| Message ID | 20171112201646.15558-1-geomatsi@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | Add support for MacchiatoBin board | expand |
On 12-11-17 21:16, Sergey Matyukevich wrote: > Hi all, > > This patchset adds support for SolidRun MacchiatoBin board based on > Marvell Armada 8040 SoC. For convenience the following two different > build configurations are added: > > - mainline BSP > mainline Linux v4.13.11 and U-Boot v2017.09 > > - vendor BSP (enables more hardware) > BSP from Marvell based on Linux 4.4.52 and U-Boot v2017.03 Do we really want to have defconfigs for both upstream and vendor BSP? Especially because we will also probably have a graphical defconfig later... This way, we end up with 3-4 defconfigs per board, for dozens of boards... That said, I do think it is useful to have both of these for this specific board. It's just that I'm afraid we're going to be overwhelmed by the number of defconfigs... What do the others think? Regards, Arnout > > Patches are rebased on top of next branch. > > Regards, > Sergey > > Sergey Matyukevich (5): > armada-firmware: new package > armada-ddr: new package > atf: add support for Marvell Armada SoCs > solidrun/macchiatobin: add new board > DEVELOPERS: add myself to MacchiatoBin releated packages > > DEVELOPERS | 6 + > board/solidrun/macchiatobin/genimage.cfg | 16 +++++ > board/solidrun/macchiatobin/readme.txt | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > boot/Config.in | 2 > boot/arm-trusted-firmware/arm-trusted-firmware.mk | 13 ++++ > boot/armada-ddr/Config.in | 16 +++++ > boot/armada-ddr/armada-ddr.hash | 2 > boot/armada-ddr/armada-ddr.mk | 20 ++++++ > boot/armada-firmware/Config.in | 19 +++++ > boot/armada-firmware/armada-firmware.hash | 2 > boot/armada-firmware/armada-firmware.mk | 18 +++++ > configs/solidrun_macchiatobin_mainline_defconfig | 46 ++++++++++++++ > configs/solidrun_macchiatobin_marvell_defconfig | 48 +++++++++++++++ > 13 files changed, 278 insertions(+) > _______________________________________________ > buildroot mailing list > buildroot@busybox.net > http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot >
Hi Arnout, On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:58:43PM +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: > On 12-11-17 21:16, Sergey Matyukevich wrote: > > This patchset adds support for SolidRun MacchiatoBin board based on > > Marvell Armada 8040 SoC. For convenience the following two different > > build configurations are added: > > > > - mainline BSP > > mainline Linux v4.13.11 and U-Boot v2017.09 > > > > - vendor BSP (enables more hardware) > > BSP from Marvell based on Linux 4.4.52 and U-Boot v2017.03 > > Do we really want to have defconfigs for both upstream and vendor BSP? > Especially because we will also probably have a graphical defconfig later... > This way, we end up with 3-4 defconfigs per board, for dozens of boards... > > That said, I do think it is useful to have both of these for this specific > board. It's just that I'm afraid we're going to be overwhelmed by the number of > defconfigs... > > What do the others think? This board has no native graphic interface. So you can think of it as a basic (mainline) defconfig, and a fully featured (vendor) defconfig. This is similar to the basic and "demo" defconfigs that we have for other boards. baruch