| Message ID | 1381200417.18302.3.camel@phoenix |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
Dear Axel Lin, On Tue, 08 Oct 2013 10:46:57 +0800, Axel Lin wrote: > Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com> > --- > package/stress/stress.mk | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/package/stress/stress.mk b/package/stress/stress.mk > index 6e82b50..387166d 100644 > --- a/package/stress/stress.mk > +++ b/package/stress/stress.mk > @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ > > STRESS_VERSION = 1.0.4 > STRESS_SITE = http://people.seas.harvard.edu/~apw/stress > +STRESS_LICENSE = GPLv3+ > +STRESS_LICENSE_FILES = COPYING Hum, the situation is a bit weird: * The homepage of the project states " It is written in C, and is free software licensed under the GPLv2." * The tarball contains a COPYING file which is a copy of the GPLv3. * The source code itself contains the mention: This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. So in the end, it's hard to decide whether it's GPLv2+ or GPLv3+. Maybe you could contact the author of 'stress' and clarify the situation? Best regards, Thomas
2013/10/8 Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>: > Dear Axel Lin, > > On Tue, 08 Oct 2013 10:46:57 +0800, Axel Lin wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com> >> --- >> package/stress/stress.mk | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/package/stress/stress.mk b/package/stress/stress.mk >> index 6e82b50..387166d 100644 >> --- a/package/stress/stress.mk >> +++ b/package/stress/stress.mk >> @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ >> >> STRESS_VERSION = 1.0.4 >> STRESS_SITE = http://people.seas.harvard.edu/~apw/stress >> +STRESS_LICENSE = GPLv3+ >> +STRESS_LICENSE_FILES = COPYING > > Hum, the situation is a bit weird: > > * The homepage of the project states " It is written in C, and is free > software licensed under the GPLv2." > > * The tarball contains a COPYING file which is a copy of the GPLv3. > > * The source code itself contains the mention: > > This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or > modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as > published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the > License, or (at your option) any later version. > > So in the end, it's hard to decide whether it's GPLv2+ or GPLv3+. Maybe > you could contact the author of 'stress' and clarify the situation? OK. I just sent a mail to the author for clarifying the license issue. Regards, Axel
diff --git a/package/stress/stress.mk b/package/stress/stress.mk index 6e82b50..387166d 100644 --- a/package/stress/stress.mk +++ b/package/stress/stress.mk @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ STRESS_VERSION = 1.0.4 STRESS_SITE = http://people.seas.harvard.edu/~apw/stress +STRESS_LICENSE = GPLv3+ +STRESS_LICENSE_FILES = COPYING STRESS_AUTORECONF = YES # Stress is linked statically if the --enable-static is specified.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com> --- package/stress/stress.mk | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)