mbox series

[V3,00/13] soc: imx: gpcv2: support i.MX8MM

Message ID 20210510040045.13225-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com
Headers show
Series soc: imx: gpcv2: support i.MX8MM | expand

Message

Peng Fan (OSS) May 10, 2021, 4 a.m. UTC
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>

V3:
 Add R-b/T-b tag from Frieder
 For Patch 8, add the explaination in yaml file per Rob and Frieder

V2:
 - Add R-b/A-b tag
 - Merge V1 patch 13 to V2 patch 6
 - Drop V1 patch 15
 - Merge V1 patch 16 to V2 patch 5 and add comments in patch 5 to explain
 details
 - Add explaination in patch 8 for "why the resets are not defined"

This patchset is a pick up Lucas's gpcv2 work for i.MX8MM and several
minor changes from me to make it could work with i.MX BLK-CTL driver.

Thanks for Lucas's work and suggestion, Frieder Schrempf for collecting
all the patches, Jacky Bai on help debug issues.


Lucas Stach (12):
  soc: imx: gpcv2: move to more ideomatic error handling in probe
  soc: imx: gpcv2: move domain mapping to domain driver probe
  soc: imx: gpcv2: switch to clk_bulk_* API
  soc: imx: gpcv2: split power up and power down sequence control
  soc: imx: gpcv2: wait for ADB400 handshake
  soc: imx: gpcv2: add runtime PM support for power-domains
  soc: imx: gpcv2: allow domains without power-sequence control
  dt-bindings: imx: gpcv2: add support for optional resets
  soc: imx: gpcv2: add support for optional resets
  dt-bindings: power: add defines for i.MX8MM power domains
  soc: imx: gpcv2: add support for i.MX8MM power domains
  soc: imx: gpcv2: Add support for missing i.MX8MM VPU/DISPMIX power
    domains

Peng Fan (1):
  soc: imx: gpcv2: move reset assert after requesting domain power up

 .../bindings/power/fsl,imx-gpcv2.yaml         |  12 +
 drivers/soc/imx/gpcv2.c                       | 542 ++++++++++++++----
 include/dt-bindings/power/imx8mm-power.h      |  22 +
 3 files changed, 461 insertions(+), 115 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/power/imx8mm-power.h

Comments

Shawn Guo May 23, 2021, 2:59 a.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 12:00:34PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
> 
> As long as the power domain driver is active we want power control
> over the domain (which is what the mapping bit requests), so there
> is no point in whacking it for every power control action, simply
> set the bit in driver probe and clear it when the driver is removed.
> 
> Tested-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
> Reviewed-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>

You forgot your SoB.  I fixed it up and applied the series.

Shawn