mbox series

[00/13] mailbox/arm64/ qcom: rework compatibles for fallback

Message ID 20230202161856.385825-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org
Headers show
Series mailbox/arm64/ qcom: rework compatibles for fallback | expand

Message

Krzysztof Kozlowski Feb. 2, 2023, 4:18 p.m. UTC 
Hi,

If entire approach is accepted (and correct), there are no dependencies and
patches can be picked independently.  Although the best in the same cycle, so
there will be no new `dtbs_check` warnings.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Krzysztof Kozlowski (13):
  dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom,apcs-kpss-global: use fallbacks
  dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom,apcs-kpss-global: document missing sdx55
  mailbox: qcom-apcs-ipc: do not grow the of_device_id
  arm64: dts: qcom: ipq8074: add compatible fallback to mailbox
  arm64: dts: qcom: msm8976: add compatible fallback to mailbox
  arm64: dts: qcom: msm8994: add compatible fallback to mailbox
  arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998: add compatible fallback to mailbox
  arm64: dts: qcom: sdm630: add compatible fallback to mailbox
  arm64: dts: qcom: sm6115: add compatible fallback to mailbox
  arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: add compatible fallback to mailbox
  arm64: dts: qcom: qcs404: add compatible fallback to mailbox
  arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: add compatible fallback to mailbox
  arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: add compatible fallback to mailbox

 .../mailbox/qcom,apcs-kpss-global.yaml        | 67 +++++++++++--------
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq8074.dtsi         |  3 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8976.dtsi         |  3 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8994.dtsi         |  3 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi         |  3 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs404.dtsi          |  3 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi          |  3 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi          |  3 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115.dtsi          |  3 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi          |  3 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi          |  3 +-
 drivers/mailbox/qcom-apcs-ipc-mailbox.c       | 11 +--
 12 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)

Comments

Krzysztof Kozlowski Feb. 2, 2023, 4:33 p.m. UTC | #1 
On 02/02/2023 17:18, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> If entire approach is accepted (and correct), there are no dependencies and
> patches can be picked independently.  Although the best in the same cycle, so
> there will be no new `dtbs_check` warnings.
> 

This patchset will conflict with:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230126230319.3977109-2-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org/

In few places it actually re-does Dmitry's patch, so probably we should
both come with unified solution.

Best regards,
Krzysztof