Message ID | 20190116224311.GA30353@tucnak |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | Don't DCE const/pure calls that can throw if cfg can't be altered (PR rtl-optimization/88870) | expand |
On 1/16/19 3:43 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > For normal instructions, deletable_insn_p has: > /* Don't delete insns that may throw if we cannot do so. */ > if (!(cfun->can_delete_dead_exceptions && can_alter_cfg) > && !insn_nothrow_p (insn)) > return false; > > The following patch adds that for the const/pure non-looping calls > that are handled earlier in the function as well (I haven't moved this test > earlier so we don't check insn_nothrow_p on jump insns etc.). > > The other change is just to handle those calls the same as non-const/pure, > if we never consider them to be deletable, there is no point in > find_call_stack_args for them, like we don't do that for normal calls. > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk? > > 2019-01-16 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> > > PR rtl-optimization/88870 > * dce.c (deletable_insn_p): Never delete const/pure calls that can > throw if we can't alter the cfg or delete dead exceptions. > (mark_insn): Don't call find_call_stack_args for such calls. > > * gcc.dg/pr88870.c: New test. OK. Though I wonder if we want to continue to support -fnon-call-exceptions. With GCJ gone is there any value left in that capability? There's little doubt in my mind other parts of GCC are not -fnon-call-exception safe. jeff
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 03:48:07PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote: > > 2019-01-16 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> > > > > PR rtl-optimization/88870 > > * dce.c (deletable_insn_p): Never delete const/pure calls that can > > throw if we can't alter the cfg or delete dead exceptions. > > (mark_insn): Don't call find_call_stack_args for such calls. > > > > * gcc.dg/pr88870.c: New test. > OK. Though I wonder if we want to continue to support > -fnon-call-exceptions. With GCJ gone is there any value left in that > capability? There's little doubt in my mind other parts of GCC are not > -fnon-call-exception safe. AFAIK Ada and Go use -fnon-call-exceptions by default and heavily rely on it. Jakub
> > > PR rtl-optimization/88870 > > > * dce.c (deletable_insn_p): Never delete const/pure calls that can > > > throw if we can't alter the cfg or delete dead exceptions. > > > (mark_insn): Don't call find_call_stack_args for such calls. > > > > > > * gcc.dg/pr88870.c: New test. > > OK. Though I wonder if we want to continue to support > > -fnon-call-exceptions. With GCJ gone is there any value left in that > > capability? There's little doubt in my mind other parts of GCC are not > > -fnon-call-exception safe. > > AFAIK Ada and Go use -fnon-call-exceptions by default and heavily rely on > it. Agreed.
> AFAIK Ada and Go use -fnon-call-exceptions by default and heavily rely on > it. Right, the Ada compiler uses -fnon-call-exceptions -fdelete-dead-exceptions and ACATS could not be passed with optimization enabled without the former. Btw, there are a couple of improper direct uses of flag_non_call_exceptions in the sources, may I change them to cfun->can_throw_non_call_exceptions? gimple-ssa-isolate-paths.c: if (!flag_non_call_exceptions) gimple-ssa-isolate-paths.c: if (!flag_non_call_exceptions tree-ssa-alias.c: if (flag_non_call_exceptions && pi->pt.null)
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:27:31PM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote: > > AFAIK Ada and Go use -fnon-call-exceptions by default and heavily rely on > > it. > > Right, the Ada compiler uses -fnon-call-exceptions -fdelete-dead-exceptions > and ACATS could not be passed with optimization enabled without the former. > > Btw, there are a couple of improper direct uses of flag_non_call_exceptions in > the sources, may I change them to cfun->can_throw_non_call_exceptions? Yes. > gimple-ssa-isolate-paths.c: if (!flag_non_call_exceptions) > gimple-ssa-isolate-paths.c: if (!flag_non_call_exceptions > tree-ssa-alias.c: if (flag_non_call_exceptions && pi->pt.null) Jakub
--- gcc/dce.c.jj 2019-01-01 12:37:21.308906844 +0100 +++ gcc/dce.c 2019-01-16 11:39:13.432604633 +0100 @@ -108,7 +108,10 @@ deletable_insn_p (rtx_insn *insn, bool f /* We can delete dead const or pure calls as long as they do not infinite loop. */ && (RTL_CONST_OR_PURE_CALL_P (insn) - && !RTL_LOOPING_CONST_OR_PURE_CALL_P (insn))) + && !RTL_LOOPING_CONST_OR_PURE_CALL_P (insn)) + /* Don't delete calls that may throw if we cannot do so. */ + && ((cfun->can_delete_dead_exceptions && can_alter_cfg) + || insn_nothrow_p (insn))) return find_call_stack_args (as_a <rtx_call_insn *> (insn), false, fast, arg_stores); @@ -201,7 +204,9 @@ mark_insn (rtx_insn *insn, bool fast) && !df_in_progress && !SIBLING_CALL_P (insn) && (RTL_CONST_OR_PURE_CALL_P (insn) - && !RTL_LOOPING_CONST_OR_PURE_CALL_P (insn))) + && !RTL_LOOPING_CONST_OR_PURE_CALL_P (insn)) + && ((cfun->can_delete_dead_exceptions && can_alter_cfg) + || insn_nothrow_p (insn))) find_call_stack_args (as_a <rtx_call_insn *> (insn), true, fast, NULL); } } --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr88870.c.jj 2019-01-16 11:25:01.434552788 +0100 +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr88870.c 2019-01-16 11:24:48.172769383 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +/* PR rtl-optimization/88870 */ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-O1 -fexceptions -fnon-call-exceptions -ftrapv -fno-tree-dominator-opts" } */ + +int a, b; + +void +foo (int *x) +{ + int c = 0; + { + int d; + x = &c; + for (;;) + { + x = &d; + b = 0; + d = c + 1; + b = c = 1; + ++a; + } + } +}