diff mbox series

Clean up cut-here even harder (was Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: don't use __WARN() for WARN_ON())

Message ID 201908191026.831850CDB@keescook (mailing list archive)
State Not Applicable
Headers show
Series Clean up cut-here even harder (was Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: don't use __WARN() for WARN_ON()) | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
snowpatch_ozlabs/apply_patch success Successfully applied on branch next (c9633332103e55bc73d80d07ead28b95a22a85a3)
snowpatch_ozlabs/build-ppc64le success Build succeeded
snowpatch_ozlabs/build-ppc64be success Build succeeded
snowpatch_ozlabs/build-ppc64e success Build succeeded
snowpatch_ozlabs/build-pmac32 success Build succeeded
snowpatch_ozlabs/checkpatch fail total: 1 errors, 2 warnings, 0 checks, 88 lines checked

Commit Message

Kees Cook Aug. 19, 2019, 5:29 p.m. UTC 
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 09:28:03AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 01:06:28PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> > __WARN() used to just call __WARN_TAINT(TAINT_WARN)
> > 
> > But a call to printk() has been added in the commit identified below
> > to print a "---- cut here ----" line.
> > 
> > This change only applies to warnings using __WARN(), which means
> > WARN_ON() where the condition is constant at compile time.
> > For WARN_ON() with a non constant condition, the additional line is
> > not printed.
> > 
> > In addition, adding a call to printk() forces GCC to add a stack frame
> > and save volatile registers. Powerpc has been using traps to implement
> > warnings in order to avoid that.
> > 
> > So, call __WARN_TAINT(TAINT_WARN) directly instead of using __WARN()
> > in order to restore the previous behaviour.
> > 
> > If one day powerpc wants the decorative "---- cut here ----" line, it
> > has to be done in the trap handler, not in the WARN_ON() macro.
> > 
> > Fixes: 6b15f678fb7d ("include/asm-generic/bug.h: fix "cut here" for WARN_ON for __WARN_TAINT architectures")
> > Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
> 
> Ah! Hmpf. Yeah, that wasn't an intended side-effect of this fix.
> 
> It seems PPC is not alone in this situation of making this code much
> noisier. It looks like there needs to be a way to indicate to the trap
> handler that a message was delivered or not. Perhaps we can add another
> taint flag?

I meant "bug flag" here, not taint. Here's a stab at it. This tries to
remove redundant defines, and moves the "cut here" up into the slow path
explicitly (out of _warn()) and creates a flag so the trap handler can
actually detect if things were already reported...

Thoughts?
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/include/asm-generic/bug.h b/include/asm-generic/bug.h
index aa6c093d9ce9..c2b79878f24c 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/bug.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/bug.h
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ 
 #define BUGFLAG_WARNING		(1 << 0)
 #define BUGFLAG_ONCE		(1 << 1)
 #define BUGFLAG_DONE		(1 << 2)
+#define BUGFLAG_PRINTK		(1 << 3)
 #define BUGFLAG_TAINT(taint)	((taint) << 8)
 #define BUG_GET_TAINT(bug)	((bug)->flags >> 8)
 #endif
@@ -62,13 +63,11 @@  struct bug_entry {
 #endif
 
 #ifdef __WARN_FLAGS
-#define __WARN_TAINT(taint)		__WARN_FLAGS(BUGFLAG_TAINT(taint))
-#define __WARN_ONCE_TAINT(taint)	__WARN_FLAGS(BUGFLAG_ONCE|BUGFLAG_TAINT(taint))
-
 #define WARN_ON_ONCE(condition) ({				\
 	int __ret_warn_on = !!(condition);			\
 	if (unlikely(__ret_warn_on))				\
-		__WARN_ONCE_TAINT(TAINT_WARN);			\
+		__WARN_FLAGS(BUGFLAG_ONCE |			\
+			     BUGFLAG_TAINT(TAINT_WARN));	\
 	unlikely(__ret_warn_on);				\
 })
 #endif
@@ -89,7 +88,7 @@  struct bug_entry {
  *
  * Use the versions with printk format strings to provide better diagnostics.
  */
-#ifndef __WARN_TAINT
+#ifndef __WARN_FLAGS
 extern __printf(3, 4)
 void warn_slowpath_fmt(const char *file, const int line,
 		       const char *fmt, ...);
@@ -104,12 +103,12 @@  extern void warn_slowpath_null(const char *file, const int line);
 	warn_slowpath_fmt_taint(__FILE__, __LINE__, taint, arg)
 #else
 extern __printf(1, 2) void __warn_printk(const char *fmt, ...);
-#define __WARN() do { \
-	printk(KERN_WARNING CUT_HERE); __WARN_TAINT(TAINT_WARN); \
-} while (0)
+#define __WARN()		__WARN_FLAGS(BUGFLAG_TAINT(TAINT_WARN))
 #define __WARN_printf(arg...)	__WARN_printf_taint(TAINT_WARN, arg)
-#define __WARN_printf_taint(taint, arg...)				\
-	do { __warn_printk(arg); __WARN_TAINT(taint); } while (0)
+#define __WARN_printf_taint(taint, arg...)	do {			\
+		__warn_printk(arg); __WARN_FLAGS(BUGFLAG_PRINTK |	\
+						 BUGFLAG_TAINT(taint));	\
+	} while (0)
 #endif
 
 /* used internally by panic.c */
diff --git a/kernel/panic.c b/kernel/panic.c
index 057540b6eee9..03c98da6e3f7 100644
--- a/kernel/panic.c
+++ b/kernel/panic.c
@@ -551,9 +551,6 @@  void __warn(const char *file, int line, void *caller, unsigned taint,
 {
 	disable_trace_on_warning();
 
-	if (args)
-		pr_warn(CUT_HERE);
-
 	if (file)
 		pr_warn("WARNING: CPU: %d PID: %d at %s:%d %pS\n",
 			raw_smp_processor_id(), current->pid, file, line,
@@ -596,6 +593,7 @@  void warn_slowpath_fmt(const char *file, int line, const char *fmt, ...)
 {
 	struct warn_args args;
 
+	pr_warn(CUT_HERE);
 	args.fmt = fmt;
 	va_start(args.args, fmt);
 	__warn(file, line, __builtin_return_address(0), TAINT_WARN, NULL,
@@ -609,6 +607,7 @@  void warn_slowpath_fmt_taint(const char *file, int line,
 {
 	struct warn_args args;
 
+	pr_warn(CUT_HERE);
 	args.fmt = fmt;
 	va_start(args.args, fmt);
 	__warn(file, line, __builtin_return_address(0), taint, NULL, &args);
diff --git a/lib/bug.c b/lib/bug.c
index 1077366f496b..73ce8f9d9eff 100644
--- a/lib/bug.c
+++ b/lib/bug.c
@@ -181,6 +181,10 @@  enum bug_trap_type report_bug(unsigned long bugaddr, struct pt_regs *regs)
 		}
 	}
 
+	/* Did this trap already report a printk line with "cut here"? */
+	if ((bug->flags & BUGFLAG_PRINTK) == 0)
+		printk(KERN_DEFAULT CUT_HERE);
+
 	if (warning) {
 		/* this is a WARN_ON rather than BUG/BUG_ON */
 		__warn(file, line, (void *)bugaddr, BUG_GET_TAINT(bug), regs,
@@ -188,8 +192,6 @@  enum bug_trap_type report_bug(unsigned long bugaddr, struct pt_regs *regs)
 		return BUG_TRAP_TYPE_WARN;
 	}
 
-	printk(KERN_DEFAULT CUT_HERE);
-
 	if (file)
 		pr_crit("kernel BUG at %s:%u!\n", file, line);
 	else