mbox series

[0/4] memory: omap-gpmc: Add AM64 SoC support

Message ID 20211123102607.13002-1-rogerq@kernel.org
Headers show
Series memory: omap-gpmc: Add AM64 SoC support | expand

Message

Roger Quadros Nov. 23, 2021, 10:26 a.m. UTC
Hi,

TI's AM64 SoC contains one GPMC module. Add driver support for it.

cheers,
-roger

Roger Quadros (4):
  dt-bindings: memory-controllers: ti,gpmc: Add compatible for AM64
  memory: omap-gpmc: Fix menuconfig visibility
  memory: omap-gpmc: Add support for GPMC on AM64 SoC
  memory: omap-gpmc: check for nand node name instead of just
    compatibility

 .../bindings/memory-controllers/ti,gpmc.yaml  | 12 +++++-
 drivers/memory/Kconfig                        |  4 +-
 drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c                    | 43 ++++++++++++++-----
 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

Comments

Roger Quadros Nov. 23, 2021, 10:27 a.m. UTC | #1
please ignore this. Went out by mistake.

On 23/11/2021 12:26, Roger Quadros wrote:
> GPMC was not being visible if COMPILE_TEST is not enabled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/memory/Kconfig | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/memory/Kconfig b/drivers/memory/Kconfig
> index 30bff6cb1b8d..da2af9c38fe3 100644
> --- a/drivers/memory/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/memory/Kconfig
> @@ -103,8 +103,8 @@ config TI_EMIF
>  	  temperature changes
>  
>  config OMAP_GPMC
> -	bool "Texas Instruments OMAP SoC GPMC driver" if COMPILE_TEST
> -	depends on OF_ADDRESS
> +	bool "Texas Instruments OMAP SoC GPMC driver"
> +	depends on OF_ADDRESS || COMPILE_TEST
>  	select GPIOLIB
>  	help
>  	  This driver is for the General Purpose Memory Controller (GPMC)
>
Roger Quadros Nov. 23, 2021, 10:28 a.m. UTC | #2
Please ignore this one as well.

On 23/11/2021 12:26, Roger Quadros wrote:
> The TI's AM64 SoC has the GPMC module. Add compatible for it.
> 
> Traditionally GPMC external addresses have always been mapped to first
> 1GB physical address. However newer platforms, can have it mapped
> at different locations. Support this address provision via device tree.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c b/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
> index be0858bff4d3..624153048182 100644
> --- a/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
> @@ -237,6 +237,7 @@ struct gpmc_device {
>  	struct omap3_gpmc_regs context;
>  	int nirqs;
>  	unsigned int is_suspended:1;
> +	struct resource *data;
>  };
>  
>  static struct irq_domain *gpmc_irq_domain;
> @@ -1456,12 +1457,18 @@ static void gpmc_mem_exit(void)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static void gpmc_mem_init(void)
> +static void gpmc_mem_init(struct gpmc_device *gpmc)
>  {
>  	int cs;
>  
> -	gpmc_mem_root.start = GPMC_MEM_START;
> -	gpmc_mem_root.end = GPMC_MEM_END;
> +	if (!gpmc->data) {
> +		/* All legacy devices have same data IO window */
> +		gpmc_mem_root.start = GPMC_MEM_START;
> +		gpmc_mem_root.end = GPMC_MEM_END;
> +	} else {
> +		gpmc_mem_root.start = gpmc->data->start;
> +		gpmc_mem_root.end = gpmc->data->end;
> +	}
>  
>  	/* Reserve all regions that has been set up by bootloader */
>  	for (cs = 0; cs < gpmc_cs_num; cs++) {
> @@ -1888,6 +1895,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id gpmc_dt_ids[] = {
>  	{ .compatible = "ti,omap3430-gpmc" },	/* omap3430 & omap3630 */
>  	{ .compatible = "ti,omap4430-gpmc" },	/* omap4430 & omap4460 & omap543x */
>  	{ .compatible = "ti,am3352-gpmc" },	/* am335x devices */
> +	{ .compatible = "ti,am64-gpmc" },
>  	{ }
>  };
>  
> @@ -2502,13 +2510,25 @@ static int gpmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	gpmc->dev = &pdev->dev;
>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, gpmc);
>  
> -	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> -	if (!res)
> -		return -ENOENT;
> +	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "cfg");
> +	if (!res) {
> +		/* legacy DT */
> +		gpmc_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> +		if (IS_ERR(gpmc_base))
> +			return PTR_ERR(gpmc_base);
> +	} else {
> +		gpmc_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
> +		if (IS_ERR(gpmc_base))
> +			return PTR_ERR(gpmc_base);
> +
> +		res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "data");
> +		if (!res) {
> +			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "couldn't get data reg resource\n");
> +			return -ENOENT;
> +		}
>  
> -	gpmc_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
> -	if (IS_ERR(gpmc_base))
> -		return PTR_ERR(gpmc_base);
> +		gpmc->data = res;
> +	}
>  
>  	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, 0);
>  	if (!res) {
> @@ -2562,7 +2582,7 @@ static int gpmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	dev_info(gpmc->dev, "GPMC revision %d.%d\n", GPMC_REVISION_MAJOR(l),
>  		 GPMC_REVISION_MINOR(l));
>  
> -	gpmc_mem_init();
> +	gpmc_mem_init(gpmc);
>  	rc = gpmc_gpio_init(gpmc);
>  	if (rc)
>  		goto gpio_init_failed;
>
Krzysztof Kozlowski Nov. 23, 2021, 7:43 p.m. UTC | #3
On 23/11/2021 11:26, Roger Quadros wrote:
> GPMC was not being visible if COMPILE_TEST is not enabled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/memory/Kconfig | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 

... which was probably on purpose, similarly to many other SoC drivers
which are selected by platform. Therefore there is no bug to fix here -
lack of visibility is not a problem. Please document instead why you
want to change it, e.g. why this is a problem or unwanted behavior.

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Roger Quadros Nov. 25, 2021, 12:09 p.m. UTC | #4
On 23/11/2021 21:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 23/11/2021 11:26, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> GPMC was not being visible if COMPILE_TEST is not enabled.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/memory/Kconfig | 4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
> 
> ... which was probably on purpose, similarly to many other SoC drivers
> which are selected by platform. Therefore there is no bug to fix here -
> lack of visibility is not a problem. Please document instead why you
> want to change it, e.g. why this is a problem or unwanted behavior.
> 

No strong enough reason. I'll drop this patch.

cheers,
-roger