From patchwork Tue Sep 3 07:53:52 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Peter Zijlstra X-Patchwork-Id: 1156858 X-Patchwork-Delegate: davem@davemloft.net Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=vger.kernel.org (client-ip=209.132.180.67; helo=vger.kernel.org; envelope-from=sparclinux-owner@vger.kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="Gx11pokC"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46Mzks6qMJz9s7T for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 17:55:01 +1000 (AEST) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727953AbfICHy6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Sep 2019 03:54:58 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:34456 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726946AbfICHy5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Sep 2019 03:54:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=G28iE/deGPG0P4VQTMIwzwCBVO7DdIpw/n7sMkoDPlI=; b=Gx11pokC7ZUSl6Ij7jfDO7foa BzXtIUvI7BsKuZKZpzM+5G7ZKYV2bgimYA3TvtJtVnJmrEnfKf4/DZYEwLbWECE1CXBm38zkHi+33 uAl73vaUfsiml7p5HmwBrZr7owO5zm1VQYk0wiXRzfwITffEOTqlRY2wp1pjlRiwzPUUqryDTiTVk SaUovfNgliw3iF28YkNVvFDQ7BMk89W+Cy4V6ekrFWKmxau3LTU03Zy3bshbvteHJqKf62dyihpPN 8pJwTi952NtGpBG4HsfMuKd9nAW69xR2W9ZRvjh33aDIekkJwH93lq1b+vDAJoxE1OTiWvP+L+OnS cx2bk6/1Q==; Received: from j217100.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.217.100] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1i53dU-0008BU-Bc; Tue, 03 Sep 2019 07:53:56 +0000 Received: from hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net [192.168.1.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6470330116F; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 09:53:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: by hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6EFC529C073C2; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 09:53:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 09:53:52 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Yunsheng Lin , dalias@libc.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, linuxarm@huawei.com, jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, paulus@samba.org, hpa@zytor.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, chenhc@lemote.com, will@kernel.org, cai@lca.pw, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, mpe@ellerman.id.au, x86@kernel.org, rppt@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, dledford@redhat.com, mingo@redhat.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org, jhogan@kernel.org, nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mattst88@gmail.com, len.brown@intel.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com, bp@alien8.de, luto@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, rth@twiddle.net, axboe@kernel.dk, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ralf@linux-mips.org, tbogendoerfer@suse.de, paul.burton@mips.com, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru, akpm@linux-foundation.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, davem@davemloft.net Subject: [PATCH] x86/mm: Fix cpumask_of_node() error condition Message-ID: <20190903075352.GY2369@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1567231103-13237-1-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com> <1567231103-13237-3-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com> <20190831085539.GG2369@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <4d89c688-49e4-a2aa-32ee-65e36edcd913@huawei.com> <20190831161247.GM2369@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20190902072542.GN2369@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20190902181731.GB35858@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190902181731.GB35858@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: sparclinux-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 08:17:31PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > Nitpicking: please also fix the kernel message to say ">=". Full patch below. --- Subject: x86/mm: Fix cpumask_of_node() error condition When CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS we validate that the @node argument of cpumask_of_node() is a valid node_id. It however forgets to check for negative numbers. Fix this by explicitly casting to unsigned. (unsigned)node >= nr_node_ids verifies: 0 <= node < nr_node_ids Also ammend the error message to match the condition. Acked-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) --- arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c index e6dad600614c..4123100e0eaf 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c @@ -861,9 +861,9 @@ void numa_remove_cpu(int cpu) */ const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node) { - if (node >= nr_node_ids) { + if ((unsigned)node >= nr_node_ids) { printk(KERN_WARNING - "cpumask_of_node(%d): node > nr_node_ids(%u)\n", + "cpumask_of_node(%d): (unsigned)node >= nr_node_ids(%u)\n", node, nr_node_ids); dump_stack(); return cpu_none_mask;