| Message ID | 52fd38fd.870eec0a.7f7f.13a5@mx.google.com |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | 83fb9bb738ae17bf2f11ae3e25250c035a8a7dba |
| Headers | show |
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:38 PM, <kuyurix@gmail.com> wrote: > From: Marcelo Gutierrez <kuyurix@gmail.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Gutierrez <kuyurix@gmail.com> > --- > package/ti-gfx/ti-gfx.mk | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/package/ti-gfx/ti-gfx.mk b/package/ti-gfx/ti-gfx.mk > index a94f00d..5ea6b92 100644 > --- a/package/ti-gfx/ti-gfx.mk > +++ b/package/ti-gfx/ti-gfx.mk > @@ -4,13 +4,13 @@ > # > ################################################################################ > > -TI_GFX_VERSION = 4_09_00_01 > -TI_GFX_SO_VERSION = 1.9.2188537 > +TI_GFX_VERSION = 5_01_00_01 > +TI_GFX_SO_VERSION = 1.10.2359475 > > ifeq ($(BR2_ARM_EABIHF),y) > -TI_GFX_SOURCE = Graphics_SDK_setuplinux_$(TI_GFX_VERSION)_hardfp_minimal_demos.bin > +TI_GFX_SOURCE = Graphics_SDK_setuplinux_hardfp_$(TI_GFX_VERSION).bin > else > -TI_GFX_SOURCE = Graphics_SDK_setuplinux_$(TI_GFX_VERSION)_minimal_demos.bin > +TI_GFX_SOURCE = Graphics_SDK_setuplinux_softfp_$(TI_GFX_VERSION).bin > endif > > TI_GFX_SITE = http://downloads.ti.com/dsps/dsps_public_sw/sdo_sb/targetcontent/gfxsdk/$(TI_GFX_VERSION)/exports/ > -- > 1.7.9.5 > > _______________________________________________ > buildroot mailing list > buildroot@busybox.net > http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot Marcelo Gutierrez, Please see the following site. The 5_01_00_01 version is not a supported version; it is of alpha quality and has several deficiencies. http://tigraphics.blogspot.com/2013/11/4q-2013-linux-graphics-sdk-release.html Thanks, Spenser
Hi Spenser, Please see the following site. The 5_01_00_01 version is not a > supported version; it is of alpha quality and has several > deficiencies. > > > http://tigraphics.blogspot.com/2013/11/4q-2013-linux-graphics-sdk-release.html > I've tested Graphics SDK 5_01_00_01 and run great! This is the release note: http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/RN_5_01_00_01 The link that you've sent is about 5_00_00_01_alpha version and maybe that version got several issues. On the other hand, a feature in this release(5_01_00_01) is " 3.12 kernel support" and if you take a look this commit "beaglebone: update to TI 3.12 kernel" http://git.buildroot.net/buildroot/commit/configs?id=1ca56e4e159cd5dd44cd3aba997396d49f22ecda The new update to TI 3.12 will not work with the actual version "TI_GFX_VERSION = 4_09_00_01" Regards, Marcelo
Hi all, I'm using hardfloat: $readelf -A output/target/bin/busybox Attribute Section: aeabi File Attributes Tag_CPU_name: "7-A" Tag_CPU_arch: v7 Tag_CPU_arch_profile: Application Tag_ARM_ISA_use: Yes Tag_THUMB_ISA_use: Thumb-2 Tag_FP_arch: VFPv3 Tag_Advanced_SIMD_arch: NEONv1 Tag_ABI_PCS_wchar_t: 4 Tag_ABI_FP_rounding: Needed Tag_ABI_FP_denormal: Needed Tag_ABI_FP_exceptions: Needed Tag_ABI_FP_number_model: IEEE 754 Tag_ABI_align_needed: 8-byte Tag_ABI_align_preserved: 8-byte, except leaf SP Tag_ABI_enum_size: int Tag_ABI_HardFP_use: SP and DP Tag_ABI_VFP_args: VFP registers Tag_CPU_unaligned_access: v6 Tag_Virtualization_use: TrustZone $readelf -A pvrsrvctl Attribute Section: aeabi File Attributes Tag_CPU_name: "7-A" Tag_CPU_arch: v7 Tag_CPU_arch_profile: Application Tag_ARM_ISA_use: Yes Tag_THUMB_ISA_use: Thumb-2 Tag_FP_arch: VFPv3-D16 Tag_ABI_PCS_wchar_t: 4 Tag_ABI_FP_denormal: Needed Tag_ABI_FP_exceptions: Needed Tag_ABI_FP_number_model: IEEE 754 Tag_ABI_align_needed: 8-byte Tag_ABI_align_preserved: 8-byte, except leaf SP Tag_ABI_enum_size: int Tag_ABI_HardFP_use: SP and DP Tag_ABI_VFP_args: VFP registers Tag_CPU_unaligned_access: v6 Tag_DIV_use: Not allowed I tested 5_01_00_01 version on BBB. >[ 15.008605] CPU: 0 Tainted: G W (3.0.50-vallon #1) Your kernel version is 3.0.50 and that could be the issue. The release notes contain this instruction: >Pre-requisites > >Kernel(Linux PSP) versions supported or used for validation > >Only the following devices have been tested & details below - > >AM335x & AM43x - > >Tree: git://git.ti.com/ti-linux-kernel/ti-linux-kernel.git >Branch: ti-linux-3.12.y >commit - dfea149efb32485f17bb7440eb326549c8f647e2, tag - ti2013.12.00 > >NOTE- >1.Ensure the reset controller driver is enabled in kernel menuconfig if not enabled by default as below- >CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_RESET_CONTROLLER=y >CONFIG_RESET_CONTROLLER=y >CONFIG_RESET_TI=y Regards, Marcelo
> > Your kernel version is 3.0.50 and that could be the issue. Indeed, seems my kernel is too old. Thanks for the explanation. Peter > > The release notes contain this instruction: > >Pre-requisites > > > >Kernel(Linux PSP) versions supported or used for validation > > > >Only the following devices have been tested & details below - > > > >AM335x & AM43x - > > > >Tree: git://git.ti.com/ti-linux-kernel/ti-linux-kernel.git > >Branch: ti-linux-3.12.y > >commit - dfea149efb32485f17bb7440eb326549c8f647e2, tag - ti2013.12.00 > > > >NOTE- > >1.Ensure the reset controller driver is enabled in kernel menuconfig if not enabled by default as below- > >CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_RESET_CONTROLLER=y > >CONFIG_RESET_CONTROLLER=y > >CONFIG_RESET_TI=y > > Regards, > Marcelo >
You're welcome. ;-) Regards, Marcelo
Marcelo, All, On 2014-02-13 18:38 +0000, kuyurix@gmail.com spake thusly: > From: Marcelo Gutierrez <kuyurix@gmail.com> > > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Gutierrez <kuyurix@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr> Notes: - The version pointed to by Spencer was 5.00.x, and was a beta version, and only contained the hardfp variant. The version in this patch is 5.01.x, is not marked as beta, and contains both the hardfp and softfp variants. - With 4.10.x and before, the *_$(TI_GFX_VERSION).bin archive would contain a huge load of stuff we did not need, and was roughly 1.7GiB big. But with 5.01.x, this file is now back to a more acceptable size, roughly 140MiB (although it still contains way much more than we need). Regards, Yann E. MORIN. > --- > package/ti-gfx/ti-gfx.mk | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/package/ti-gfx/ti-gfx.mk b/package/ti-gfx/ti-gfx.mk > index a94f00d..5ea6b92 100644 > --- a/package/ti-gfx/ti-gfx.mk > +++ b/package/ti-gfx/ti-gfx.mk > @@ -4,13 +4,13 @@ > # > ################################################################################ > > -TI_GFX_VERSION = 4_09_00_01 > -TI_GFX_SO_VERSION = 1.9.2188537 > +TI_GFX_VERSION = 5_01_00_01 > +TI_GFX_SO_VERSION = 1.10.2359475 > > ifeq ($(BR2_ARM_EABIHF),y) > -TI_GFX_SOURCE = Graphics_SDK_setuplinux_$(TI_GFX_VERSION)_hardfp_minimal_demos.bin > +TI_GFX_SOURCE = Graphics_SDK_setuplinux_hardfp_$(TI_GFX_VERSION).bin > else > -TI_GFX_SOURCE = Graphics_SDK_setuplinux_$(TI_GFX_VERSION)_minimal_demos.bin > +TI_GFX_SOURCE = Graphics_SDK_setuplinux_softfp_$(TI_GFX_VERSION).bin > endif > > TI_GFX_SITE = http://downloads.ti.com/dsps/dsps_public_sw/sdo_sb/targetcontent/gfxsdk/$(TI_GFX_VERSION)/exports/ > -- > 1.7.9.5 > > _______________________________________________ > buildroot mailing list > buildroot@busybox.net > http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
>>>>> "Yann" == Yann E MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr> writes: > Marcelo, All, > On 2014-02-13 18:38 +0000, kuyurix@gmail.com spake thusly: >> From: Marcelo Gutierrez <kuyurix@gmail.com> >> >> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Gutierrez <kuyurix@gmail.com> > Reviewed-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr> > Notes: > - The version pointed to by Spencer was 5.00.x, and was a beta > version, and only contained the hardfp variant. The version in > this patch is 5.01.x, is not marked as beta, and contains both > the hardfp and softfp variants. > - With 4.10.x and before, the *_$(TI_GFX_VERSION).bin archive would > contain a huge load of stuff we did not need, and was roughly > 1.7GiB big. But with 5.01.x, this file is now back to a more > acceptable size, roughly 140MiB (although it still contains way > much more than we need). Sounds good. Committed to next, thanks both.
>>>>> "Peter" == Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org> writes: >>>>> "Yann" == Yann E MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr> writes: >> Marcelo, All, >> On 2014-02-13 18:38 +0000, kuyurix@gmail.com spake thusly: >>> From: Marcelo Gutierrez <kuyurix@gmail.com> >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Gutierrez <kuyurix@gmail.com> >> Reviewed-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr> >> Notes: >> - The version pointed to by Spencer was 5.00.x, and was a beta >> version, and only contained the hardfp variant. The version in >> this patch is 5.01.x, is not marked as beta, and contains both >> the hardfp and softfp variants. >> - With 4.10.x and before, the *_$(TI_GFX_VERSION).bin archive would >> contain a huge load of stuff we did not need, and was roughly >> 1.7GiB big. But with 5.01.x, this file is now back to a more >> acceptable size, roughly 140MiB (although it still contains way >> much more than we need). > Sounds good. Committed to next, thanks both. Ehh, but the newclkapi patch no longer applies: Applying ti-gfx-newclkapi.patch using patch: patching file GFX_Linux_KM/services4/system/omap3630/sysutils_linux.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 153. Hunk #2 FAILED at 167. Hunk #3 FAILED at 233. Hunk #4 FAILED at 246. Hunk #5 succeeded at 540 (offset 166 lines). Hunk #6 FAILED at 444. Hunk #7 FAILED at 490. 6 out of 7 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file GFX_Linux_KM/services4/system/omap3630/sysutils_linux.c.rej Patch failed! Please fix ti-gfx-newclkapi.patch! make: *** [/home/peko/source/buildroot/output/build/ti-gfx-5_01_00_01/.stamp_patched] Error 1 Could you please send a patch to fix it? I also see that 5_01_01_01 is out: http://tigraphics.blogspot.be/2014/02/1q-2014-linux-graphics-sdk-release.html
Hi Peter, all Ehh, but the newclkapi patch no longer applies: > > Applying ti-gfx-newclkapi.patch using patch: > patching file GFX_Linux_KM/services4/system/omap3630/sysutils_linux.c > Hunk #1 FAILED at 153. > Hunk #2 FAILED at 167. > Hunk #3 FAILED at 233. > Hunk #4 FAILED at 246. > Hunk #5 succeeded at 540 (offset 166 lines). > Hunk #6 FAILED at 444. > Hunk #7 FAILED at 490. > 6 out of 7 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file > GFX_Linux_KM/services4/system/omap3630/sysutils_linux.c.rej > Patch failed! Please fix ti-gfx-newclkapi.patch! > make: *** [/home/peko/source/buildroot/ > output/build/ti-gfx-5_01_00_01/.stamp_patched] Error 1 > > Could you please send a patch to fix it? > I wonder if we need to apply that patch? All I can say that SGX version works great on BBB(ti-kernel 3.12 using beaglebone_defconfig) Regards, Marcelo 2014-02-26 10:31 GMT-03:00 Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>: > >>>>> "Peter" == Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org> writes: > > >>>>> "Yann" == Yann E MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr> writes: > >> Marcelo, All, > >> On 2014-02-13 18:38 +0000, kuyurix@gmail.com spake thusly: > >>> From: Marcelo Gutierrez <kuyurix@gmail.com> > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Gutierrez <kuyurix@gmail.com> > > >> Reviewed-by: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr> > > >> Notes: > > >> - The version pointed to by Spencer was 5.00.x, and was a beta > >> version, and only contained the hardfp variant. The version in > >> this patch is 5.01.x, is not marked as beta, and contains both > >> the hardfp and softfp variants. > > >> - With 4.10.x and before, the *_$(TI_GFX_VERSION).bin archive would > >> contain a huge load of stuff we did not need, and was roughly > >> 1.7GiB big. But with 5.01.x, this file is now back to a more > >> acceptable size, roughly 140MiB (although it still contains way > >> much more than we need). > > > Sounds good. Committed to next, thanks both. > > Ehh, but the newclkapi patch no longer applies: > > Applying ti-gfx-newclkapi.patch using patch: > patching file GFX_Linux_KM/services4/system/omap3630/sysutils_linux.c > Hunk #1 FAILED at 153. > Hunk #2 FAILED at 167. > Hunk #3 FAILED at 233. > Hunk #4 FAILED at 246. > Hunk #5 succeeded at 540 (offset 166 lines). > Hunk #6 FAILED at 444. > Hunk #7 FAILED at 490. > 6 out of 7 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file > GFX_Linux_KM/services4/system/omap3630/sysutils_linux.c.rej > Patch failed! Please fix ti-gfx-newclkapi.patch! > make: *** > [/home/peko/source/buildroot/output/build/ti-gfx-5_01_00_01/.stamp_patched] > Error 1 > > Could you please send a patch to fix it? > > I also see that 5_01_01_01 is out: > > > http://tigraphics.blogspot.be/2014/02/1q-2014-linux-graphics-sdk-release.html > > -- > Bye, Peter Korsgaard >
diff --git a/package/ti-gfx/ti-gfx.mk b/package/ti-gfx/ti-gfx.mk index a94f00d..5ea6b92 100644 --- a/package/ti-gfx/ti-gfx.mk +++ b/package/ti-gfx/ti-gfx.mk @@ -4,13 +4,13 @@ # ################################################################################ -TI_GFX_VERSION = 4_09_00_01 -TI_GFX_SO_VERSION = 1.9.2188537 +TI_GFX_VERSION = 5_01_00_01 +TI_GFX_SO_VERSION = 1.10.2359475 ifeq ($(BR2_ARM_EABIHF),y) -TI_GFX_SOURCE = Graphics_SDK_setuplinux_$(TI_GFX_VERSION)_hardfp_minimal_demos.bin +TI_GFX_SOURCE = Graphics_SDK_setuplinux_hardfp_$(TI_GFX_VERSION).bin else -TI_GFX_SOURCE = Graphics_SDK_setuplinux_$(TI_GFX_VERSION)_minimal_demos.bin +TI_GFX_SOURCE = Graphics_SDK_setuplinux_softfp_$(TI_GFX_VERSION).bin endif TI_GFX_SITE = http://downloads.ti.com/dsps/dsps_public_sw/sdo_sb/targetcontent/gfxsdk/$(TI_GFX_VERSION)/exports/