diff mbox series

[v15,4/9] namei: LOOKUP_BENEATH: O_BENEATH-like scoped resolution

Message ID 20191105090553.6350-5-cyphar@cyphar.com
State Not Applicable
Delegated to: David Miller
Headers show
Series open: introduce openat2(2) syscall | expand

Commit Message

Aleksa Sarai Nov. 5, 2019, 9:05 a.m. UTC 
/* Background. */
There are many circumstances when userspace wants to resolve a path and
ensure that it doesn't go outside of a particular root directory during
resolution. Obvious examples include archive extraction tools, as well as
other security-conscious userspace programs. FreeBSD spun out O_BENEATH
from their Capsicum project[1,2], so it also seems reasonable to
implement similar functionality for Linux.

This is part of a refresh of Al's AT_NO_JUMPS patchset[3] (which was a
variation on David Drysdale's O_BENEATH patchset[4], which in turn was
based on the Capsicum project[5]).

/* Userspace API. */
LOOKUP_BENEATH will be exposed to userspace through openat2(2).

/* Semantics. */
Unlike most other LOOKUP flags (most notably LOOKUP_FOLLOW),
LOOKUP_BENEATH applies to all components of the path.

With LOOKUP_BENEATH, any path component which attempts to "escape" the
starting point of the filesystem lookup (the dirfd passed to openat)
will yield -EXDEV. Thus, all absolute paths and symlinks are disallowed.

Due to a security concern brought up by Jann[6], any ".." path
components are also blocked. This restriction will be lifted in a future
patch, but requires more work to ensure that permitting ".." is done
safely.

Magic-link jumps are also blocked, because they can beam the path lookup
across the starting point. It would be possible to detect and block
only the "bad" crossings with path_is_under() checks, but it's unclear
whether it makes sense to permit magic-links at all. However, userspace
is recommended to pass LOOKUP_NO_MAGICLINKS if they want to ensure that
magic-link crossing is entirely disabled.

/* Testing. */
LOOKUP_BENEATH is tested as part of the openat2(2) selftests.

[1]: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2808
[2]: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17547
[3]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20170429220414.GT29622@ZenIV.linux.org.uk/
[4]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1415094884-18349-1-git-send-email-drysdale@google.com/
[5]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1404124096-21445-1-git-send-email-drysdale@google.com/
[6]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAG48ez1jzNvxB+bfOBnERFGp=oMM0vHWuLD6EULmne3R6xa53w@mail.gmail.com/

Cc: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Suggested-by: David Drysdale <drysdale@google.com>
Suggested-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
---
 fs/namei.c            | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 include/linux/namei.h |  4 ++
 2 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

Comments

Al Viro Nov. 13, 2019, 1:55 a.m. UTC | #1 
On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 08:05:48PM +1100, Aleksa Sarai wrote:

Minor nit here - I'd split "move the conditional call of set_root()
into nd_jump_root()" into a separate patch before that one.  Makes
for fewer distractions in this one.  I'd probably fold "and be
ready for errors other than -ECHILD" into the same preliminary
patch.

> +			/* Not currently safe for scoped-lookups. */
> +			if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_IS_SCOPED))
> +				return ERR_PTR(-EXDEV);

Also a candidate for doing in nd_jump_link()...

> @@ -1373,8 +1403,11 @@ static int follow_dotdot_rcu(struct nameidata *nd)
>  	struct inode *inode = nd->inode;
>  
>  	while (1) {
> -		if (path_equal(&nd->path, &nd->root))
> +		if (path_equal(&nd->path, &nd->root)) {
> +			if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_BENEATH))
> +				return -EXDEV;

Umm...  Are you sure it's not -ECHILD?
Aleksa Sarai Nov. 13, 2019, 7:47 a.m. UTC | #2 
On 2019-11-13, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> Minor nit here - I'd split "move the conditional call of set_root()
> into nd_jump_root()" into a separate patch before that one.  Makes
> for fewer distractions in this one.  I'd probably fold "and be
> ready for errors other than -ECHILD" into the same preliminary
> patch.

Will do.

> > +			/* Not currently safe for scoped-lookups. */
> > +			if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_IS_SCOPED))
> > +				return ERR_PTR(-EXDEV);
> 
> Also a candidate for doing in nd_jump_link()...
> 
> > @@ -1373,8 +1403,11 @@ static int follow_dotdot_rcu(struct nameidata *nd)
> >  	struct inode *inode = nd->inode;
> >  
> >  	while (1) {
> > -		if (path_equal(&nd->path, &nd->root))
> > +		if (path_equal(&nd->path, &nd->root)) {
> > +			if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_BENEATH))
> > +				return -EXDEV;
> 
> Umm...  Are you sure it's not -ECHILD?

It wouldn't hurt to be -ECHILD -- though it's not clear to me how likely
a success would be in REF-walk if the parent components didn't already
trigger an unlazy_walk() in RCU-walk.

I guess that also means LOOKUP_NO_XDEV should trigger -ECHILD in
follow_dotdot_rcu()?
Aleksa Sarai Nov. 14, 2019, 4:57 a.m. UTC | #3 
On 2019-11-13, Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com> wrote:
> On 2019-11-13, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > Minor nit here - I'd split "move the conditional call of set_root()
> > into nd_jump_root()" into a separate patch before that one.  Makes
> > for fewer distractions in this one.  I'd probably fold "and be
> > ready for errors other than -ECHILD" into the same preliminary
> > patch.
> 
> Will do.
> 
> > > +			/* Not currently safe for scoped-lookups. */
> > > +			if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_IS_SCOPED))
> > > +				return ERR_PTR(-EXDEV);
> > 
> > Also a candidate for doing in nd_jump_link()...
> > 
> > > @@ -1373,8 +1403,11 @@ static int follow_dotdot_rcu(struct nameidata *nd)
> > >  	struct inode *inode = nd->inode;
> > >  
> > >  	while (1) {
> > > -		if (path_equal(&nd->path, &nd->root))
> > > +		if (path_equal(&nd->path, &nd->root)) {
> > > +			if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_BENEATH))
> > > +				return -EXDEV;
> > 
> > Umm...  Are you sure it's not -ECHILD?
> 
> It wouldn't hurt to be -ECHILD -- though it's not clear to me how likely
> a success would be in REF-walk if the parent components didn't already
> trigger an unlazy_walk() in RCU-walk.
> 
> I guess that also means LOOKUP_NO_XDEV should trigger -ECHILD in
> follow_dotdot_rcu()?

Scratch the last question -- AFAICS we don't need to do that for
LOOKUP_NO_XDEV because we check against mount_lock so it's very unlikely
that -ECHILD will have any benefit.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
index b73ee1601bd4..54fdbdfbeb94 100644
--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@ -644,6 +644,14 @@  static bool legitimize_links(struct nameidata *nd)
 
 static bool legitimize_root(struct nameidata *nd)
 {
+	/*
+	 * For scoped-lookups (where nd->root has been zeroed), we need to
+	 * restart the whole lookup from scratch -- because set_root() is wrong
+	 * for these lookups (nd->dfd is the root, not the filesystem root).
+	 */
+	if (!nd->root.mnt && (nd->flags & LOOKUP_IS_SCOPED))
+		return false;
+	/* Nothing to do if nd->root is zero or is managed by the VFS user. */
 	if (!nd->root.mnt || (nd->flags & LOOKUP_ROOT))
 		return true;
 	nd->flags |= LOOKUP_ROOT_GRABBED;
@@ -779,7 +787,11 @@  static int complete_walk(struct nameidata *nd)
 	int status;
 
 	if (nd->flags & LOOKUP_RCU) {
-		if (!(nd->flags & LOOKUP_ROOT))
+		/*
+		 * We don't want to zero nd->root for scoped-lookups or
+		 * externally-managed nd->root.
+		 */
+		if (!(nd->flags & (LOOKUP_ROOT | LOOKUP_IS_SCOPED)))
 			nd->root.mnt = NULL;
 		if (unlikely(unlazy_walk(nd)))
 			return -ECHILD;
@@ -801,10 +813,18 @@  static int complete_walk(struct nameidata *nd)
 	return status;
 }
 
-static void set_root(struct nameidata *nd)
+static int set_root(struct nameidata *nd)
 {
 	struct fs_struct *fs = current->fs;
 
+	/*
+	 * Jumping to the real root in a scoped-lookup is a BUG in namei, but we
+	 * still have to ensure it doesn't happen because it will cause a breakout
+	 * from the dirfd.
+	 */
+	if (WARN_ON(nd->flags & LOOKUP_IS_SCOPED))
+		return -ENOTRECOVERABLE;
+
 	if (nd->flags & LOOKUP_RCU) {
 		unsigned seq;
 
@@ -817,6 +837,7 @@  static void set_root(struct nameidata *nd)
 		get_fs_root(fs, &nd->root);
 		nd->flags |= LOOKUP_ROOT_GRABBED;
 	}
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static void path_put_conditional(struct path *path, struct nameidata *nd)
@@ -840,11 +861,18 @@  static inline void path_to_nameidata(const struct path *path,
 
 static int nd_jump_root(struct nameidata *nd)
 {
+	if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_BENEATH))
+		return -EXDEV;
 	if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_NO_XDEV)) {
 		/* Absolute path arguments to path_init() are allowed. */
 		if (nd->path.mnt != NULL && nd->path.mnt != nd->root.mnt)
 			return -EXDEV;
 	}
+	if (!nd->root.mnt) {
+		int error = set_root(nd);
+		if (error)
+			return error;
+	}
 	if (nd->flags & LOOKUP_RCU) {
 		struct dentry *d;
 		nd->path = nd->root;
@@ -1096,15 +1124,17 @@  const char *get_link(struct nameidata *nd)
 				if (!nd->last_magiclink.same_mnt)
 					return ERR_PTR(-EXDEV);
 			}
+			/* Not currently safe for scoped-lookups. */
+			if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_IS_SCOPED))
+				return ERR_PTR(-EXDEV);
 		}
 		if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(res))
 			return res;
 	}
 	if (*res == '/') {
-		if (!nd->root.mnt)
-			set_root(nd);
-		if (unlikely(nd_jump_root(nd)))
-			return ERR_PTR(-ECHILD);
+		error = nd_jump_root(nd);
+		if (unlikely(error))
+			return ERR_PTR(error);
 		while (unlikely(*++res == '/'))
 			;
 	}
@@ -1373,8 +1403,11 @@  static int follow_dotdot_rcu(struct nameidata *nd)
 	struct inode *inode = nd->inode;
 
 	while (1) {
-		if (path_equal(&nd->path, &nd->root))
+		if (path_equal(&nd->path, &nd->root)) {
+			if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_BENEATH))
+				return -EXDEV;
 			break;
+		}
 		if (nd->path.dentry != nd->path.mnt->mnt_root) {
 			struct dentry *old = nd->path.dentry;
 			struct dentry *parent = old->d_parent;
@@ -1505,8 +1538,11 @@  static int path_parent_directory(struct path *path)
 static int follow_dotdot(struct nameidata *nd)
 {
 	while(1) {
-		if (path_equal(&nd->path, &nd->root))
+		if (path_equal(&nd->path, &nd->root)) {
+			if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_BENEATH))
+				return -EXDEV;
 			break;
+		}
 		if (nd->path.dentry != nd->path.mnt->mnt_root) {
 			int ret = path_parent_directory(&nd->path);
 			if (ret)
@@ -1731,8 +1767,20 @@  static inline int may_lookup(struct nameidata *nd)
 static inline int handle_dots(struct nameidata *nd, int type)
 {
 	if (type == LAST_DOTDOT) {
-		if (!nd->root.mnt)
-			set_root(nd);
+		int error = 0;
+
+		/*
+		 * Scoped-lookup flags resolving ".." is not currently safe --
+		 * races can cause our parent to have moved outside of the root
+		 * and us to skip over it.
+		 */
+		if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_IS_SCOPED))
+			return -EXDEV;
+		if (!nd->root.mnt) {
+			error = set_root(nd);
+			if (error)
+				return error;
+		}
 		if (nd->flags & LOOKUP_RCU) {
 			return follow_dotdot_rcu(nd);
 		} else
@@ -2195,6 +2243,7 @@  static int link_path_walk(const char *name, struct nameidata *nd)
 /* must be paired with terminate_walk() */
 static const char *path_init(struct nameidata *nd, unsigned flags)
 {
+	int error;
 	const char *s = nd->name->name;
 
 	if (!*s)
@@ -2227,11 +2276,12 @@  static const char *path_init(struct nameidata *nd, unsigned flags)
 	nd->path.dentry = NULL;
 
 	nd->m_seq = read_seqbegin(&mount_lock);
+
+	/* Figure out the starting path and root (if needed). */
 	if (*s == '/') {
-		set_root(nd);
-		if (likely(!nd_jump_root(nd)))
-			return s;
-		return ERR_PTR(-ECHILD);
+		error = nd_jump_root(nd);
+		if (unlikely(error))
+			return ERR_PTR(error);
 	} else if (nd->dfd == AT_FDCWD) {
 		if (flags & LOOKUP_RCU) {
 			struct fs_struct *fs = current->fs;
@@ -2247,7 +2297,6 @@  static const char *path_init(struct nameidata *nd, unsigned flags)
 			get_fs_pwd(current->fs, &nd->path);
 			nd->inode = nd->path.dentry->d_inode;
 		}
-		return s;
 	} else {
 		/* Caller must check execute permissions on the starting path component */
 		struct fd f = fdget_raw(nd->dfd);
@@ -2272,8 +2321,18 @@  static const char *path_init(struct nameidata *nd, unsigned flags)
 			nd->inode = nd->path.dentry->d_inode;
 		}
 		fdput(f);
-		return s;
 	}
+	/* For scoped-lookups we need to set the root to the dirfd as well. */
+	if (flags & LOOKUP_IS_SCOPED) {
+		nd->root = nd->path;
+		if (flags & LOOKUP_RCU) {
+			nd->root_seq = nd->seq;
+		} else {
+			path_get(&nd->root);
+			nd->flags |= LOOKUP_ROOT_GRABBED;
+		}
+	}
+	return s;
 }
 
 static const char *trailing_symlink(struct nameidata *nd)
diff --git a/include/linux/namei.h b/include/linux/namei.h
index 6105c8a59fc8..12f4f36835c2 100644
--- a/include/linux/namei.h
+++ b/include/linux/namei.h
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ 
 #ifndef _LINUX_NAMEI_H
 #define _LINUX_NAMEI_H
 
+#include <linux/fs.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/path.h>
 #include <linux/fcntl.h>
@@ -44,6 +45,9 @@  enum {LAST_NORM, LAST_ROOT, LAST_DOT, LAST_DOTDOT, LAST_BIND};
 #define LOOKUP_NO_SYMLINKS	0x020000 /* No symlink crossing. */
 #define LOOKUP_NO_MAGICLINKS	0x040000 /* No /proc/$pid/fd/ "symlink" crossing. */
 #define LOOKUP_NO_XDEV		0x080000 /* No mountpoint crossing. */
+#define LOOKUP_BENEATH		0x100000 /* No escaping from starting point. */
+/* LOOKUP_* flags which do scope-related checks based on the dirfd. */
+#define LOOKUP_IS_SCOPED LOOKUP_BENEATH
 
 extern int path_pts(struct path *path);