Message ID | 20220815005553.1450359-1-colin.foster@in-advantage.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | add support for VSC7512 control over SPI | expand |
Add Lee - My apologies, it seems like you got a new email address and I didn't copy it on this series. On Sun, Aug 14, 2022 at 05:55:53PM -0700, Colin Foster wrote: > The VSC7512 is a networking chip that contains several peripherals. Many of > these peripherals are currently supported by the VSC7513 and VSC7514 chips, > but those run on an internal CPU. The VSC7512 lacks this CPU, and must be > controlled externally. > > Utilize the existing drivers by referencing the chip as an MFD. Add support > for the two MDIO buses, the internal phys, pinctrl, and serial GPIO. > > Signed-off-by: Colin Foster <colin.foster@in-advantage.com> > Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> > --- > > v16 > * Includes fixups: > * ocelot-core.c add includes device.h, export.h, iopoll.h, ioport,h > * ocelot-spi.c add includes device.h, err.h, errno.h, export.h, > mod_devicetable.h, types.h > * Move kconfig.h from ocelot-spi.c to ocelot.h > * Remove unnecessary byteorder.h Something is going on that I don't fully understand with <asm/byteorder.h>. I don't quite see how ocelot-core is throwing all sorts of errors in x86 builds now: https://patchwork.hopto.org/static/nipa/667471/12942993/build_allmodconfig_warn/stderr Snippet from there: /home/nipa/nipa/tests/patch/build_32bit/build_32bit.sh: line 21: ccache gcc: command not found ../drivers/mfd/ocelot-spi.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/bitops.h, ../include/linux/kernel.h, ../arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h, ../arch/x86/include/asm/current.h, ../include/linux/sched.h, ...): ../arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:66:1: warning: unreplaced symbol 'return' ../drivers/mfd/ocelot-spi.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/bitops.h, ../include/linux/kernel.h, ../arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h, ../arch/x86/include/asm/current.h, ../include/linux/sched.h, ...): ../include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h:29:9: warning: unreplaced symbol 'mask' ../include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h:30:9: warning: unreplaced symbol 'p' ../include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h:32:10: warning: unreplaced symbol 'p' ../include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h:32:16: warning: unreplaced symbol 'mask' ../include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h:27:1: warning: unreplaced symbol 'return' ../drivers/mfd/ocelot-spi.c: note: in included file (through ../arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h, ../include/linux/bitops.h, ../include/linux/kernel.h, ../arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h, ../arch/x86/include/asm/current.h, ...): ../include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:26:1: warning: unreplaced symbol 'return' <asm/byteorder.h> was included in both drivers/mfd/ocelot-spi.c and drivers/mfd/ocelot.h previously, though Andy pointed out there didn't seem to be any users... and I didn't either. I'm sure there's something I must be missing. > * Utilize resource_size() function >
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 07:19:13AM -0700, Colin Foster wrote: > Something is going on that I don't fully understand with <asm/byteorder.h>. > I don't quite see how ocelot-core is throwing all sorts of errors in x86 > builds now: > > https://patchwork.hopto.org/static/nipa/667471/12942993/build_allmodconfig_warn/stderr > > Snippet from there: > > /home/nipa/nipa/tests/patch/build_32bit/build_32bit.sh: line 21: ccache gcc: command not found > ../drivers/mfd/ocelot-spi.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/bitops.h, ../include/linux/kernel.h, ../arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h, ../arch/x86/include/asm/current.h, ../include/linux/sched.h, ...): > ../arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:66:1: warning: unreplaced symbol 'return' > ../drivers/mfd/ocelot-spi.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/bitops.h, ../include/linux/kernel.h, ../arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h, ../arch/x86/include/asm/current.h, ../include/linux/sched.h, ...): > ../include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h:29:9: warning: unreplaced symbol 'mask' > ../include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h:30:9: warning: unreplaced symbol 'p' > ../include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h:32:10: warning: unreplaced symbol 'p' > ../include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h:32:16: warning: unreplaced symbol 'mask' > ../include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h:27:1: warning: unreplaced symbol 'return' > ../drivers/mfd/ocelot-spi.c: note: in included file (through ../arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h, ../include/linux/bitops.h, ../include/linux/kernel.h, ../arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h, ../arch/x86/include/asm/current.h, ...): > ../include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:26:1: warning: unreplaced symbol 'return' > > > <asm/byteorder.h> was included in both drivers/mfd/ocelot-spi.c and > drivers/mfd/ocelot.h previously, though Andy pointed out there didn't > seem to be any users... and I didn't either. I'm sure there's something > I must be missing. I got similar errors in our internal CI yesterday. Fixed by compiling sparse from git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/devel/sparse/sparse.git/commit/?id=0e1aae55e49cad7ea43848af5b58ff0f57e7af99 The update is also available in the "testing" repo in case you are running Fedora 35 / 36: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-c58b53730f https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-2bc333ccac
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 05:35:12PM +0300, Ido Schimmel wrote: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 07:19:13AM -0700, Colin Foster wrote: > > Something is going on that I don't fully understand with <asm/byteorder.h>. > > I don't quite see how ocelot-core is throwing all sorts of errors in x86 > > builds now: > > > > https://patchwork.hopto.org/static/nipa/667471/12942993/build_allmodconfig_warn/stderr > > > > Snippet from there: > > > > /home/nipa/nipa/tests/patch/build_32bit/build_32bit.sh: line 21: ccache gcc: command not found > > ../drivers/mfd/ocelot-spi.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/bitops.h, ../include/linux/kernel.h, ../arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h, ../arch/x86/include/asm/current.h, ../include/linux/sched.h, ...): > > ../arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:66:1: warning: unreplaced symbol 'return' > > ../drivers/mfd/ocelot-spi.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/bitops.h, ../include/linux/kernel.h, ../arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h, ../arch/x86/include/asm/current.h, ../include/linux/sched.h, ...): > > ../include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h:29:9: warning: unreplaced symbol 'mask' > > ../include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h:30:9: warning: unreplaced symbol 'p' > > ../include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h:32:10: warning: unreplaced symbol 'p' > > ../include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h:32:16: warning: unreplaced symbol 'mask' > > ../include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h:27:1: warning: unreplaced symbol 'return' > > ../drivers/mfd/ocelot-spi.c: note: in included file (through ../arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h, ../include/linux/bitops.h, ../include/linux/kernel.h, ../arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h, ../arch/x86/include/asm/current.h, ...): > > ../include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:26:1: warning: unreplaced symbol 'return' > > > > > > <asm/byteorder.h> was included in both drivers/mfd/ocelot-spi.c and > > drivers/mfd/ocelot.h previously, though Andy pointed out there didn't > > seem to be any users... and I didn't either. I'm sure there's something > > I must be missing. > > I got similar errors in our internal CI yesterday. Fixed by compiling > sparse from git: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/devel/sparse/sparse.git/commit/?id=0e1aae55e49cad7ea43848af5b58ff0f57e7af99 > > The update is also available in the "testing" repo in case you are > running Fedora 35 / 36: > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-c58b53730f > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-2bc333ccac Thanks for the info! I haven't been able to fully recreate the issue locally, those are from kernel test robot. I'll give this a shot if I run into it locally though.
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 6:20 PM Colin Foster <colin.foster@in-advantage.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 11:52:53AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 5:35 PM Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 07:19:13AM -0700, Colin Foster wrote: > > > > Something is going on that I don't fully understand with <asm/byteorder.h>. > > > > I don't quite see how ocelot-core is throwing all sorts of errors in x86 > > > > builds now: > > > > > > > > https://patchwork.hopto.org/static/nipa/667471/12942993/build_allmodconfig_warn/stderr > > > > > > > > Snippet from there: > > > > > > > > /home/nipa/nipa/tests/patch/build_32bit/build_32bit.sh: line 21: ccache gcc: command not found > > > > ../drivers/mfd/ocelot-spi.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/bitops.h, ../include/linux/kernel.h, ../arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h, ../arch/x86/include/asm/current.h, ../include/linux/sched.h, ...): > > > > ../arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:66:1: warning: unreplaced symbol 'return' > > > > ../drivers/mfd/ocelot-spi.c: note: in included file (through ../include/linux/bitops.h, ../include/linux/kernel.h, ../arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h, ../arch/x86/include/asm/current.h, ../include/linux/sched.h, ...): > > > > ../include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h:29:9: warning: unreplaced symbol 'mask' > > > > ../include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h:30:9: warning: unreplaced symbol 'p' > > > > ../include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h:32:10: warning: unreplaced symbol 'p' > > > > ../include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h:32:16: warning: unreplaced symbol 'mask' > > > > ../include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h:27:1: warning: unreplaced symbol 'return' > > > > ../drivers/mfd/ocelot-spi.c: note: in included file (through ../arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h, ../include/linux/bitops.h, ../include/linux/kernel.h, ../arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h, ../arch/x86/include/asm/current.h, ...): > > > > ../include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:26:1: warning: unreplaced symbol 'return' > > > > > > > > > > > > <asm/byteorder.h> was included in both drivers/mfd/ocelot-spi.c and > > > > drivers/mfd/ocelot.h previously, though Andy pointed out there didn't > > > > seem to be any users... and I didn't either. I'm sure there's something > > > > I must be missing. > > > > > > I got similar errors in our internal CI yesterday. Fixed by compiling > > > sparse from git: > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/devel/sparse/sparse.git/commit/?id=0e1aae55e49cad7ea43848af5b58ff0f57e7af99 > > > > > > The update is also available in the "testing" repo in case you are > > > running Fedora 35 / 36: > > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-c58b53730f > > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-2bc333ccac > > > > Debian still produces the same errors which makes sparse useless. > > I haven't jumped into this one yet. But everything seems to be compiling > and running in ARM. > > Do you think this is a false positive / unrelated to this patch? Or do > you think this is a true error that I did wrong? I haven't been around > for too many releases, so I'm not sure if this is common after an -rc1. It's a sparse issue and Debian maintainer for sparse is not updating it for some reasons...
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 10:26:12PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 6:20 PM Colin Foster > <colin.foster@in-advantage.com> wrote: > > > > Do you think this is a false positive / unrelated to this patch? Or do > > you think this is a true error that I did wrong? I haven't been around > > for too many releases, so I'm not sure if this is common after an -rc1. > > It's a sparse issue and Debian maintainer for sparse is not updating > it for some reasons... K. I'll ignore for now and plan to re-submit next week (with Lee's correct email address) unless I hear otherwise. Thanks! > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko