diff mbox series

[net] bpf/verifier: reject BPF_ALU64|BPF_END

Message ID 8c3d5513-6171-3e68-56df-1efd0e87f071@solarflare.com
State Accepted, archived
Delegated to: David Miller
Headers show
Series [net] bpf/verifier: reject BPF_ALU64|BPF_END | expand

Commit Message

Edward Cree Sept. 15, 2017, 1:37 p.m. UTC
Neither ___bpf_prog_run nor the JITs accept it.
Also adds a new test case.

Fixes: 17a5267067f3 ("bpf: verifier (add verifier core)")
Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c                       |  3 ++-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Alexei Starovoitov Sept. 15, 2017, 3:50 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 02:37:38PM +0100, Edward Cree wrote:
> Neither ___bpf_prog_run nor the JITs accept it.
> Also adds a new test case.
> 
> Fixes: 17a5267067f3 ("bpf: verifier (add verifier core)")
> Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>

Good catch. Thanks!
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Daniel Borkmann Sept. 15, 2017, 6:01 p.m. UTC | #2
On 09/15/2017 03:37 PM, Edward Cree wrote:
> Neither ___bpf_prog_run nor the JITs accept it.
> Also adds a new test case.
>
> Fixes: 17a5267067f3 ("bpf: verifier (add verifier core)")
> Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>

Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
David Miller Sept. 15, 2017, 10:02 p.m. UTC | #3
From: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 14:37:38 +0100

> Neither ___bpf_prog_run nor the JITs accept it.
> Also adds a new test case.
> 
> Fixes: 17a5267067f3 ("bpf: verifier (add verifier core)")
> Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>

Applied and queued up for -stable.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 477b693..799b245 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -2292,7 +2292,8 @@  static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
 			}
 		} else {
 			if (insn->src_reg != BPF_REG_0 || insn->off != 0 ||
-			    (insn->imm != 16 && insn->imm != 32 && insn->imm != 64)) {
+			    (insn->imm != 16 && insn->imm != 32 && insn->imm != 64) ||
+			    BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64) {
 				verbose("BPF_END uses reserved fields\n");
 				return -EINVAL;
 			}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 8eb0995..26f3250 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -6629,6 +6629,22 @@  static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 		.result = REJECT,
 		.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
 	},
+	{
+		"invalid 64-bit BPF_END",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+			{
+				.code  = BPF_ALU64 | BPF_END | BPF_TO_LE,
+				.dst_reg = BPF_REG_0,
+				.src_reg = 0,
+				.off   = 0,
+				.imm   = 32,
+			},
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.errstr = "BPF_END uses reserved fields",
+		.result = REJECT,
+	},
 };
 
 static int probe_filter_length(const struct bpf_insn *fp)