| Message ID | 20210721140424.725744-11-maxime@cerno.tech |
|---|---|
| State | Changes Requested, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | ARM: dts: Last round of DT schema fixes | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| robh/checkpatch | success | |
| robh/dt-meta-schema | fail | build log |
| robh/checkpatch | success | |
| robh/dt-meta-schema | fail | build log |
| robh/checkpatch | success | |
| robh/dt-meta-schema | fail | build log |
| robh/checkpatch | success | |
| robh/dt-meta-schema | fail | build log |
| robh/checkpatch | success | |
| robh/dt-meta-schema | fail | build log |
On Wed, 21 Jul 2021 16:03:40 +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > The binding mentions that all the drivers using that driver must use a > vendor-specific compatible but never enforces it, nor documents the > vendor-specific compatibles. > > Let's make we document all of them, and that the binding will create an > error if we add one that isn't. > > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> > Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> > Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech> > --- > .../bindings/display/panel/lvds.yaml | 18 ++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check' on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13): yamllint warnings/errors: dtschema/dtc warnings/errors: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/sharp,lq150x1lg11.example.dt.yaml: panel: compatible: ['sharp,lq150x1lg11'] is too short From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/lvds.yaml /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/sharp,lq150x1lg11.example.dt.yaml: panel: 'data-mapping' is a required property From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/lvds.yaml /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/sharp,lq150x1lg11.example.dt.yaml: panel: 'width-mm' is a required property From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/lvds.yaml /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/sharp,lq150x1lg11.example.dt.yaml: panel: 'height-mm' is a required property From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/lvds.yaml /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/sharp,lq150x1lg11.example.dt.yaml: panel: 'panel-timing' is a required property From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/lvds.yaml /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/sharp,lq150x1lg11.example.dt.yaml: panel: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed: 'port' is a required property 'ports' is a required property From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/lvds.yaml \ndoc reference errors (make refcheckdocs): See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1508254 This check can fail if there are any dependencies. The base for a patch series is generally the most recent rc1. If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to date: pip3 install dtschema --upgrade Please check and re-submit.
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 04:03:40PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > The binding mentions that all the drivers using that driver must use a > vendor-specific compatible but never enforces it, nor documents the > vendor-specific compatibles. > > Let's make we document all of them, and that the binding will create an > error if we add one that isn't. > > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> > Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> > Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech> > --- > .../bindings/display/panel/lvds.yaml | 18 ++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/lvds.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/lvds.yaml > index 49460c9dceea..d1513111eb48 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/lvds.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/lvds.yaml > @@ -31,12 +31,18 @@ allOf: > > properties: > compatible: > - contains: > - const: panel-lvds > - description: > - Shall contain "panel-lvds" in addition to a mandatory panel-specific > - compatible string defined in individual panel bindings. The "panel-lvds" > - value shall never be used on its own. > + items: > + - enum: > + - advantech,idk-1110wr At least this one is documented elsewhere. You can add 'minItems: 2' if you want to just enforce having 2 compatibles. Or do: items: - {} - const: panel-lvds Which also enforces the order. > + - advantech,idk-2121wr > + - auo,b101ew05 > + - innolux,ee101ia-01d > + - mitsubishi,aa104xd12 > + - mitsubishi,aa121td01 > + - sgd,gktw70sdae4se > + - sharp,lq150x1lg11 > + - tbs,a711-panel > + - const: panel-lvds > > data-mapping: > enum: > -- > 2.31.1 > >
Hi Rob, Sam, On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 08:29:47PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 04:03:40PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > The binding mentions that all the drivers using that driver must use a > > vendor-specific compatible but never enforces it, nor documents the > > vendor-specific compatibles. > > > > Let's make we document all of them, and that the binding will create an > > error if we add one that isn't. > > > > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > > Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> > > Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> > > Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech> > > --- > > .../bindings/display/panel/lvds.yaml | 18 ++++++++++++------ > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/lvds.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/lvds.yaml > > index 49460c9dceea..d1513111eb48 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/lvds.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/lvds.yaml > > @@ -31,12 +31,18 @@ allOf: > > > > properties: > > compatible: > > - contains: > > - const: panel-lvds > > - description: > > - Shall contain "panel-lvds" in addition to a mandatory panel-specific > > - compatible string defined in individual panel bindings. The "panel-lvds" > > - value shall never be used on its own. > > + items: > > + - enum: > > + - advantech,idk-1110wr > > At least this one is documented elsewhere. Indeed, I missed it. > You can add 'minItems: 2' if you want to just enforce having 2 compatibles. Or do: > > items: > - {} > - const: panel-lvds > > Which also enforces the order. It's not just about the order since a missing compatible will also raise a warning. Some of those panels have a binding of their own, but some probably won't (and I can't find anything specific about the one I'm most interested in: tbs,a711-panel) Can we have something like: compatible: oneOf: - items: - enum: - tbs,a711-panel - const: panel-lvds - items: - {} - const: panel-lvds That would work for both cases I guess? Maxime
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 7:43 AM Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech> wrote: > > Hi Rob, Sam, > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 08:29:47PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 04:03:40PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > The binding mentions that all the drivers using that driver must use a > > > vendor-specific compatible but never enforces it, nor documents the > > > vendor-specific compatibles. > > > > > > Let's make we document all of them, and that the binding will create an > > > error if we add one that isn't. > > > > > > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > > > Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> > > > Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> > > > Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech> > > > --- > > > .../bindings/display/panel/lvds.yaml | 18 ++++++++++++------ > > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/lvds.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/lvds.yaml > > > index 49460c9dceea..d1513111eb48 100644 > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/lvds.yaml > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/lvds.yaml > > > @@ -31,12 +31,18 @@ allOf: > > > > > > properties: > > > compatible: > > > - contains: > > > - const: panel-lvds > > > - description: > > > - Shall contain "panel-lvds" in addition to a mandatory panel-specific > > > - compatible string defined in individual panel bindings. The "panel-lvds" > > > - value shall never be used on its own. > > > + items: > > > + - enum: > > > + - advantech,idk-1110wr > > > > At least this one is documented elsewhere. > > Indeed, I missed it. > > > You can add 'minItems: 2' if you want to just enforce having 2 compatibles. Or do: > > > > items: > > - {} > > - const: panel-lvds > > > > Which also enforces the order. > > It's not just about the order since a missing compatible will also raise > a warning. > > Some of those panels have a binding of their own, but some probably > won't (and I can't find anything specific about the one I'm most > interested in: tbs,a711-panel) > > Can we have something like: > > compatible: > oneOf: > - items: > - enum: > - tbs,a711-panel > - const: panel-lvds > > - items: > - {} > - const: panel-lvds > > That would work for both cases I guess? No, both conditions will be true. If you use 'anyOf', then we're never really checking the specific compatible. I think the problem here is trying to mix a common binding (aka an incomplete collection of properties) and a specific binding. The former is characterized with 'additionalProperties: true' as we have here. You need to create a 'panel-simple-lvds.yaml' schema file that references this one, defines all the 'simple' compatibles, and sets 'unevaluatedProperties: false'. Rob
Hi, On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 08:48:46AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 7:43 AM Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech> wrote: > > > > Hi Rob, Sam, > > > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 08:29:47PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 04:03:40PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > > The binding mentions that all the drivers using that driver must use a > > > > vendor-specific compatible but never enforces it, nor documents the > > > > vendor-specific compatibles. > > > > > > > > Let's make we document all of them, and that the binding will create an > > > > error if we add one that isn't. > > > > > > > > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > > > > Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> > > > > Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> > > > > Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> > > > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech> > > > > --- > > > > .../bindings/display/panel/lvds.yaml | 18 ++++++++++++------ > > > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/lvds.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/lvds.yaml > > > > index 49460c9dceea..d1513111eb48 100644 > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/lvds.yaml > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/lvds.yaml > > > > @@ -31,12 +31,18 @@ allOf: > > > > > > > > properties: > > > > compatible: > > > > - contains: > > > > - const: panel-lvds > > > > - description: > > > > - Shall contain "panel-lvds" in addition to a mandatory panel-specific > > > > - compatible string defined in individual panel bindings. The "panel-lvds" > > > > - value shall never be used on its own. > > > > + items: > > > > + - enum: > > > > + - advantech,idk-1110wr > > > > > > At least this one is documented elsewhere. > > > > Indeed, I missed it. > > > > > You can add 'minItems: 2' if you want to just enforce having 2 compatibles. Or do: > > > > > > items: > > > - {} > > > - const: panel-lvds > > > > > > Which also enforces the order. > > > > It's not just about the order since a missing compatible will also raise > > a warning. > > > > Some of those panels have a binding of their own, but some probably > > won't (and I can't find anything specific about the one I'm most > > interested in: tbs,a711-panel) > > > > Can we have something like: > > > > compatible: > > oneOf: > > - items: > > - enum: > > - tbs,a711-panel > > - const: panel-lvds > > > > - items: > > - {} > > - const: panel-lvds > > > > That would work for both cases I guess? > > No, both conditions will be true. If you use 'anyOf', then we're never > really checking the specific compatible. > > I think the problem here is trying to mix a common binding (aka an > incomplete collection of properties) and a specific binding. I'm not entirely sure why we have specific bindings for this in the first place. We currently have 6 specific bindings, and for 5 of them the only specific thing in there are the data-mapping value to force and their dimension. I'd argue that the dimension shouldn't even be set in stone: you could very well imagine a screen with exactly the same timings but a different size. We would consider it compatible. And the data-mapping can be dealt with with an if clause fairly easily. And for the last one, the specific thing about it is that it's using a dual-link output, which is a generic binding and could thus be described in panel-lvds too. Maxime
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/lvds.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/lvds.yaml index 49460c9dceea..d1513111eb48 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/lvds.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/lvds.yaml @@ -31,12 +31,18 @@ allOf: properties: compatible: - contains: - const: panel-lvds - description: - Shall contain "panel-lvds" in addition to a mandatory panel-specific - compatible string defined in individual panel bindings. The "panel-lvds" - value shall never be used on its own. + items: + - enum: + - advantech,idk-1110wr + - advantech,idk-2121wr + - auo,b101ew05 + - innolux,ee101ia-01d + - mitsubishi,aa104xd12 + - mitsubishi,aa121td01 + - sgd,gktw70sdae4se + - sharp,lq150x1lg11 + - tbs,a711-panel + - const: panel-lvds data-mapping: enum:
The binding mentions that all the drivers using that driver must use a vendor-specific compatible but never enforces it, nor documents the vendor-specific compatibles. Let's make we document all of them, and that the binding will create an error if we add one that isn't. Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech> --- .../bindings/display/panel/lvds.yaml | 18 ++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)