diff mbox series

[fortran] Warn about out-of-bounds access with DO subscripts

Message ID 4f751299-7191-7a49-0bbe-676d194d50a9@netcologne.de
State New
Headers show
Series [fortran] Warn about out-of-bounds access with DO subscripts | expand

Commit Message

Thomas Koenig Sept. 23, 2017, 12:33 p.m. UTC
Hello world,

here is an update and a ping for my patch at

https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-09/msg01104.html

This patch warns unconditionally for

   REAL A(3)
   DO I=1,4
      A(I) = 42.
   END DO

while only warning conditionally, dependent on a new flag,
for when the statement containing the expression is hidden
behind some IF or SELECT CASE statement or if there
is something in the DO loop which could potentially exit the loop,
so

   REAL A(3)
   DO I=1,4
     IF (CONDITON) A(I) = 42.
   END DO

will require the new -Wdo-subscript or the -Wextra flag.

Regression-tested. OK for trunk?

Regards

	Thomas

2017-09-23  Thomas Koenig  <tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org>

         * lang.opt:  Add -Wdo-subscript.
         * frontend-passes.c (do_t): New type.
         (doloop_list): Use variable of do_type.
         (if_level): Variable to track if levels.
         (select_level): Variable to track select levels.
         (gfc_run_passes): Initialize i_level and select_level.
         (doloop_code): Record current level of if + select
         level in doloop_list.  Add seen_goto if there could
         be a branch outside the loop. Use different type for
         doloop_list.
         (doloop_function): Call do_intent and do_subscript; move
         functionality of checking INTENT to do_intent.
         (insert_index_t): New type, for callback_insert_index.
         (callback_insert_index): New function.
         (insert_index): New function.
         (do_subscript): New function.
         (do_intent): New function.
         (gfc_code_walker): Keep track of if_level and select_level.
         * invoke.texi: Document -Wdo-subscript.

2017-09-23  Thomas Koenig  <tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org>

         * gfortran.dg/do_subscript_1.f90: New test.
         * gfortran.dg/do_subscript_2.f90: New test.
         * gfortran.dg/gomp/associate1.f90: Add out of bounds warning.
         * gfortran.dg/predcom-1.f: Adjust loop bounds.
         * gfortran.dg/unconstrained_commons.f: Add out of bounds warning.

Comments

Jerry DeLisle Sept. 25, 2017, 2:30 a.m. UTC | #1
On 09/23/2017 05:33 AM, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> Hello world,
> 
> here is an update and a ping for my patch at
> 
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-09/msg01104.html
> 
> This patch warns unconditionally for
> 
>   REAL A(3)
>   DO I=1,4
>      A(I) = 42.
>   END DO
> 
> while only warning conditionally, dependent on a new flag,
> for when the statement containing the expression is hidden
> behind some IF or SELECT CASE statement or if there
> is something in the DO loop which could potentially exit the loop,
> so
> 
>   REAL A(3)
>   DO I=1,4
>     IF (CONDITON) A(I) = 42.
>   END DO
> 
> will require the new -Wdo-subscript or the -Wextra flag.
> 
> Regression-tested. OK for trunk?
> 
> Regards
> 
>     Thomas

Yes OK,

Jerry
Thomas Koenig Sept. 25, 2017, 4:50 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi Jerry,

> Yes OK,

Thanks for the review, committed as r253156.

Now, on to some other bugs...

Regards

	Thomas
Thomas Schwinge Sept. 26, 2017, 7:17 a.m. UTC | #3
Hi!

On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 18:50:49 +0200, Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> wrote:
> Thanks for the review, committed as r253156.
> 
> Now, on to some other bugs...

No, back to this one please.  ;-)

Apparently, the changes you prepared for existing testcases did not get
committed, so I'm now seeing some FAILs there.  See also recent posts on
the <gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org> mailing list:

    FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/associate1.f90   -O  (test for excess errors)
    FAIL: gfortran.dg/predcom-1.f   -O  (test for excess errors)
    FAIL: gfortran.dg/unconstrained_commons.f   -O  (test for excess errors)

And the following gets highlighted, too:

    FAIL: compiler driver --help=fortran option(s): "^ +-.*[^:.]$" absent from output: "  -Wdo-subscript              Warn about possibly incorrect subscripts in do loops"
    FAIL: compiler driver --help=warnings option(s): "^ +-.*[^:.]$" absent from output: "  -Wdo-subscript              Warn about possibly incorrect subscripts in do loops"


Grüße
 Thomas
Jakub Jelinek Sept. 26, 2017, 11:47 a.m. UTC | #4
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 09:17:40AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 18:50:49 +0200, Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> wrote:
> > Thanks for the review, committed as r253156.
> > 
> > Now, on to some other bugs...
> 
> No, back to this one please.  ;-)
> 
> Apparently, the changes you prepared for existing testcases did not get
> committed, so I'm now seeing some FAILs there.  See also recent posts on
> the <gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org> mailing list:
> 
>     FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/associate1.f90   -O  (test for excess errors)
>     FAIL: gfortran.dg/predcom-1.f   -O  (test for excess errors)
>     FAIL: gfortran.dg/unconstrained_commons.f   -O  (test for excess errors)

At least the gfortran.dg/gomp testcase doesn't seem to be related to OpenMP
at all, it fails also with just:
program associate1
  integer :: v, i, j
  real :: a(3, 3)
  i = 1
  j = 2
  associate(k => v, l => a(i, j), m => a(i, :))
  k = 1
  do i = 1, 10
    k = k + 2
  end do
  end associate
end program

And I don't really see a bug in the testcase...

	Jakub
Thomas Koenig Sept. 26, 2017, 4:51 p.m. UTC | #5
Hi!

> On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 18:50:49 +0200, Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> wrote:
>> Thanks for the review, committed as r253156.
>>
>> Now, on to some other bugs...
> 
> No, back to this one please.  ;-)

OK, if you insist :-)

> Apparently, the changes you prepared for existing testcases did not get
> committed, so I'm now seeing some FAILs there.  See also recent posts on
> the <gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org> mailing list:
> 
>      FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/associate1.f90   -O  (test for excess errors)
>      FAIL: gfortran.dg/predcom-1.f   -O  (test for excess errors)
>      FAIL: gfortran.dg/unconstrained_commons.f   -O  (test for excess errors)

I have committed those changes, so that should be gone.

> And the following gets highlighted, too:
> 
>      FAIL: compiler driver --help=fortran option(s): "^ +-.*[^:.]$" absent from output: "  -Wdo-subscript              Warn about possibly incorrect subscripts in do loops"
>      FAIL: compiler driver --help=warnings option(s): "^ +-.*[^:.]$" absent from output: "  -Wdo-subscript              Warn about possibly incorrect subscripts in do loops"

This I don't understand.  Was there anything wrong with my
change to fortran/lang.opt?

Regards

	Thomas
Thomas Koenig Sept. 26, 2017, 4:53 p.m. UTC | #6
Hi Jakub,

>    associate(k => v, l => a(i, j), m => a(i, :))
> 
> And I don't really see a bug in the testcase...

Hm, I will look at this. Maybe some strange
interaction with associate here...

Regards

	Thomas
Thomas Schwinge Sept. 27, 2017, 8:37 a.m. UTC | #7
Hi!

On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 18:51:52 +0200, Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 18:50:49 +0200, Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> wrote:
> >> Thanks for the review, committed as r253156.
> >>
> >> Now, on to some other bugs...
> > 
> > No, back to this one please.  ;-)
> 
> OK, if you insist :-)

;-)


> > And the following gets highlighted, too:
> > 
> >      FAIL: compiler driver --help=fortran option(s): "^ +-.*[^:.]$" absent from output: "  -Wdo-subscript              Warn about possibly incorrect subscripts in do loops"
> >      FAIL: compiler driver --help=warnings option(s): "^ +-.*[^:.]$" absent from output: "  -Wdo-subscript              Warn about possibly incorrect subscripts in do loops"
> 
> This I don't understand.

Hmm, don't you see that in your test logs?

> Was there anything wrong with my
> change to fortran/lang.opt?

Easy enough to fix, so as obvious, committed to trunk in r253225:

commit a7717725d0bed402378b085bcda8fa3fe337fae9
Author: tschwinge <tschwinge@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4>
Date:   Wed Sep 27 08:35:05 2017 +0000

    Placate gcc.misc-tests/help.exp regarding -Wdo-subscript
    
            gcc/fortran/
            * lang.opt <Wdo-subscript>: End help text with a period.
    
    git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@253225 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
---
 gcc/fortran/ChangeLog | 4 ++++
 gcc/fortran/lang.opt  | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git gcc/fortran/ChangeLog gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
index d0eef84..c698014 100644
--- gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
+++ gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2017-09-27  Thomas Schwinge  <thomas@codesourcery.com>
+
+	* lang.opt <Wdo-subscript>: End help text with a period.
+
 2017-09-26  Thomas Koenig  <tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org>
 
 	* frontend-passes.c (do_subscript): Don't do anything
diff --git gcc/fortran/lang.opt gcc/fortran/lang.opt
index 37ed4a3..88f6af5 100644
--- gcc/fortran/lang.opt
+++ gcc/fortran/lang.opt
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ Warn about most implicit conversions.
 
 Wdo-subscript
 Fortran Var(warn_do_subscript) Warning LangEnabledBy(Fortran,Wextra)
-Warn about possibly incorrect subscripts in do loops
+Warn about possibly incorrect subscripts in do loops.
 
 Wextra
 Fortran Warning


Grüße
 Thomas
diff mbox series

Patch

Index: gcc/fortran/frontend-passes.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/frontend-passes.c	(Revision 253076)
+++ gcc/fortran/frontend-passes.c	(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -39,6 +39,8 @@  static bool optimize_lexical_comparison (gfc_expr
 static void optimize_minmaxloc (gfc_expr **);
 static bool is_empty_string (gfc_expr *e);
 static void doloop_warn (gfc_namespace *);
+static int do_intent (gfc_expr **);
+static int do_subscript (gfc_expr **);
 static void optimize_reduction (gfc_namespace *);
 static int callback_reduction (gfc_expr **, int *, void *);
 static void realloc_strings (gfc_namespace *);
@@ -98,10 +100,20 @@  static int iterator_level;
 
 /* Keep track of DO loop levels.  */
 
-static vec<gfc_code *> doloop_list;
+typedef struct {
+  gfc_code *c;
+  int branch_level;
+  bool seen_goto;
+} do_t;
 
+static vec<do_t> doloop_list;
 static int doloop_level;
 
+/* Keep track of if and select case levels.  */
+
+static int if_level;
+static int select_level;
+
 /* Vector of gfc_expr * to keep track of DO loops.  */
 
 struct my_struct *evec;
@@ -133,6 +145,8 @@  gfc_run_passes (gfc_namespace *ns)
      change.  */
 
   doloop_level = 0;
+  if_level = 0;
+  select_level = 0;
   doloop_warn (ns);
   doloop_list.release ();
   int w, e;
@@ -2231,6 +2245,8 @@  doloop_code (gfc_code **c, int *walk_subtrees ATTR
   gfc_formal_arglist *f;
   gfc_actual_arglist *a;
   gfc_code *cl;
+  do_t loop, *lp;
+  bool seen_goto;
 
   co = *c;
 
@@ -2239,16 +2255,67 @@  doloop_code (gfc_code **c, int *walk_subtrees ATTR
   if ((unsigned) doloop_level < doloop_list.length())
     doloop_list.truncate (doloop_level);
 
+  seen_goto = false;
   switch (co->op)
     {
     case EXEC_DO:
 
       if (co->ext.iterator && co->ext.iterator->var)
-	doloop_list.safe_push (co);
+	loop.c = co;
       else
-	doloop_list.safe_push ((gfc_code *) NULL);
+	loop.c = NULL;
+
+      loop.branch_level = if_level + select_level;
+      loop.seen_goto = false;
+      doloop_list.safe_push (loop);
       break;
 
+      /* If anything could transfer control away from a suspicious
+	 subscript, make sure to set seen_goto in the current DO loop
+	 (if any).  */
+    case EXEC_GOTO:
+    case EXEC_EXIT:
+    case EXEC_STOP:
+    case EXEC_ERROR_STOP:
+    case EXEC_CYCLE:
+      seen_goto = true;
+      break;
+
+    case EXEC_OPEN:
+      if (co->ext.open->err)
+	seen_goto = true;
+      break;
+
+    case EXEC_CLOSE:
+      if (co->ext.close->err)
+	seen_goto = true;
+      break;
+
+    case EXEC_BACKSPACE:
+    case EXEC_ENDFILE:
+    case EXEC_REWIND:
+    case EXEC_FLUSH:
+
+      if (co->ext.filepos->err)
+	seen_goto = true;
+      break;
+
+    case EXEC_INQUIRE:
+      if (co->ext.filepos->err)
+	seen_goto = true;
+      break;
+
+    case EXEC_READ:
+    case EXEC_WRITE:
+      if (co->ext.dt->err || co->ext.dt->end || co->ext.dt->eor)
+	seen_goto = true;
+      break;
+
+    case EXEC_WAIT:
+      if (co->ext.wait->err || co->ext.wait->end || co->ext.wait->eor)
+	loop.seen_goto = true;
+      break;
+
     case EXEC_CALL:
 
       if (co->resolved_sym == NULL)
@@ -2265,9 +2332,10 @@  doloop_code (gfc_code **c, int *walk_subtrees ATTR
 
       while (a && f)
 	{
-	  FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (doloop_list, i, cl)
+	  FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (doloop_list, i, lp)
 	    {
 	      gfc_symbol *do_sym;
+	      cl = lp->c;
 
 	      if (cl == NULL)
 		break;
@@ -2282,14 +2350,14 @@  doloop_code (gfc_code **c, int *walk_subtrees ATTR
 				   "value inside loop  beginning at %L as "
 				   "INTENT(OUT) argument to subroutine %qs",
 				   do_sym->name, &a->expr->where,
-				   &doloop_list[i]->loc,
+				   &(doloop_list[i].c->loc),
 				   co->symtree->n.sym->name);
 		  else if (f->sym->attr.intent == INTENT_INOUT)
 		    gfc_error_now ("Variable %qs at %L not definable inside "
 				   "loop beginning at %L as INTENT(INOUT) "
 				   "argument to subroutine %qs",
 				   do_sym->name, &a->expr->where,
-				   &doloop_list[i]->loc,
+				   &(doloop_list[i].c->loc),
 				   co->symtree->n.sym->name);
 		}
 	    }
@@ -2301,20 +2369,267 @@  doloop_code (gfc_code **c, int *walk_subtrees ATTR
     default:
       break;
     }
+  if (seen_goto && doloop_level > 0)
+    doloop_list[doloop_level-1].seen_goto = true;
+
   return 0;
 }
 
-/* Callback function for functions checking that we do not pass a DO variable
-   to an INTENT(OUT) or INTENT(INOUT) dummy variable.  */
+/* Callback function to warn about different things within DO loops.  */
 
 static int
 do_function (gfc_expr **e, int *walk_subtrees ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
 	     void *data ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
 {
+  do_t *last;
+
+  if (doloop_list.length () == 0)
+    return 0;
+
+  if ((*e)->expr_type == EXPR_FUNCTION)
+    do_intent (e);
+
+  last = &doloop_list.last();
+  if (last->seen_goto && !warn_do_subscript)
+    return 0;
+
+  if ((*e)->expr_type == EXPR_VARIABLE)
+    do_subscript (e);
+
+  return 0;
+}
+
+typedef struct
+{
+  gfc_symbol *sym;
+  mpz_t val;
+} insert_index_t;
+
+/* Callback function - if the expression is the variable in data->sym,
+   replace it with a constant from data->val.  */
+
+static int
+callback_insert_index (gfc_expr **e, int *walk_subtrees ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
+		       void *data)
+{
+  insert_index_t *d;
+  gfc_expr *ex, *n;
+
+  ex = (*e);
+  if (ex->expr_type != EXPR_VARIABLE)
+    return 0;
+
+  d = (insert_index_t *) data;
+  if (ex->symtree->n.sym != d->sym)
+    return 0;
+
+  n = gfc_get_constant_expr (BT_INTEGER, ex->ts.kind, &ex->where);
+  mpz_set (n->value.integer, d->val);
+
+  gfc_free_expr (ex);
+  *e = n;
+  return 0;
+}
+
+/* In the expression e, replace occurrences of the variable sym with
+   val.  If this results in a constant expression, return true and
+   return the value in ret.  Return false if the expression already
+   is a constant.  Caller has to clear ret in that case.  */
+
+static bool
+insert_index (gfc_expr *e, gfc_symbol *sym, mpz_t val, mpz_t ret)
+{
+  gfc_expr *n;
+  insert_index_t data;
+  bool rc;
+
+  if (e->expr_type == EXPR_CONSTANT)
+    return false;
+
+  n = gfc_copy_expr (e);
+  data.sym = sym;
+  mpz_init_set (data.val, val);
+  gfc_expr_walker (&n, callback_insert_index, (void *) &data);
+  gfc_simplify_expr (n, 0);
+
+  if (n->expr_type == EXPR_CONSTANT)
+    {
+      rc = true;
+      mpz_init_set (ret, n->value.integer);
+    }
+  else
+    rc = false;
+
+  mpz_clear (data.val);
+  gfc_free_expr (n);
+  return rc;
+
+}
+
+/* Check array subscripts for possible out-of-bounds accesses in DO
+   loops with constant bounds.  */
+
+static int
+do_subscript (gfc_expr **e)
+{
+  gfc_expr *v;
+  gfc_array_ref *ar;
+  gfc_ref *ref;
+  int i,j;
+  gfc_code *dl;
+  do_t *lp;
+
+  v = *e;
+  /* Constants are already checked.  */
+  if (v->expr_type == EXPR_CONSTANT)
+    return 0;
+
+  for (ref = v->ref; ref; ref = ref->next)
+    {
+      if (ref->type == REF_ARRAY && ref->u.ar.type == AR_ELEMENT)
+	{
+	  ar = & ref->u.ar;
+	  FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (doloop_list, j, lp)
+	    {
+	      gfc_symbol *do_sym;
+	      mpz_t do_start, do_step, do_end;
+	      bool have_do_start, have_do_end;
+	      bool error_not_proven;
+	      int warn;
+
+	      dl = lp->c;
+	      if (dl == NULL)
+		break;
+
+	      /* If we are within a branch, or a goto or equivalent
+		 was seen in the DO loop before, then we cannot prove that
+		 this expression is actually evaluated.  Don't do anything
+		 unless we want to see it all.  */
+	      error_not_proven = lp->seen_goto
+		|| lp->branch_level < if_level + select_level;
+
+	      if (error_not_proven && !warn_do_subscript)
+		break;
+
+	      if (error_not_proven)
+		warn = OPT_Wdo_subscript;
+	      else
+		warn = 0;
+
+	      do_sym = dl->ext.iterator->var->symtree->n.sym;
+	      if (do_sym->ts.type != BT_INTEGER)
+		continue;
+
+	      /* If we do not know about the stepsize, the loop may be zero trip.
+		 Do not warn in this case.  */
+	  
+	      if (dl->ext.iterator->step->expr_type == EXPR_CONSTANT)
+		mpz_init_set (do_step, dl->ext.iterator->step->value.integer);
+	      else
+		continue;
+
+	      if (dl->ext.iterator->start->expr_type == EXPR_CONSTANT)
+		{
+		  have_do_start = true;
+		  mpz_init_set (do_start, dl->ext.iterator->start->value.integer);
+		}
+	      else
+		have_do_start = false;
+
+	  
+	      if (dl->ext.iterator->end->expr_type == EXPR_CONSTANT)
+		{
+		  have_do_end = true;
+		  mpz_init_set (do_end, dl->ext.iterator->end->value.integer);
+		}
+	      else
+		have_do_end = false;
+
+	      if (!have_do_start && !have_do_end)
+		return 0;
+
+	      /* May have to correct the end value if the step does not equal
+		 one.  */
+	      if (have_do_start && have_do_end && mpz_cmp_ui (do_step, 1) != 0)
+		{
+		  mpz_t diff, rem;
+
+		  mpz_init (diff);
+		  mpz_init (rem);
+		  mpz_sub (diff, do_end, do_start);
+		  mpz_tdiv_r (rem, diff, do_step);
+		  mpz_sub (do_end, do_end, rem);
+		  mpz_clear (diff);
+		  mpz_clear (rem);
+		}
+
+	      for (i = 0; i< ar->dimen; i++)
+		{
+		  mpz_t val;
+		  if (ar->dimen_type[i] == DIMEN_ELEMENT && have_do_start
+		      && insert_index (ar->start[i], do_sym, do_start, val))
+		    {
+		      if (ar->as->lower[i]
+			  && ar->as->lower[i]->expr_type == EXPR_CONSTANT
+			  && mpz_cmp (val, ar->as->lower[i]->value.integer) < 0)
+			gfc_warning (warn, "Array reference at %L out of bounds "
+				     "(%ld < %ld) in loop beginning at %L",
+				     &ar->start[i]->where, mpz_get_si (val),
+				     mpz_get_si (ar->as->lower[i]->value.integer),
+				     &doloop_list[j].c->loc);
+
+		      if (ar->as->upper[i]
+			  && ar->as->upper[i]->expr_type == EXPR_CONSTANT
+			  && mpz_cmp (val, ar->as->upper[i]->value.integer) > 0)
+			    gfc_warning (warn, "Array reference at %L out of bounds "
+					 "(%ld > %ld) in loop beginning at %L",
+					 &ar->start[i]->where, mpz_get_si (val),
+					 mpz_get_si (ar->as->upper[i]->value.integer),
+					 &doloop_list[j].c->loc);
+
+		      mpz_clear (val);
+		    }
+
+		  if (ar->dimen_type[i] == DIMEN_ELEMENT && have_do_end
+		      && insert_index (ar->start[i], do_sym, do_end, val))
+		    {
+		      if (ar->as->lower[i]
+			  && ar->as->lower[i]->expr_type == EXPR_CONSTANT
+			  && mpz_cmp (val, ar->as->lower[i]->value.integer) < 0)
+			gfc_warning (warn, "Array reference at %L out of bounds "
+				     "(%ld < %ld) in loop beginning at %L",
+				     &ar->start[i]->where, mpz_get_si (val),
+				     mpz_get_si (ar->as->lower[i]->value.integer),
+				     &doloop_list[j].c->loc);
+
+		      if (ar->as->upper[i]
+			  && ar->as->upper[i]->expr_type == EXPR_CONSTANT
+			  && mpz_cmp (val, ar->as->upper[i]->value.integer) > 0)
+			gfc_warning (warn, "Array reference at %L out of bounds "
+				     "(%ld > %ld) in loop beginning at %L",
+				     &ar->start[i]->where, mpz_get_si (val),
+				     mpz_get_si (ar->as->upper[i]->value.integer),
+				     &doloop_list[j].c->loc);
+
+		      mpz_clear (val);
+		    }
+		}
+	    }
+	}
+    }
+  return 0;
+}
+/* Function for functions checking that we do not pass a DO variable
+   to an INTENT(OUT) or INTENT(INOUT) dummy variable.  */
+
+static int
+do_intent (gfc_expr **e)
+{
   gfc_formal_arglist *f;
   gfc_actual_arglist *a;
   gfc_expr *expr;
   gfc_code *dl;
+  do_t *lp;
   int i;
 
   expr = *e;
@@ -2337,10 +2652,10 @@  do_function (gfc_expr **e, int *walk_subtrees ATTR
 
   while (a && f)
     {
-      FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (doloop_list, i, dl)
+      FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (doloop_list, i, lp)
 	{
 	  gfc_symbol *do_sym;
-
+	  dl = lp->c;
 	  if (dl == NULL)
 	    break;
 
@@ -2353,13 +2668,13 @@  do_function (gfc_expr **e, int *walk_subtrees ATTR
 		gfc_error_now ("Variable %qs at %L set to undefined value "
 			       "inside loop beginning at %L as INTENT(OUT) "
 			       "argument to function %qs", do_sym->name,
-			       &a->expr->where, &doloop_list[i]->loc,
+			       &a->expr->where, &doloop_list[i].c->loc,
 			       expr->symtree->n.sym->name);
 	      else if (f->sym->attr.intent == INTENT_INOUT)
 		gfc_error_now ("Variable %qs at %L not definable inside loop"
 			       " beginning at %L as INTENT(INOUT) argument to"
 			       " function %qs", do_sym->name,
-			       &a->expr->where, &doloop_list[i]->loc,
+			       &a->expr->where, &doloop_list[i].c->loc,
 			       expr->symtree->n.sym->name);
 	    }
 	}
@@ -4055,6 +4370,10 @@  gfc_code_walker (gfc_code **c, walk_code_fn_t code
 	      WALK_SUBEXPR (co->ext.iterator->step);
 	      break;
 
+	    case EXEC_IF:
+	      if_level ++;
+	      break;
+
 	    case EXEC_WHERE:
 	      in_where = true;
 	      break;
@@ -4073,6 +4392,7 @@  gfc_code_walker (gfc_code **c, walk_code_fn_t code
 
 	    case EXEC_SELECT:
 	      WALK_SUBEXPR (co->expr1);
+	      select_level ++;
 	      for (b = co->block; b; b = b->block)
 		{
 		  gfc_case *cp;
@@ -4329,6 +4649,12 @@  gfc_code_walker (gfc_code **c, walk_code_fn_t code
 	  if (co->op == EXEC_DO)
 	    doloop_level --;
 
+	  if (co->op == EXEC_IF)
+	    if_level --;
+
+	  if (co->op == EXEC_SELECT)
+	    select_level --;
+  
 	  in_omp_workshare = saved_in_omp_workshare;
 	  in_where = saved_in_where;
 	}
Index: gcc/fortran/invoke.texi
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/invoke.texi	(Revision 253076)
+++ gcc/fortran/invoke.texi	(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -145,8 +145,8 @@  by type.  Explanations are in the following sectio
 @xref{Error and Warning Options,,Options to request or suppress errors
 and warnings}.
 @gccoptlist{-Waliasing -Wall -Wampersand -Wargument-mismatch -Warray-bounds
--Wc-binding-type -Wcharacter-truncation @gol
--Wconversion -Wfunction-elimination -Wimplicit-interface @gol
+-Wc-binding-type -Wcharacter-truncation -Wconversion @gol
+-Wdo-subscript -Wfunction-elimination -Wimplicit-interface @gol
 -Wimplicit-procedure -Wintrinsic-shadow -Wuse-without-only -Wintrinsics-std @gol
 -Wline-truncation -Wno-align-commons -Wno-tabs -Wreal-q-constant @gol
 -Wsurprising -Wunderflow -Wunused-parameter -Wrealloc-lhs -Wrealloc-lhs-all @gol
@@ -891,8 +891,8 @@  option does @emph{not} imply @option{-Wconversion}
 @cindex extra warnings
 @cindex warnings, extra
 Enables some warning options for usages of language features which
-may be problematic. This currently includes @option{-Wcompare-reals}
-and @option{-Wunused-parameter}.
+may be problematic. This currently includes @option{-Wcompare-reals},
+@option{-Wunused-parameter} and @option{-Wdo-subscript}.
 
 @item -Wimplicit-interface
 @opindex @code{Wimplicit-interface}
@@ -1064,6 +1064,21 @@  target. This option is implied by @option{-Wall}.
 Warn if a @code{DO} loop is known to execute zero times at compile
 time.  This option is implied by @option{-Wall}.
 
+@item -Wdo-subscript
+@opindex @code{Wdo-subscript}
+Warn if an array subscript inside a DO loop could lead to an
+out-of-bounds access even if the compiler can not prove that the
+statement is actually executed, in cases like
+@smallexample
+  real a(3)
+  do i=1,4
+    if (condition(i)) then
+      a(i) = 1.2
+    end if
+  end do
+@end smallexample
+This option is implied by @option{-Wextra}.
+
 @item -Werror
 @opindex @code{Werror}
 @cindex warnings, to errors
Index: gcc/fortran/lang.opt
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/lang.opt	(Revision 253076)
+++ gcc/fortran/lang.opt	(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -237,6 +237,10 @@  Wconversion-extra
 Fortran Var(warn_conversion_extra) Warning
 Warn about most implicit conversions.
 
+Wdo-subscript
+Fortran Var(warn_do_subscript) Warning LangEnabledBy(Fortran,Wextra)
+Warn about possibly incorrect subscripts in do loops
+
 Wextra
 Fortran Warning
 ; Documented in common
Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/gomp/associate1.f90
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/gomp/associate1.f90	(Revision 253076)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/gomp/associate1.f90	(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@  program associate1
   type(dt) :: b(3)
   i = 1
   j = 2
-  associate(k => v, l => a(i, j), m => a(i, :))
+  associate(k => v, l => a(i, j), m => a(i, :)) ! { dg-warning "out of bounds" }
   associate(n => b(j)%c(:, :)%i, o => a, p => b)
 !$omp parallel shared (l)	! { dg-error "ASSOCIATE name" }
 !$omp end parallel
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@  program associate1
   end do
   k = 1
 !$omp simd linear (k : 2)	! { dg-error "ASSOCIATE name" }
-  do i = 1, 10
+  do i = 1, 10 ! { dg-warning "out of bounds" }
     k = k + 2
   end do
   end associate
Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/predcom-1.f
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/predcom-1.f	(Revision 253076)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/predcom-1.f	(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ 
       INTEGER            I
       REAL               ANORM
       INTRINSIC          ABS
-            DO 20 I = 1, N
+            DO 20 I = 2, N
                ANORM = ANORM +ABS( E( I ) )+ ABS( E( I-1 ) )
    20       CONTINUE
       CLANHT = ANORM
Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/unconstrained_commons.f
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/unconstrained_commons.f	(Revision 253076)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/unconstrained_commons.f	(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ 
       IMPLICIT DOUBLE PRECISION (X)
       INTEGER J
       COMMON /MYCOMMON / X(1)
-      DO 10 J=1,1024
-         X(J+1)=X(J+7)
+      DO 10 J=1,1024 ! { dg-warning "out of bounds" }
+         X(J+1)=X(J+7) ! { dg-warning "out of bounds" }
   10  CONTINUE
       RETURN
       END