| Message ID | 1417096808-22464-1-git-send-email-Vincent.Riera@imgtec.com |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Headers | show |
Dear Vicente Olivert Riera, On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 14:00:08 +0000, Vicente Olivert Riera wrote: > - Bump version to 2.02.113 > - Update the hash value > > Signed-off-by: Vicente Olivert Riera <Vincent.Riera@imgtec.com> > --- > package/lvm2/lvm2.hash | 2 +- > package/lvm2/lvm2.mk | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Applied, thanks. Thomas
>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> writes: > Dear Vicente Olivert Riera, > On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 14:00:08 +0000, Vicente Olivert Riera wrote: >> - Bump version to 2.02.113 >> - Update the hash value >> >> Signed-off-by: Vicente Olivert Riera <Vincent.Riera@imgtec.com> >> --- >> package/lvm2/lvm2.hash | 2 +- >> package/lvm2/lvm2.mk | 2 +- >> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > Applied, thanks. NIT: It's handy if you explicitly state that the patches are applied to the next branch.
Peter, On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 22:52:34 +0100, Peter Korsgaard wrote: > > Applied, thanks. > > NIT: It's handy if you explicitly state that the patches are applied to the > next branch. Agreed, missed this detail in my notifications tonight, sorry about that. Thomas
Dear Peter and Thomas, On 11/27/2014 09:58 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Peter, > > On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 22:52:34 +0100, Peter Korsgaard wrote: > >> > Applied, thanks. >> >> NIT: It's handy if you explicitly state that the patches are applied to the >> next branch. > > Agreed, missed this detail in my notifications tonight, sorry about > that. > > Thomas > sorry guys, I will add that information to my commit messages in future patches for the next branch. Cheers,
>>>>> "Vicente" == Vicente Olivert Riera <Vincent.Riera@imgtec.com> writes: Hi, >>> NIT: It's handy if you explicitly state that the patches are applied to the >>> next branch. >> >> Agreed, missed this detail in my notifications tonight, sorry about >> that. >> >> Thomas > sorry guys, I will add that information to my commit messages in future > patches for the next branch. Thanks, but my comment was actually to Thomas that he should make it clear to you (and others) that he has applied the patch to the next branch, not to master.
diff --git a/package/lvm2/lvm2.hash b/package/lvm2/lvm2.hash index 3d02e83..adffcdb 100644 --- a/package/lvm2/lvm2.hash +++ b/package/lvm2/lvm2.hash @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ # From ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/lvm2/md5.sum -md5 1f4033b750f68b68e9bd66d3661a2c3f LVM2.2.02.112.tgz +md5 f71aa8e64030f3d2a3fdabcc36e45094 LVM2.2.02.113.tgz diff --git a/package/lvm2/lvm2.mk b/package/lvm2/lvm2.mk index bef22fb..48a3116 100644 --- a/package/lvm2/lvm2.mk +++ b/package/lvm2/lvm2.mk @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ # ################################################################################ -LVM2_VERSION = 2.02.112 +LVM2_VERSION = 2.02.113 LVM2_SOURCE = LVM2.$(LVM2_VERSION).tgz LVM2_SITE = ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/lvm2/releases LVM2_INSTALL_STAGING = YES
- Bump version to 2.02.113 - Update the hash value Signed-off-by: Vicente Olivert Riera <Vincent.Riera@imgtec.com> --- package/lvm2/lvm2.hash | 2 +- package/lvm2/lvm2.mk | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)