@@ -1597,7 +1597,6 @@ static int nf_tables_updchain(struct nft_ctx *ctx, u8 genmask, u8 policy,
struct nft_base_chain *basechain;
struct nft_stats *stats = NULL;
struct nft_chain_hook hook;
- const struct nlattr *name;
struct nf_hook_ops *ops;
struct nft_trans *trans;
int err;
@@ -1645,12 +1644,11 @@ static int nf_tables_updchain(struct nft_ctx *ctx, u8 genmask, u8 policy,
return PTR_ERR(stats);
}
+ err = -ENOMEM;
trans = nft_trans_alloc(ctx, NFT_MSG_NEWCHAIN,
sizeof(struct nft_trans_chain));
- if (trans == NULL) {
- free_percpu(stats);
- return -ENOMEM;
- }
+ if (trans == NULL)
+ goto err;
nft_trans_chain_stats(trans) = stats;
nft_trans_chain_update(trans) = true;
@@ -1660,19 +1658,37 @@ static int nf_tables_updchain(struct nft_ctx *ctx, u8 genmask, u8 policy,
else
nft_trans_chain_policy(trans) = -1;
- name = nla[NFTA_CHAIN_NAME];
- if (nla[NFTA_CHAIN_HANDLE] && name) {
- nft_trans_chain_name(trans) =
- nla_strdup(name, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!nft_trans_chain_name(trans)) {
- kfree(trans);
- free_percpu(stats);
- return -ENOMEM;
+ if (nla[NFTA_CHAIN_HANDLE] &&
+ nla[NFTA_CHAIN_NAME]) {
+ struct nft_trans *tmp;
+ char *name;
+
+ err = -ENOMEM;
+ name = nla_strdup(nla[NFTA_CHAIN_NAME], GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!name)
+ goto err;
+
+ err = -EEXIST;
+ list_for_each_entry(tmp, &ctx->net->nft.commit_list, list) {
+ if (tmp->msg_type == NFT_MSG_NEWCHAIN &&
+ tmp->ctx.table == table &&
+ nft_trans_chain_update(tmp) &&
+ nft_trans_chain_name(tmp) &&
+ strcmp(name, nft_trans_chain_name(tmp)) == 0) {
+ kfree(name);
+ goto err;
+ }
}
+
+ nft_trans_chain_name(trans) = name;
}
list_add_tail(&trans->list, &ctx->net->nft.commit_list);
return 0;
+err:
+ free_percpu(stats);
+ kfree(trans);
+ return err;
}
static int nf_tables_newchain(struct net *net, struct sock *nlsk,
Its possible to rename two chains to the same name in one transaction: nft add chain t c1 nft add chain t c2 nft 'rename chain t c1 c3;rename chain t c2 c3' This creates two chains named 'c3'. Appears to be harmless, both chains can still be deleted both by name or handle, but, nevertheless, its a bug. Walk transaction log and also compare vs. the pending renames. Both chains can still be deleted, but nevertheless it is a bug as we don't allow to create chains with identical names, so we should prevent this from happening-by-rename too. Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> --- net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)