@@ -778,6 +778,7 @@ static inline bool bpf_dump_raw_ok(void)
struct bpf_prog *bpf_patch_insn_single(struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 off,
const struct bpf_insn *patch, u32 len);
+int bpf_remove_insns(struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 off, u32 cnt);
void bpf_clear_redirect_map(struct bpf_map *map);
@@ -462,6 +462,18 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_patch_insn_single(struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 off,
return prog_adj;
}
+int bpf_remove_insns(struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 off, u32 cnt)
+{
+ /* Branch offsets can't overflow when program is shrinking, no need
+ * to call bpf_adj_branches(..., true) here
+ */
+ memmove(prog->insnsi + off, prog->insnsi + off + cnt,
+ sizeof(struct bpf_insn) * (prog->len - off - cnt));
+ prog->len -= cnt;
+
+ return WARN_ON_ONCE(bpf_adj_branches(prog, off, off + cnt, off, false));
+}
+
void bpf_prog_kallsyms_del_subprogs(struct bpf_prog *fp)
{
int i;
@@ -6432,6 +6432,150 @@ static struct bpf_prog *bpf_patch_insn_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 of
return new_prog;
}
+static int adjust_subprog_starts_after_remove(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
+ u32 off, u32 cnt)
+{
+ int i, j;
+
+ /* find first prog starting at or after off (first to remove) */
+ for (i = 0; i < env->subprog_cnt; i++)
+ if (env->subprog_info[i].start >= off)
+ break;
+ /* find first prog starting at or after off + cnt (first to stay) */
+ for (j = i; j < env->subprog_cnt; j++)
+ if (env->subprog_info[j].start >= off + cnt)
+ break;
+ /* if j doesn't start exactly at off + cnt, we are just removing
+ * the front of previous prog
+ */
+ if (env->subprog_info[j].start != off + cnt)
+ j--;
+
+ if (j > i) {
+ struct bpf_prog_aux *aux = env->prog->aux;
+ int move;
+
+ /* move fake 'exit' subprog as well */
+ move = env->subprog_cnt + 1 - j;
+
+ memmove(env->subprog_info + i,
+ env->subprog_info + j,
+ sizeof(*env->subprog_info) * move);
+ env->subprog_cnt -= j - i;
+
+ /* remove func_info */
+ if (aux->func_info) {
+ move = aux->func_info_cnt - j;
+
+ memmove(aux->func_info + i,
+ aux->func_info + j,
+ sizeof(*aux->func_info) * move);
+ aux->func_info_cnt -= j - i;
+ /* func_info->insn_off is set after all code rewrites,
+ * in adjust_btf_func() - no need to adjust
+ */
+ }
+ } else {
+ /* convert i from "first prog to remove" to "first to adjust" */
+ if (env->subprog_info[i].start == off)
+ i++;
+ }
+
+ /* update fake 'exit' subprog as well */
+ for (; i <= env->subprog_cnt; i++)
+ env->subprog_info[i].start -= cnt;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int bpf_adj_linfo_after_remove(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 off,
+ u32 cnt)
+{
+ struct bpf_prog *prog = env->prog;
+ u32 i, l_off, l_cnt, nr_linfo;
+ struct bpf_line_info *linfo;
+
+ nr_linfo = prog->aux->nr_linfo;
+ if (!nr_linfo)
+ return 0;
+
+ linfo = prog->aux->linfo;
+
+ /* find first line info to remove, count lines to be removed */
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_linfo; i++)
+ if (linfo[i].insn_off >= off)
+ break;
+
+ l_off = i;
+ l_cnt = 0;
+ for (; i < nr_linfo; i++)
+ if (linfo[i].insn_off < off + cnt)
+ l_cnt++;
+ else
+ break;
+
+ /* First live insn doesn't match first live linfo, it needs to "inherit"
+ * last removed linfo. prog is already modified, so prog->len == off
+ * means no live instructions after (tail of the program was removed).
+ */
+ if (prog->len != off && l_cnt &&
+ (i == nr_linfo || linfo[i].insn_off != off + cnt)) {
+ l_cnt--;
+ linfo[--i].insn_off = off + cnt;
+ }
+
+ /* remove the line info which refer to the removed instructions */
+ if (l_cnt) {
+ memmove(linfo + l_off, linfo + i,
+ sizeof(*linfo) * (nr_linfo - i));
+
+ prog->aux->nr_linfo -= l_cnt;
+ nr_linfo = prog->aux->nr_linfo;
+ }
+
+ /* pull all linfo[i].insn_off >= off + cnt in by cnt */
+ for (i = l_off; i < nr_linfo; i++)
+ linfo[i].insn_off -= cnt;
+
+ /* fix up all subprogs (incl. 'exit') which start >= off */
+ for (i = 0; i <= env->subprog_cnt; i++)
+ if (env->subprog_info[i].linfo_idx > l_off) {
+ /* program may have started in the removed region but
+ * may not be fully removed
+ */
+ if (env->subprog_info[i].linfo_idx >= l_off + l_cnt)
+ env->subprog_info[i].linfo_idx -= l_cnt;
+ else
+ env->subprog_info[i].linfo_idx = l_off;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int verifier_remove_insns(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 off, u32 cnt)
+{
+ struct bpf_insn_aux_data *aux_data = env->insn_aux_data;
+ unsigned int orig_prog_len = env->prog->len;
+ int err;
+
+ err = bpf_remove_insns(env->prog, off, cnt);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ err = adjust_subprog_starts_after_remove(env, off, cnt);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ err = bpf_adj_linfo_after_remove(env, off, cnt);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ memmove(aux_data + off, aux_data + off + cnt,
+ sizeof(*aux_data) * (orig_prog_len - off - cnt));
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/* The verifier does more data flow analysis than llvm and will not
* explore branches that are dead at run time. Malicious programs can
* have dead code too. Therefore replace all dead at-run-time code
@@ -6492,6 +6636,30 @@ static void opt_hard_wire_dead_code_branches(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
}
}
+static int opt_remove_dead_code(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
+{
+ struct bpf_insn_aux_data *aux_data = env->insn_aux_data;
+ int insn_cnt = env->prog->len;
+ int i, err;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < insn_cnt; i++) {
+ int j;
+
+ j = 0;
+ while (i + j < insn_cnt && !aux_data[i + j].seen)
+ j++;
+ if (!j)
+ continue;
+
+ err = verifier_remove_insns(env, i, j);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ insn_cnt = env->prog->len;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/* convert load instructions that access fields of a context type into a
* sequence of instructions that access fields of the underlying structure:
* struct __sk_buff -> struct sk_buff
@@ -7282,11 +7450,13 @@ int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr,
if (is_priv) {
if (ret == 0)
opt_hard_wire_dead_code_branches(env);
+ if (ret == 0)
+ ret = opt_remove_dead_code(env);
+ } else {
+ if (ret == 0)
+ sanitize_dead_code(env);
}
- if (ret == 0)
- sanitize_dead_code(env);
-
if (ret == 0)
/* program is valid, convert *(u32*)(ctx + off) accesses */
ret = convert_ctx_accesses(env);