| Message ID | 20210518044626.17073-1-bernd.kuhls@t-online.de |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [PATCH/next,1/1] package/libdrm: bump version to 2.4.106 | expand |
Bernd, All, On 2021-05-18 06:46 +0200, Bernd Kuhls spake thusly: > Signed-off-by: Bernd Kuhls <bernd.kuhls@t-online.de> > --- [--SNIP--] > diff --git a/package/libdrm/libdrm.mk b/package/libdrm/libdrm.mk > index f5b205bb00..f18df27687 100644 > --- a/package/libdrm/libdrm.mk > +++ b/package/libdrm/libdrm.mk > @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ > # > ################################################################################ > > -LIBDRM_VERSION = 2.4.105 > +LIBDRM_VERSION = 2.4.106 You tagged that one for next, but this is actually a minor release that fixes a regression, and adds just a bunch of tests and debug here and there.... Is there a reason why that can't be applied to master? Regards, Yann E. MORIN. > LIBDRM_SOURCE = libdrm-$(LIBDRM_VERSION).tar.xz > LIBDRM_SITE = https://dri.freedesktop.org/libdrm > LIBDRM_LICENSE = MIT > -- > 2.29.2 > > _______________________________________________ > buildroot mailing list > buildroot@busybox.net > http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
Am Tue, 18 May 2021 14:01:05 +0200 schrieb Yann E. MORIN: > You tagged that one for next, but this is actually a minor release that > fixes a regression, and adds just a bunch of tests and debug here and > there.... > > Is there a reason why that can't be applied to master? Hi Yann, maybe I am missing some informations but afaics there are no written rules which I can follow when deciding whether a patch is valid for - master or -next. When in doubt, especially with a bump like this one which not only fixes bugs but also adds new code, I prefer to send a patch for -next so Thomas, Peter, Arnout or you can decide otherwise. Regards, Bernd
Bernd, All, On 2021-05-18 17:17 +0200, Bernd Kuhls spake thusly: > Am Tue, 18 May 2021 14:01:05 +0200 schrieb Yann E. MORIN: > > You tagged that one for next, but this is actually a minor release that > > fixes a regression, and adds just a bunch of tests and debug here and > > there.... > > Is there a reason why that can't be applied to master? > maybe I am missing some informations but afaics there are no written > rules which I can follow when deciding whether a patch is valid for - > master or -next. When in doubt, especially with a bump like this one > which not only fixes bugs but also adds new code, I prefer to send a > patch for -next so Thomas, Peter, Arnout or you can decide otherwise. There are no definite rule, indeed. But when a bump ismostly about fixes, it should be for master. In this case, upstream really seems to consider this release as only bug fixes; https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2021-May/307025.html Some nouveau debug, amdgpu tests, and a regression fix from 105. Releasing so 105 doesn't end up being used a lot with a regression. And if you already have a doubt, state so in a post-commit note, to hint us so that we don't have to guess... Applied to master, thanks. Regards, Yann E. MORIN.
diff --git a/package/libdrm/libdrm.hash b/package/libdrm/libdrm.hash index 25c3a042cb..079675824a 100644 --- a/package/libdrm/libdrm.hash +++ b/package/libdrm/libdrm.hash @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ -# From https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2021-April/302515.html -sha256 1d1d024b7cadc63e2b59cddaca94f78864940ab440843841113fbac6afaf2a46 libdrm-2.4.105.tar.xz -sha512 083a04af7208e58be21b89c6ebdbe2db3ba00cd29f0d271bd38bfe97dfca741edafddaaf9b5b95c20fac2c9b700434ea5b21397de26f7073169ad6f5b090f715 libdrm-2.4.105.tar.xz +# From https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2021-May/307025.html +sha256 92d8ac54429b171e087e61c2894dc5399fe6a549b1fbba09fa6a3cb9d4e57bd4 libdrm-2.4.106.tar.xz +sha512 33140e579906ab54b716149056af500c628ce41cd9ae3b0c33496693d2f5903fbcfccee8a942dd1560e1591111ed240da42612d5af5e75558db6f6a85d14617d libdrm-2.4.106.tar.xz # Hash for license file sha256 a69e38953c20a88845cc739c05dd604da4c977844b872e126c91a0ca2e1385b7 xf86drm.c diff --git a/package/libdrm/libdrm.mk b/package/libdrm/libdrm.mk index f5b205bb00..f18df27687 100644 --- a/package/libdrm/libdrm.mk +++ b/package/libdrm/libdrm.mk @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ # ################################################################################ -LIBDRM_VERSION = 2.4.105 +LIBDRM_VERSION = 2.4.106 LIBDRM_SOURCE = libdrm-$(LIBDRM_VERSION).tar.xz LIBDRM_SITE = https://dri.freedesktop.org/libdrm LIBDRM_LICENSE = MIT
Signed-off-by: Bernd Kuhls <bernd.kuhls@t-online.de> --- package/libdrm/libdrm.hash | 6 +++--- package/libdrm/libdrm.mk | 2 +- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)