@@ -1275,7 +1275,14 @@ static int bq24190_hw_init(struct bq24190_dev_info *bdi)
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
- if (v != bdi->model) {
+ switch (v) {
+ case BQ24190_REG_VPRS_PN_24190:
+ case BQ24190_REG_VPRS_PN_24192:
+ case BQ24190_REG_VPRS_PN_24192I:
+ bdi->model = v;
+ break;
+ default:
+ dev_err(bdi->dev, "Error unknown model: 0x%02x\n", v);
ret = -ENODEV;
goto out;
}
@@ -1316,7 +1323,6 @@ static int bq24190_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
bdi->client = client;
bdi->dev = dev;
- bdi->model = id->driver_data;
bdi->pdata = client->dev.platform_data;
strncpy(bdi->model_name, id->name, I2C_NAME_SIZE);
mutex_init(&bdi->f_reg_lock);
@@ -1450,6 +1456,8 @@ static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(bq24190_pm_ops, bq24190_pm_suspend, bq24190_pm_resume);
*/
static const struct i2c_device_id bq24190_i2c_ids[] = {
{ "bq24190", BQ24190_REG_VPRS_PN_24190 },
+ { "bq24192", BQ24190_REG_VPRS_PN_24192 },
+ { "bq24192i", BQ24190_REG_VPRS_PN_24192I },
{ },
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, bq24190_i2c_ids);
The bq24192 and bq24192i are mostly identical to the bq24190, TI even published a single datasheet for all 3 of them. The difference between the bq24190 and bq24192[i] is the way charger-type detection is done, the bq24190 is to be directly connected to the USB a/b lines, where as the the bq24192[i] has a gpio which should be driven high/low externally depending on the type of charger connected, from a register level access pov there is no difference. The differences between the bq24192 and bq24192i are: 1) Lower default charge rate on the bq24192i 2) Pre-charge-current can be max 640 mA on the bq24192i Since we do not provide an API for setting the pre-charge-current, these differences can be ignored and we can simply use the existing code as-is with the bq24192 and bq24192i. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> --- drivers/power/supply/bq24190_charger.c | 12 ++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)