[ovs-dev,branch-2.7,1/2] Set release date for 2.7.1.
diff mbox

Message ID 1498668440-38487-1-git-send-email-jpettit@ovn.org
State Accepted
Headers show

Commit Message

Justin Pettit June 28, 2017, 4:47 p.m. UTC
Signed-off-by: Justin Pettit <jpettit@ovn.org>
---
 NEWS             |  3 ++-
 configure.ac     |  2 +-
 debian/changelog | 12 ++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Flavio Leitner June 28, 2017, 6:43 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 09:47:19AM -0700, Justin Pettit wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Justin Pettit <jpettit@ovn.org>
> ---

Acked-by: Flavio Leitner <fbl@sysclose.org>
Thanks,

fbl
Justin Pettit July 1, 2017, 11:34 p.m. UTC | #2
> On Jun 28, 2017, at 11:43 AM, Flavio Leitner <fbl@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 09:47:19AM -0700, Justin Pettit wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Justin Pettit <jpettit@ovn.org>
>> ---
> 
> Acked-by: Flavio Leitner <fbl@sysclose.org>
> Thanks,

Thanks, Flavio.  I'd been hoping to get reviews on the couple of minor bug fixes I'd sent out around the same time as this patch.  Now with the July Fourth long weekend in the US, I figure I'll just wait until Wednesday, get my acks or nacks and release then.

I've captured your acks on these patches, though.  Thanks again!

--Justin
Stokes, Ian July 3, 2017, 10:22 a.m. UTC | #3
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ovs-dev-bounces@openvswitch.org [mailto:ovs-dev-
> bounces@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Justin Pettit
> Sent: Sunday, July 2, 2017 12:35 AM
> To: Flavio Leitner <fbl@redhat.com>
> Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [branch-2.7 1/2] Set release date for 2.7.1.
> 
> 
> > On Jun 28, 2017, at 11:43 AM, Flavio Leitner <fbl@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 09:47:19AM -0700, Justin Pettit wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Justin Pettit <jpettit@ovn.org>
> >> ---
> >
> > Acked-by: Flavio Leitner <fbl@sysclose.org> Thanks,
> 
> Thanks, Flavio.  I'd been hoping to get reviews on the couple of minor bug
> fixes I'd sent out around the same time as this patch.  Now with the July
> Fourth long weekend in the US, I figure I'll just wait until Wednesday,
> get my acks or nacks and release then.
> 
> I've captured your acks on these patches, though.  Thanks again!
> 
> --Justin

Hi Justin,

I have a small documentation and travis patch that I would like to see get into 2.7.1.

https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/778288/

It just updates the docs and travis to point to DPDK 16.11.2 instead of 16.11.1, it's quite minimal.

Would it be possible to have this as part of the 2.7.1 branch?

Ian
Flavio Leitner July 3, 2017, 2:56 p.m. UTC | #4
On Sat, Jul 01, 2017 at 04:34:34PM -0700, Justin Pettit wrote:
> 
> > On Jun 28, 2017, at 11:43 AM, Flavio Leitner <fbl@redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 09:47:19AM -0700, Justin Pettit wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Justin Pettit <jpettit@ovn.org>
> >> ---
> > 
> > Acked-by: Flavio Leitner <fbl@sysclose.org>
> > Thanks,
> 
> Thanks, Flavio.  I'd been hoping to get reviews on the couple of minor bug fixes I'd sent out around the same time as this patch.  Now with the July Fourth long weekend in the US, I figure I'll just wait until Wednesday, get my acks or nacks and release then.
> 
> I've captured your acks on these patches, though.  Thanks again!

That's fine. We have some upstream projects waiting for the 2.7.1 release,
so please don't delay too much.

Speaking of pending fixes, we also need to figure out what to do with
commit d3b8f5052292b3ba9084ffed097e90b87f2950f5 because it may introduce
new issues as already reported in the ML.
Justin Pettit July 3, 2017, 7:54 p.m. UTC | #5
> On Jul 3, 2017, at 3:22 AM, Stokes, Ian <ian.stokes@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> I have a small documentation and travis patch that I would like to see get into 2.7.1.
> 
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/778288/
> 
> It just updates the docs and travis to point to DPDK 16.11.2 instead of 16.11.1, it's quite minimal.
> 
> Would it be possible to have this as part of the 2.7.1 branch?

Does this cause any sort of upgrade issues for people going from 2.7.0 to 2.7.1?  I wouldn't normally expect to see that in a bug fix release, but I don't know how the DPDK dependencies work.  I don't feel confident enough to review the patch.  If you can get an acked-by and don't think it will cause any problems, I'll get it merged.

Thanks,

--Justin
Stokes, Ian July 3, 2017, 7:58 p.m. UTC | #6
> > On Jul 3, 2017, at 3:22 AM, Stokes, Ian <ian.stokes@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > I have a small documentation and travis patch that I would like to see
> get into 2.7.1.
> >
> > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/778288/
> >
> > It just updates the docs and travis to point to DPDK 16.11.2 instead of
> 16.11.1, it's quite minimal.
> >
> > Would it be possible to have this as part of the 2.7.1 branch?
> 
> Does this cause any sort of upgrade issues for people going from 2.7.0 to
> 2.7.1?  I wouldn't normally expect to see that in a bug fix release, but I
> don't know how the DPDK dependencies work.  I don't feel confident enough
> to review the patch.  If you can get an acked-by and don't think it will
> cause any problems, I'll get it merged.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> --Justin
Hi Justin,

DPDK upgrades such as 16.11.1 to 16.11.2 consist of bug fixes only in DPDK, no api/abi changes so DPDK will work as before for OVS. I'll put a request for review to see if we can get this in as it is the latest DPDK we'd like to point customers to.

Thanks
Ian
Justin Pettit July 3, 2017, 8:09 p.m. UTC | #7
> On Jul 3, 2017, at 12:58 PM, Stokes, Ian <ian.stokes@intel.com> wrote:
> 
>>> On Jul 3, 2017, at 3:22 AM, Stokes, Ian <ian.stokes@intel.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I have a small documentation and travis patch that I would like to see
>> get into 2.7.1.
>>> 
>>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/778288/
>>> 
>>> It just updates the docs and travis to point to DPDK 16.11.2 instead of
>> 16.11.1, it's quite minimal.
>>> 
>>> Would it be possible to have this as part of the 2.7.1 branch?
>> 
>> Does this cause any sort of upgrade issues for people going from 2.7.0 to
>> 2.7.1?  I wouldn't normally expect to see that in a bug fix release, but I
>> don't know how the DPDK dependencies work.  I don't feel confident enough
>> to review the patch.  If you can get an acked-by and don't think it will
>> cause any problems, I'll get it merged.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> --Justin
> Hi Justin,
> 
> DPDK upgrades such as 16.11.1 to 16.11.2 consist of bug fixes only in DPDK, no api/abi changes so DPDK will work as before for OVS. I'll put a request for review to see if we can get this in as it is the latest DPDK we'd like to point customers to.

Great.  If it all possible, can you have the acked-by cc me so that I don't forget.

Thanks,

--Justin
Justin Pettit July 3, 2017, 8:12 p.m. UTC | #8
> On Jul 3, 2017, at 7:56 AM, Flavio Leitner <fbl@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Jul 01, 2017 at 04:34:34PM -0700, Justin Pettit wrote:
>> 
>>> On Jun 28, 2017, at 11:43 AM, Flavio Leitner <fbl@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 09:47:19AM -0700, Justin Pettit wrote:
>>>> Signed-off-by: Justin Pettit <jpettit@ovn.org>
>>>> ---
>>> 
>>> Acked-by: Flavio Leitner <fbl@sysclose.org>
>>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Thanks, Flavio.  I'd been hoping to get reviews on the couple of minor bug fixes I'd sent out around the same time as this patch.  Now with the July Fourth long weekend in the US, I figure I'll just wait until Wednesday, get my acks or nacks and release then.
>> 
>> I've captured your acks on these patches, though.  Thanks again!
> 
> That's fine. We have some upstream projects waiting for the 2.7.1 release,
> so please don't delay too much.

Okay.  My plan is to do the release on Wednesday.

> Speaking of pending fixes, we also need to figure out what to do with
> commit d3b8f5052292b3ba9084ffed097e90b87f2950f5 because it may introduce
> new issues as already reported in the ML.

Ben's on vacation and will be back on Wednesday.  He's commented on this issue, too, so let's see if he has more thoughts once he gets back.  Hopefully we can address it on Wednesday before the release.

--Justin

Patch
diff mbox

diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
index bbff66af3735..5ed122ae77e7 100644
--- a/NEWS
+++ b/NEWS
@@ -1,10 +1,11 @@ 
-v2.7.1 - xx xxx xxxx
+v2.7.1 - 28 Jun 2017
 ---------------------
    - Fedora Packaging:
      * OVN services are no longer restarted automatically after upgrade.
    - Add --cleanup option to command 'ovs-appctl exit' (see ovs-vswitchd(8)).
    - libopenvswitch-2 was renamed to libopenvswitch-2.7. Applications built
      against libopenvswitch must be recompiled against the newer library.
+   - Bug fixes
 
 v2.7.0 - 21 Feb 2017
 ---------------------
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index c4aa356a4190..c0ff690f451e 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ 
 # limitations under the License.
 
 AC_PREREQ(2.63)
-AC_INIT(openvswitch, 2.7.0, bugs@openvswitch.org)
+AC_INIT(openvswitch, 2.7.1, bugs@openvswitch.org)
 AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR([datapath/datapath.c])
 AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR([m4])
 AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR([build-aux])
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 680766702cff..c537122fae1a 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@ 
+openvswitch (2.7.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
+   [ Open vSwitch team ]
+   * New upstream version
+   - Fedora Packaging:
+     * OVN services are no longer restarted automatically after upgrade.
+   - Add --cleanup option to command 'ovs-appctl exit' (see ovs-vswitchd(8)).
+   - libopenvswitch-2 was renamed to libopenvswitch-2.7. Applications built
+     against libopenvswitch must be recompiled against the newer library.
+   - Bug fixes
+
+ -- Open vSwitch team <dev@openvswitch.org>  Wed, 28 Jun 2017 09:40:42 -0700
+
 openvswitch (2.7.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
    [ Open vSwitch team ]
    * New upstream version