diff mbox

[ovs-dev,RFC] openvswitch: use percpu flow stats

Message ID 1471636046-9246-1-git-send-email-cascardo@redhat.com
State Not Applicable
Headers show

Commit Message

Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo Aug. 19, 2016, 7:47 p.m. UTC
Instead of using flow stats per NUMA node, use it per CPU. When using
megaflows, the stats lock can be a bottleneck in scalability.

On a E5-2690 12-core system, usual throughput went from ~4Mpps to ~15Mpps
when forwarding between two 40GbE ports with a single flow configured on
the datapath.
---
 net/openvswitch/flow.c       | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 net/openvswitch/flow.h       |  4 ++--
 net/openvswitch/flow_table.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

Comments

Eric Dumazet Aug. 19, 2016, 7:56 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 16:47 -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> Instead of using flow stats per NUMA node, use it per CPU. When using
> megaflows, the stats lock can be a bottleneck in scalability.

...

>  
>  	flow_cache = kmem_cache_create("sw_flow", sizeof(struct sw_flow)
> -				       + (nr_node_ids
> +				       + (num_possible_cpus()
>  					  * sizeof(struct flow_stats *)),
>  				       0, 0, NULL);
>  	if (flow_cache == NULL)

This is bogus.

Please use nr_cpu_ids instead of num_possible_cpus().
David Miller Aug. 20, 2016, 1:09 a.m. UTC | #2
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 12:56:56 -0700

> On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 16:47 -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
>> Instead of using flow stats per NUMA node, use it per CPU. When using
>> megaflows, the stats lock can be a bottleneck in scalability.
> 
> ...
> 
>>  
>>  	flow_cache = kmem_cache_create("sw_flow", sizeof(struct sw_flow)
>> -				       + (nr_node_ids
>> +				       + (num_possible_cpus()
>>  					  * sizeof(struct flow_stats *)),
>>  				       0, 0, NULL);
>>  	if (flow_cache == NULL)
> 
> This is bogus.
> 
> Please use nr_cpu_ids instead of num_possible_cpus().

Then how would hot-plugged cpus be handled properly?

The only other way is you'd have to free all objects in the current
flow_cache, destroy it, then make a new kmem_cache and reallocate
all of the existing objects and hook them back up every time a cpu
up event occurs.

That doesn't make any sense at all.

Therefore, the size of the objects coming out of "sw_flow" have
to accomodate all possible cpu indexes.
Eric Dumazet Aug. 20, 2016, 4:07 a.m. UTC | #3
On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 18:09 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 12:56:56 -0700
> 
> > On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 16:47 -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> >> Instead of using flow stats per NUMA node, use it per CPU. When using
> >> megaflows, the stats lock can be a bottleneck in scalability.
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> >>  
> >>  	flow_cache = kmem_cache_create("sw_flow", sizeof(struct sw_flow)
> >> -				       + (nr_node_ids
> >> +				       + (num_possible_cpus()
> >>  					  * sizeof(struct flow_stats *)),
> >>  				       0, 0, NULL);
> >>  	if (flow_cache == NULL)
> > 
> > This is bogus.
> > 
> > Please use nr_cpu_ids instead of num_possible_cpus().
> 
> Then how would hot-plugged cpus be handled properly?
> 
> The only other way is you'd have to free all objects in the current
> flow_cache, destroy it, then make a new kmem_cache and reallocate
> all of the existing objects and hook them back up every time a cpu
> up event occurs.
> 
> That doesn't make any sense at all.
> 
> Therefore, the size of the objects coming out of "sw_flow" have
> to accomodate all possible cpu indexes.

Here is an example of a system I had in the past.

8 cpus  (num_possible_cpus() returns 8)

Cpus were numbered : 0, 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 10, 11  : (nr_cpu_ids = 12)

I am pretty sure they are still alive.

Since you want an array indexed by cpu numbers, you need to size it by
nr_cpu_ids, otherwise array[11] will crash / access garbage.

This is why you find many nr_cpu_ids in the linux tree, not
num_possible_cpus() to size arrays.

# git grep -n nr_cpu_ids -- net
net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c:900:                    vmalloc(nr_cpu_ids * sizeof(*(newinfo->chainstack)));
net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c:1132:   countersize = COUNTER_OFFSET(tmp.nentries) * nr_cpu_ids;
net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c:1185:   countersize = COUNTER_OFFSET(repl->nentries) * nr_cpu_ids;
net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c:2200:   countersize = COUNTER_OFFSET(tmp.nentries) * nr_cpu_ids;
net/core/dev.c:3483:    if (next_cpu < nr_cpu_ids) {
net/core/dev.c:3588:             *   - Current CPU is unset (>= nr_cpu_ids).
net/core/dev.c:3596:                (tcpu >= nr_cpu_ids || !cpu_online(tcpu) ||
net/core/dev.c:3603:            if (tcpu < nr_cpu_ids && cpu_online(tcpu)) {
net/core/dev.c:3651:            if (rflow->filter == filter_id && cpu < nr_cpu_ids &&
net/core/neighbour.c:2737:      for (cpu = *pos-1; cpu < nr_cpu_ids; ++cpu) {
net/core/neighbour.c:2751:      for (cpu = *pos; cpu < nr_cpu_ids; ++cpu) {
net/core/net-procfs.c:122:      while (*pos < nr_cpu_ids)
net/core/sysctl_net_core.c:70:                          rps_cpu_mask = roundup_pow_of_two(nr_cpu_ids) - 1;
net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv4_compat.c:360:      for (cpu = *pos-1; cpu < nr_cpu_ids; ++cpu) {
net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv4_compat.c:375:      for (cpu = *pos; cpu < nr_cpu_ids; ++cpu) {
net/ipv4/route.c:254:   for (cpu = *pos-1; cpu < nr_cpu_ids; ++cpu) {
net/ipv4/route.c:267:   for (cpu = *pos; cpu < nr_cpu_ids; ++cpu) {
net/ipv6/icmp.c:918:            kzalloc(nr_cpu_ids * sizeof(struct sock *), GFP_KERNEL);
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c:1265:      for (cpu = cb->args[0]; cpu < nr_cpu_ids; cpu++) {
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c:2003:      if (cb->args[0] == nr_cpu_ids)
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c:2006:      for (cpu = cb->args[0]; cpu < nr_cpu_ids; cpu++) {
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c:3211:      if (cb->args[0] == nr_cpu_ids)
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c:3214:      for (cpu = cb->args[0]; cpu < nr_cpu_ids; cpu++) {
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c:309:    for (cpu = *pos-1; cpu < nr_cpu_ids; ++cpu) {
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c:324:    for (cpu = *pos; cpu < nr_cpu_ids; ++cpu) {
net/netfilter/nf_synproxy_core.c:255:   for (cpu = *pos - 1; cpu < nr_cpu_ids; cpu++) {
net/netfilter/nf_synproxy_core.c:270:   for (cpu = *pos; cpu < nr_cpu_ids; cpu++) {
net/netfilter/x_tables.c:1064:  size = sizeof(void **) * nr_cpu_ids;
net/sunrpc/svc.c:167:   unsigned int maxpools = nr_cpu_ids;
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/net/openvswitch/flow.c b/net/openvswitch/flow.c
index 0ea128e..90ae248 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/flow.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/flow.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ 
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/in.h>
 #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
+#include <linux/cpumask.h>
 #include <linux/if_arp.h>
 #include <linux/ip.h>
 #include <linux/ipv6.h>
@@ -72,32 +73,33 @@  void ovs_flow_stats_update(struct sw_flow *flow, __be16 tcp_flags,
 {
 	struct flow_stats *stats;
 	int node = numa_node_id();
+	int cpu = get_cpu();
 	int len = skb->len + (skb_vlan_tag_present(skb) ? VLAN_HLEN : 0);
 
-	stats = rcu_dereference(flow->stats[node]);
+	stats = rcu_dereference(flow->stats[cpu]);
 
-	/* Check if already have node-specific stats. */
+	/* Check if already have CPU-specific stats. */
 	if (likely(stats)) {
 		spin_lock(&stats->lock);
 		/* Mark if we write on the pre-allocated stats. */
-		if (node == 0 && unlikely(flow->stats_last_writer != node))
-			flow->stats_last_writer = node;
+		if (cpu == 0 && unlikely(flow->stats_last_writer != cpu))
+			flow->stats_last_writer = cpu;
 	} else {
 		stats = rcu_dereference(flow->stats[0]); /* Pre-allocated. */
 		spin_lock(&stats->lock);
 
-		/* If the current NUMA-node is the only writer on the
+		/* If the current CPU is the only writer on the
 		 * pre-allocated stats keep using them.
 		 */
-		if (unlikely(flow->stats_last_writer != node)) {
+		if (unlikely(flow->stats_last_writer != cpu)) {
 			/* A previous locker may have already allocated the
-			 * stats, so we need to check again.  If node-specific
+			 * stats, so we need to check again.  If CPU-specific
 			 * stats were already allocated, we update the pre-
 			 * allocated stats as we have already locked them.
 			 */
-			if (likely(flow->stats_last_writer != NUMA_NO_NODE)
-			    && likely(!rcu_access_pointer(flow->stats[node]))) {
-				/* Try to allocate node-specific stats. */
+			if (likely(flow->stats_last_writer != -1)
+			    && likely(!rcu_access_pointer(flow->stats[cpu]))) {
+				/* Try to allocate CPU-specific stats. */
 				struct flow_stats *new_stats;
 
 				new_stats =
@@ -114,12 +116,12 @@  void ovs_flow_stats_update(struct sw_flow *flow, __be16 tcp_flags,
 					new_stats->tcp_flags = tcp_flags;
 					spin_lock_init(&new_stats->lock);
 
-					rcu_assign_pointer(flow->stats[node],
+					rcu_assign_pointer(flow->stats[cpu],
 							   new_stats);
 					goto unlock;
 				}
 			}
-			flow->stats_last_writer = node;
+			flow->stats_last_writer = cpu;
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -129,6 +131,7 @@  void ovs_flow_stats_update(struct sw_flow *flow, __be16 tcp_flags,
 	stats->tcp_flags |= tcp_flags;
 unlock:
 	spin_unlock(&stats->lock);
+	put_cpu();
 }
 
 /* Must be called with rcu_read_lock or ovs_mutex. */
@@ -136,14 +139,14 @@  void ovs_flow_stats_get(const struct sw_flow *flow,
 			struct ovs_flow_stats *ovs_stats,
 			unsigned long *used, __be16 *tcp_flags)
 {
-	int node;
+	int cpu;
 
 	*used = 0;
 	*tcp_flags = 0;
 	memset(ovs_stats, 0, sizeof(*ovs_stats));
 
-	for_each_node(node) {
-		struct flow_stats *stats = rcu_dereference_ovsl(flow->stats[node]);
+	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+		struct flow_stats *stats = rcu_dereference_ovsl(flow->stats[cpu]);
 
 		if (stats) {
 			/* Local CPU may write on non-local stats, so we must
@@ -163,10 +166,10 @@  void ovs_flow_stats_get(const struct sw_flow *flow,
 /* Called with ovs_mutex. */
 void ovs_flow_stats_clear(struct sw_flow *flow)
 {
-	int node;
+	int cpu;
 
-	for_each_node(node) {
-		struct flow_stats *stats = ovsl_dereference(flow->stats[node]);
+	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+		struct flow_stats *stats = ovsl_dereference(flow->stats[cpu]);
 
 		if (stats) {
 			spin_lock_bh(&stats->lock);
diff --git a/net/openvswitch/flow.h b/net/openvswitch/flow.h
index 03378e7..7725ffc 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/flow.h
+++ b/net/openvswitch/flow.h
@@ -172,14 +172,14 @@  struct sw_flow {
 		struct hlist_node node[2];
 		u32 hash;
 	} flow_table, ufid_table;
-	int stats_last_writer;		/* NUMA-node id of the last writer on
+	int stats_last_writer;		/* CPU id of the last writer on
 					 * 'stats[0]'.
 					 */
 	struct sw_flow_key key;
 	struct sw_flow_id id;
 	struct sw_flow_mask *mask;
 	struct sw_flow_actions __rcu *sf_acts;
-	struct flow_stats __rcu *stats[]; /* One for each NUMA node.  First one
+	struct flow_stats __rcu *stats[]; /* One for each CPU.  First one
 					   * is allocated at flow creation time,
 					   * the rest are allocated on demand
 					   * while holding the 'stats[0].lock'.
diff --git a/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c b/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
index d073fff..6c2ed41 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ 
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/in.h>
 #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
+#include <linux/cpumask.h>
 #include <linux/if_arp.h>
 #include <linux/ip.h>
 #include <linux/ipv6.h>
@@ -79,7 +80,7 @@  struct sw_flow *ovs_flow_alloc(void)
 {
 	struct sw_flow *flow;
 	struct flow_stats *stats;
-	int node;
+	int cpu;
 
 	flow = kmem_cache_alloc(flow_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!flow)
@@ -89,7 +90,7 @@  struct sw_flow *ovs_flow_alloc(void)
 	flow->mask = NULL;
 	flow->id.unmasked_key = NULL;
 	flow->id.ufid_len = 0;
-	flow->stats_last_writer = NUMA_NO_NODE;
+	flow->stats_last_writer = -1;
 
 	/* Initialize the default stat node. */
 	stats = kmem_cache_alloc_node(flow_stats_cache,
@@ -102,9 +103,9 @@  struct sw_flow *ovs_flow_alloc(void)
 
 	RCU_INIT_POINTER(flow->stats[0], stats);
 
-	for_each_node(node)
-		if (node != 0)
-			RCU_INIT_POINTER(flow->stats[node], NULL);
+	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
+		if (cpu != 0)
+			RCU_INIT_POINTER(flow->stats[cpu], NULL);
 
 	return flow;
 err:
@@ -142,16 +143,16 @@  static struct flex_array *alloc_buckets(unsigned int n_buckets)
 
 static void flow_free(struct sw_flow *flow)
 {
-	int node;
+	int cpu;
 
 	if (ovs_identifier_is_key(&flow->id))
 		kfree(flow->id.unmasked_key);
 	if (flow->sf_acts)
 		ovs_nla_free_flow_actions((struct sw_flow_actions __force *)flow->sf_acts);
-	for_each_node(node)
-		if (flow->stats[node])
+	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
+		if (flow->stats[cpu])
 			kmem_cache_free(flow_stats_cache,
-					(struct flow_stats __force *)flow->stats[node]);
+					(struct flow_stats __force *)flow->stats[cpu]);
 	kmem_cache_free(flow_cache, flow);
 }
 
@@ -756,7 +757,7 @@  int ovs_flow_init(void)
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct sw_flow_key) % sizeof(long));
 
 	flow_cache = kmem_cache_create("sw_flow", sizeof(struct sw_flow)
-				       + (nr_node_ids
+				       + (num_possible_cpus()
 					  * sizeof(struct flow_stats *)),
 				       0, 0, NULL);
 	if (flow_cache == NULL)