs-phy-msm8226
           - qcom,usb-hs-phy-msm8916
+          - qcom,usb-hs-phy-msm8960
           - qcom,usb-hs-phy-msm8974
       - const: qcom,usb-hs-phy