| Message ID | 20200407111515.21131-1-jagan@amarulasolutions.com |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | package/python-scipy: new package | expand |
Hello Jagan, On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 16:45:10 +0530 Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> wrote: > This is v8 changes for python-scipy, here is the previous > version series[1]. Thanks for this new iteration. Could you have a look at the backlog of patches at http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/buildroot/list/ and update any patch that is no longer relevant due to this new iteration to the state "Superseded" ? You can do that yourself for the patches that you have sent (provided that you have a patchwork account matching the e-mail used to send the patches). For the other patches, you can simply let us know, and we'll update the patch status. This helps us keep a patchwork backlog that makes sense. Thanks! Thomas
Hi Thomas, On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 5:19 PM Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> wrote: > > Hello Jagan, > > On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 16:45:10 +0530 > Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> wrote: > > > This is v8 changes for python-scipy, here is the previous > > version series[1]. > > Thanks for this new iteration. Could you have a look at the backlog of > patches at http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/buildroot/list/ and > update any patch that is no longer relevant due to this new iteration > to the state "Superseded" ? You can do that yourself for the patches > that you have sent (provided that you have a patchwork account matching > the e-mail used to send the patches). For the other patches, you can > simply let us know, and we'll update the patch status. > > This helps us keep a patchwork backlog that makes sense. Yes, I've updated all my previous version changes. regarding pybind11, adam has this series [2]. I already incorporated test patch in my series as per his request. [2] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/buildroot/list/?series=145831 Jagan.
Jagan, All, On 2020-04-07 19:13 +0530, Jagan Teki spake thusly: > On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 5:19 PM Thomas Petazzoni > <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 16:45:10 +0530 > > Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> wrote: > > > This is v8 changes for python-scipy, here is the previous > > > version series[1]. > > Thanks for this new iteration. Could you have a look at the backlog of > > patches at http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/buildroot/list/ and > > update any patch that is no longer relevant due to this new iteration > > to the state "Superseded" ? You can do that yourself for the patches > > that you have sent (provided that you have a patchwork account matching > > the e-mail used to send the patches). For the other patches, you can > > simply let us know, and we'll update the patch status. > > > > This helps us keep a patchwork backlog that makes sense. > > Yes, I've updated all my previous version changes. regarding pybind11, > adam has this series [2]. I already incorporated test patch in my > series as per his request. > [2] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/buildroot/list/?series=145831 So I've marked the seriers from Adam as superseded. However, there was a review of his pybind11 patch: since it installs only a header, it should be _INSTALL_TARGET = NO Regards, Yann E. MORIN.
Hi Yann, On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 8:31 PM Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr> wrote: > > Jagan, All, > > On 2020-04-07 19:13 +0530, Jagan Teki spake thusly: > > On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 5:19 PM Thomas Petazzoni > > <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 16:45:10 +0530 > > > Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> wrote: > > > > This is v8 changes for python-scipy, here is the previous > > > > version series[1]. > > > Thanks for this new iteration. Could you have a look at the backlog of > > > patches at http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/buildroot/list/ and > > > update any patch that is no longer relevant due to this new iteration > > > to the state "Superseded" ? You can do that yourself for the patches > > > that you have sent (provided that you have a patchwork account matching > > > the e-mail used to send the patches). For the other patches, you can > > > simply let us know, and we'll update the patch status. > > > > > > This helps us keep a patchwork backlog that makes sense. > > > > Yes, I've updated all my previous version changes. regarding pybind11, > > adam has this series [2]. I already incorporated test patch in my > > series as per his request. > > [2] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/buildroot/list/?series=145831 > > So I've marked the seriers from Adam as superseded. > > However, there was a review of his pybind11 patch: since it installs > only a header, it should be _INSTALL_TARGET = NO The main difference between Adam vs my patch is I'm trying to build pybind11 as a host package as it has dependency with scipy. If Adam is required to use even for target, maybe he can add a patch on top of this to support the target package. Let me know if it makes sense or any other thoughts? Jagan.
Hi Yann, On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 9:48 PM Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> wrote: > > Hi Yann, > > On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 8:31 PM Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr> wrote: > > > > Jagan, All, > > > > On 2020-04-07 19:13 +0530, Jagan Teki spake thusly: > > > On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 5:19 PM Thomas Petazzoni > > > <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 16:45:10 +0530 > > > > Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> wrote: > > > > > This is v8 changes for python-scipy, here is the previous > > > > > version series[1]. > > > > Thanks for this new iteration. Could you have a look at the backlog of > > > > patches at http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/buildroot/list/ and > > > > update any patch that is no longer relevant due to this new iteration > > > > to the state "Superseded" ? You can do that yourself for the patches > > > > that you have sent (provided that you have a patchwork account matching > > > > the e-mail used to send the patches). For the other patches, you can > > > > simply let us know, and we'll update the patch status. > > > > > > > > This helps us keep a patchwork backlog that makes sense. > > > > > > Yes, I've updated all my previous version changes. regarding pybind11, > > > adam has this series [2]. I already incorporated test patch in my > > > series as per his request. > > > [2] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/buildroot/list/?series=145831 > > > > So I've marked the seriers from Adam as superseded. > > > > However, there was a review of his pybind11 patch: since it installs > > only a header, it should be _INSTALL_TARGET = NO > > The main difference between Adam vs my patch is I'm trying to build > pybind11 as a host package as it has dependency with scipy. If Adam is > required to use even for target, maybe he can add a patch on top of > this to support the target package. Let me know if it makes sense or > any other thoughts? Any update on this? Jagan.